Consensual Contact Vs Probable Cause Analysis

Improved Essays
In the criminal justice system, such things as consensual contact, detention and probable cause are important to for law enforcement. To know the difference between each could be difference between enforcing the law and letting someone go. According to Robertson and Wallace, consensual contact is defined as when an individual is not detained by the police and the police have not had any manner recommend to that individual and is not free to end the encounter and withdraw from. There are two types of detentions. Terry-Type Detention is defined as an arrest from a stop-and-frisk situation, while Temporary Detention is defined for questioning that is not considered to be an arrest. Lastly, probable cause is defined as a quality by police authorities …show more content…
A vehicle is less than a full arrest and the level of it, is that probable cause supports a temporary detention less than required to a full arrest. The detention starts when the officer is coming to a vehicle that is stopped. As soon as the officer turns on his red lights, is not a detention whether if the vehicle is already parked, and the officer gets out to ask the driver for his or her identification or license. Detention needs to have a reasonable suspicion if the person doing criminal activity, is about to occur in a criminal activity, or has been recently been doing criminal activity. “People v. Remiro, a state appellate court upheld the stopping of the vehicle on the basis of the officer’s reasonable suspicion. In the case, the officer saw a van he did not recognize that was driving slowly in a residential neighborhood at 1:30 a.m. The officer followed the van and noticed that it was traveling in a circle”. The van was stopped for the following reasons: the van was speeding, the police officer knew the neighborhood, knew about each vehicle and the patterns, but he did not recognize this vehicle. The police officer had known that there were burglaries that have been occurred in that neighborhood. Lastly, he knew that vans are usually used for …show more content…
If you are pulled over, trying to figure out if the police officer has any probable cause to legally search you, you will always have the right to decline any appeals by saying, “Officer, I don’t consent to any searches.”. You can say this to the officer, over and over again if you please too. If the officers finds something illegal in your car, without having a warrant, you can get a lawyer and show the evidence in court. The Terry Case was big in the United States Supreme Court back on October 31, 1963. Two men, John W. Terry and Richard Clinton were stopped by detective Martin McFadden. The officer stopped the two men because he felt like were acting in a suspicious way. Terry and Richard were walking back and forth near a window that they kept staring at and soon later met up with another guy, Katz. They had a short conversation and then Katz left. The two men walked a couple blocks meeting up with Katz, but the officer followed them as the guys were together. The officer went up to the three men and asked them for their names and Terry mumbled something under their breathe and officer McFadden spun him around, feeling a weapon, that was a pistol under his overcoat. The officer reached into his overcoat but was unable to get the gun out of his pocket. He then, ordered all of the three men to go inside the store and demanded them to be facing against the wall,

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Case Citation: Maryland v. Pringle, 540 U.S. 366 (2003) Parties: State of Maryland, Petitioner / Appellant Joseph Jermaine Pringle, Defendant / Appellee Case Facts: On August 7th, 1999 a Maryland police officers legally stopped a car for speeding in the early morning hours. The car was occupied by three men, to include the Defendant/Appellee Joseph Jermaine Pringle. The Officer that initiated the stop saw a large roll of cash in the glovebox while the driver was retrieving his registration. All men were checked and cleared for outstanding warrants and a warning was issued to the vehicles driver. The officer requested and was granted permission to search the vehicle.…

    • 659 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this case of Illinois v. Wardlow, Sam Wardlow, a 44-year old black man was wrongly searched after he was apparently seen acting ‘suspicious’ when he ran after he saw four police cars driving up. He was then chased by Timothy Nolan, a veteran police officer, as he believed Wardlow as guilty. The officers believed him to be in a ‘high crime area’. They caught up to Wardlow and frisked him. During the search, they found a handgun.…

    • 351 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Name: Case brief assignment Prof: Minnesota v Dickerson, 508 U.S.3669 (1993) Facts of the case Two Minneapolis police officers were patrolling the North area of the city in a marked police car in the evening on November 9, 1989. There was the defendant, Timothy Dickerson, in a known drug zone. At around 8:15 p.m., one officer observed the defendant leaving a 12-unit apartment building along Morgan Avenue, a renowned drug sale premise.…

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The officers at the nigh club had no way of knowing that the subject in the parking lot would get behind the wheel. They did not owe the duty to arrest to the general public. In the parking lot the subject could have been cooling off, getting sick, waiting for a ride, smoking, or waiting for the rest of his or her friends to leave and take them home. The officers had no way of knowing what the subject was…

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Coolidge V. S. 403 Essay

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages

    It was actually a very interesting case. Long story short, a man named Edward Coolidge was suspected and eventually charged with killing a 14 year female named Pamela Mason. Edward was questioned and cooperatively agreed to take a lie detector test and even showed the officers three different guns that he owned. The lie detector was inconclusive, but he did however admit of committing theft. Two different officers decided to visit the home while Coolidge wasn’t there to confirm his story with the wife.…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Government’s case against Rodgers is a criminal case, arising out of the Government’s unconstitutional search of Rodgers’s vehicle. This Court should grant Rodgers’s motion to suppress evidence because the Government cannot meet its burden of proving that this unconstitutional search falls within any established exception to the Fourth Amendment warrant requirement. The Government cannot establish the exceptions of officer safety or that the vehicle contains evidence of the offense of arrest. Sindell handcuffed and arrested Rodgers for unpaid traffic tickets. When the search took place, Rodgers was unable to reach inside the vehicle or the passenger compartment, so he was not a threat to the officers.…

    • 117 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Achman Case Study

    • 748 Words
    • 3 Pages

    I, Supreme Court Justice, Floyd McLeod, find in favor of Mohammed Achman. This case has proved to me that Mr. Achman 's rights as an U.S. citizen were violated multiple times. To go more in depth; on September 27, 2001, approximately two weeks after the terrorist attack of the World Trade Center, America, especially New York ,were on edge in finding any little details to get to the bottom of the attack and any future attacks. Unfortunately, the Achman 's felt the wrath and discrimination from American civilians. It all started with people breaking one of his windows to his store and destroying his mosque in queens.…

    • 748 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However if the officer had pulled these individuals over soley based on the color of their skin, he would not be able to search and seize the individuals. The fourth amendment forbids an officer to search and seize soley on the basis of race, and if the officer had racially profiled the individuals then they could have filed a motion to suppress. However, the officer acted within the scope of the seizure by having legitimate interest and suspicions. The Fourth Amendment clearly states that an officer may search the person arrested, those in plain view of the officer and the accused, and things or places that the acussed person can touch, or that is otherwise in their immediate personal control without a warrant as long as there is legitimate reasoning and it is not an unreasonable search.…

    • 1098 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Unlike in the case Dietz, Mr. Dietz was held for extended period of time and no police officers called. Generally, courts, want to store to demonstrate that if the period of detention…

    • 226 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Simon Flacks Analysis

    • 291 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The article explores the different approaches that police have taken in order to minimise and eliminate illegal stop and searches, by developing different tactics that are within the…

    • 291 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    a) Consent to Search In R v. Wills (1992) the court found the following criteria necessary for a valid consent search: 1. There was consent, expressed or implied; 2. The giver of the consent had the authority to give the consent; 3. The consent was voluntary (not police coerced); 4. The giver of consent was aware of the police conduct; 5.…

    • 1052 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Fourth Amendment In Texas

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages

    As well the court also stated that detaining a person to require him to identify himself with lack of evidence against him/her violates their Fourth Amendment right. The Fourth Amendment requires such action,or that the seizure should be carried out pursuant to plan embodying explicit,neutral limitations of individual officers. In other words, a police officer can’t arrest you,detain you,or search you without a search warrant or an arrest warnat. Though there are some expectations on getting search or being detained,like for instances if a police officer asks your permission to search in your belongings and you agree then that’s not considered an intrusion of your privacy because you allowed him/her to search in your belongings. Same goes for being arrested because in order to be charged with a crime police officers must have reasonable suspicion and enough evidence to charge you with that crime.…

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Myths Of Racial Profiling

    • 2101 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Racial profiling is seen on a regular basis in traffic stops. This discrimination within the criminal justice system is composed of mainly African Americans and Hispanics. These minorities are targeted within the streets as criminals by police officers. A video from The Orland Sentinel showed major evidence of racial profiling by police. Within the video, there were more than one thousand people’s roadside stops shown.…

    • 2101 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Stop And Frisk

    • 1259 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Stop and frisk should not be legal because many times these searches do…

    • 1259 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Introduction Stop and frisk tactics have been used to preserve public safety and officer well-being. A stop and frisk is a non-intrusive police stop and pat-down based on the reasonable suspicion in relation to a crime that has happened, will happen, or is in the process of being carried out (Cornell Law School, 2017). Stop and frisk situations are highly common and the reported instances have increased by approximately 7% annually (Hovhannisyan, 2006). However, the approach is highly controversial because it operates primarily on officers' perceptions and opinions, which opens the door to personal prejudices dictating the usage. This executive summary includes the advantages and disadvantages involved in stop and frisk procedures as well as the constitutionality and recommendations to improve the approach.…

    • 1015 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays