1. What is the situation that this argument responds to?
A) The students learning experience in the classroom.
2. What elements of background or context need to be presented for this audience? Is this new information or is she just reminding me of matters I already have some familiarity with?
A) There is a need to present a definition of the subject. Her background information is her definition of learning. “Learning” is gaining knowledge and experience which stays in the long-term memory and is of value to the recipient.” She is reminding us of matters we are already familiar with.
3. What are the principal issues involved in this argument?
A) Students do not retain the info they learned. The structure of the class poses …show more content…
What image of herself should she project?
A) She should be representing herself objectively. Unfortunately, she comes across as angered and uninformed.
The Confirmation:
1. What are the arguments that support her thesis that her audience is most likely to respond to?
A) The education system in the United States today treats the minds of children like bowls to be filled with information. This argument affects the pathos of the audience. The students’ parents do not want to feel as though the education system is abusing their children’s minds. She argues that in the school system, “children begin associating learning with boredom or frustration and actually start to dislike and even fight against learning.”
4. What kind of inartistic proofs does her audience respect and respond well to?
A) People feel that grades are important because they are our way of measuring how well a child is doing in school. It is commonly thought that schools give people the knowledge they will need in life.
6. What kinds of artistic proofs will help reinforce her position?
A) She tells a friends story. Her friend has a learning difference and could not stay on track with the public schools lesson plans. He decided to enjoy learning and later was grateful for his parent’s decision to send him to catholic …show more content…
What are the possible ways someone can misunderstand her position?
A) She uses fallacies in her argument; they hinder her by proving nothing. One of the fallacies used in this argument is the Either-Or Reasoning fallacy. She offers only two options for why a student is actually successful in school. The student either switches to a private school or is a fast learner.
The Conclusion:
1. How can she best leave a strong impression of the rightness and importance of her view?
A) She should not repeat her thesis or any of her topic sentences. She should instead try and refer back to the common ground she maintains with her audience.
3. What is the larger significance of the argument? What long-range implications will have the most resonance with her readers?
A) The larger significance of the argument is in the conclusion. She says, “The future of our world could be shaped by how well our children are prepared for it.” This quote talks about the school system affecting the world, not just anyone’s school. A long range implication from this argument can be found in the last paragraph. The author says, “Learning can be what gives our lives value, but we are cheating our children of that.” She uses pathos primarily to argue her