Compare And Contrast Schweitzer And Mahatma Gandhi

Great Essays
Mahatma Gandhi, leader of the Indian independence movement, saw nonviolence as an “end in itself” where one is able to see the true nature of things. Similarly, Albert Schweitzer, a Christian missionary, saw the nonhuman world as sacred and held a deep respect for all life. My paper will take a comparative look at both men and their practice of non-violence in ways that promote oneness between humans and nonhumans. I will also take a comparative look at the two men and their differing rationale and language between humans and nonhumans in distinct situations. In the next paragraphs, I will take a look at Gandhi and Schweitzer’s early life and influences behind their philosophies of non-violence in regards to nonhumans.
Early in his life, Gandhi
…show more content…
Both men drew greatly from both of their traditions for nonviolence, while taking from other nationalities and traditions as well. Gandhi admired Jesus’ take on nonviolence in the Christian faith while at the same time Schweitzer admired the other cultures and traditions of the East. Particularly, for Schweitzer he admired the concept ahimsa. However, he felt ahimsa was limited mostly to humans and not as much to the non-human realm. Schweitzer knew about Gandhi through his research and knew that the ahimsa was closely related to the philosophy that he was searching for. These two important men were living in the same time period, looking for the same things, but never truly interacted, and never had their paths fully cross. I believe if they had met and worked together they might have come to an agreement or similar understanding to spread nonviolence and better respect for nonhumans.
I will first address the major similarity between the two men in regards to violence towards nonhumans and their rejection of negative treatments such as sacrifice, hunting for sport, and the use of animals in scientific research. Also, the two men were very similar in the belief that violence would sometimes become

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Martin Luther King Jr. and Gandhi are constantly hailed as the world’s examples of peaceful protest, the two achieving opposite goals with equal success without unnecessary violence. The two shared similarities of being strongly rooted in religion but in opposite manners. Gandhi’s methods exclusively catered to the religious with many of his ideas crossing a “point at which the humanistic and the religious attitudes cease to be reconcilable” (Orwell, 4). His philosophies rely heavily on the followers aligning with the same religious beliefs that he lived all aspects of his life by. Both men lived religious lives with Dr. King “being the son, the grandson and the great-grandson of preachers” (King) and Gandhi living an ascetic life completely governed by his religious beliefs.…

    • 1015 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Gandhi was a Hindu and believed nonviolence was the highest virtue of life and was only attained at the end of a prolonged spiritual practice. When writing to Lord Irwin, he expresses how he could never intentionally hurt anything that lives even if someone does the greatest wrong upon him…

    • 1182 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dbq Non Violence Essay

    • 668 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Non-violence is a peaceful way to evoke social and political change. Three cases where non-violence worked were in the countries of India, the United States, and South Africa where people felt they were being treated unjust. Gandhi, King, and Mandela all used non-violence, what made it work? Nonviolence is the practice of refraining from the use of violence when protesting against oppression. The use of non-violence by Gandhi, King, and Mandela worked because they were strong leaders who were able to unify people and used effective methods when protesting.…

    • 668 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The difference between these person are that Cesar Chavez was a mexican and Gandhi is a indian and they both fought for different reason. Like Cesar Chavez he fought for farm workers and Gandhi fought in the civil war. These person are the same in a way both these person did nonviolence, fasting, and boycotting thing. Both of these person achieved their goals they had help the people got better thing. Cesar Chavez help farm worker get better working conditions and Gandhi help his people be free from the british that rule India and South Africa.…

    • 621 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Castaway Analysis

    • 1827 Words
    • 8 Pages

    As I mentioned earlier, Gandhi was known for his theory of using non-violence to get what you wanted. He was able to get people to follow his belief of “Satyagraha”. This was what Gandhi referred to as soul-force. He preached that violence would only make matters worst. Unjust rules should never be accepted in his eyes, being that every law is not just.…

    • 1827 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    One reason why this can be seen as a difference of Mahatmas Gandhi and Maximilien Robespierre as a result of Maximilien Robespierre wanting to eliminate religion in France while Mahatmas Gandhi wanted all religions to cooperate and not fight. An incident involving Mahatmas Gandhi endeavoring to not let India to cleave into India and Pakistan further illustrates that Mahatmas Gandhi wanted religions to cooperate and not fight. Overall, the difference Mahatmas Gandhi and Maximilien Robespierre was that Maximilien Robespierre tried to eliminate religion while Mahatmas Gandhi wanted the religions to cooperate with each…

    • 360 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the passages "Letter from Birmingham Jail" by Dr. Martin Luther King Jr and "Speech at the March on Washington" by Josephine Bake and "form Letter to Viceroy, Lord Irwin" each passage shows many examples of equality, and how non-violence can bring equal rights. To achieve true freedom one most use non-violence means in order to find a peaceful solution. To begin with discrimination people should respect the religion or color of the person and not make them less. Based on the "Speech at the March on Washington" by Josephine Baker on lines 42-45, Baker expressed "I tell you I have walked into the places of king's and queens and into the houses of presidents and much more.." This shows that she went to another country.…

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gandhi set an example for world peace, while later generations try to not let history repeat itself with the actions taken by Hitler. For example, Ghandi’s Salt March drew worldwide attention and helped advance Indian efforts for independence (Doc 1). Ghandi says “The reason for the struggle having drawn the attention of the world, I know does not lie in the fact that we Indians are fighting for our liberty, but in the fact … as far as history shows us, have not been adopted by any other people of whom we have any record. The means adopted are not violence … they are purely and simply truth and nonviolence (Doc 2). The actions used to raise support and achieve independence was peace, not violence.…

    • 685 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The first quote referring to Gandhi’s beliefs states, “My religion is based on truth and nonviolence. Truth is my God. Nonviolence is the means of realizing Him. ”Document A:Mohamdas Gandhi on Religion . In this quote,he claims that his religion,or…

    • 601 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Robert Frost talks about a divergent road in the yellow wood, referring to two different paths that one could take. The two paths that could lead into completely different ideas of the world. Much like the views of Lao-Tzu and Niccolo Machiavelli, one believes in the power of love and the other the power of an iron first. Lao-Tzu takes the role of a classic Gandhi Complex. He almost seems to view the world by separating himself from the world.…

    • 1229 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Hinduism and Jainism are both ancient religions originating from South Asia, or more specifically India. They both have many similar characteristic features, such as the concepts of samsara, karma and moksha. But, they also differs in many things, even including the concepts of three aforementioned terms. This essay will compare the following five concepts: karma, samasara, ahimsa, moksha, and world renunciation, and explain their purposes in both Hinduism and Jainism. Notably these five concepts are surprisingly complex and carries great deals of importance to both religions.…

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mahatma Gandhi and Osama Bin Laden; two names that can immediately make you feel at ease and then distressed by having them so close in proximity to each other. These names don’t seem to fit together and definitely don’t seem as though they should be together on the same page. Despite their obvious differences, though, they can be seen as alike in some ways. Granted, one was a man who stood up for peace while the other stood up for violence; but both of them were very successful in motivating people to act on behalf of their visions. These two very well known men were able to cause a change in the world, some extremely good and some extremely bad, both with the unfortunate end of their lives at the hand of their opposers.…

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In similar time periods in the Eastern Hemisphere, two men were leading movements with the same goal - to expel Western civilization from their countries. Although these two men had the same goal in mind, the methods through which they hoped to achieve these goals were drastically different. In Africa, Franz Fanon was calling for a violent removal of the French from Algeria through his book The Wretched of the Earth. In Asia, M.K. Gandhi was writing his pleas to the Indian people to push the British out of India through far less violent means. If these two men are fighting for the same cause, how is it that their methods were so different?…

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Ahimsa, according to the Merriam-Webster dictionary, is the belief of nonviolence toward any living being. On August 8th, 1942 Mahatma Gandhi gave his “Quit India” speech, which called on India to exercise his belief in Ahimsa. The speech was also significant because it established Gandhi’s dedication to the concept of non-violence in order to achieve India’s independence from Great Britain. This speech was particularly important compared to Gandhi’s other speeches because the All-India Congress Committee had decided on a policy to end the British rule in India immediately, and Gandhi was recognized as the leader in the campaign. This paper will analyze evidence that Gandhi displayed in his “Quit India” speech through the interpretation and…

    • 2103 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    3-Review of Literature Essay Did Martin Luther King, Mahatma Gandhi and Nelson Mandela all share the same principles, methods and goals? Martin Luther King, Mahatma Gandhi and Nelson Mandela all were influenced by each other and believed in the same non-violence principle. Each leader had different methods they used which were similar and had some success towards their movement. They also had goals that were different but similar because they were all successful and cost them their freedom. Martin Luther King Jr, Mahatma Gandhi and Nelson Mandela principles, methods, and goals are not all the same but were similar in different ways.…

    • 1449 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays