Immigration and human rights are an issue that is currently at the forefront of American politics. Two sides exist to the argument either for or against immigration. One faction argues against immigration, stating that the system is abused currently and many enter America illegally to exploit American citizens. The other side defends their stance by citing the economic production of the immigrants, regardless of their residency status. This same group also argues the rights of each citizen as a human being, deciding they should be able to come as they please. Certain things both parties can agree on however. These include that there must be a process in place to handle the flow of immigration, and that there must be a proper infrastructure
…show more content…
According to cultural relativism, a belief or action is relatively acceptable to their culture. In America, the culture is one of hard-work, prosperity, and dedication for all who follow and trust the process. Unfortunately, many people bypass this process and immigrate to the United States illegally. This issue directly defies the culture in the United States, and upsets many citizens who followed the process. Not only is this action prohibited in accordance to cultural relativism, it can even syphon opportunities from those who immigrated here legally. Along with the syphoning of production, many taxpayers are forced to pay for the benefits that these illegal immigrants acquire. The immigrants who come to the nation illegally often times refuse to assimilate, and can cause …show more content…
In this case, the act of immigrating illegally is always prohibited because it unjust toward those who entered the country legally. Outlined in the constitution is the right of all citizens to succeed and have a fair opportunity. The act of accepting these illegal aliens will guarantee that jobs and other benefits will be taken away from taxpaying citizens. The citizens of the United States would also be subject to unjust treatment at the hands of these illegal immigrants by those that cross the border illegal and reap the benefits of a society that is too giving. Many times accommodations are made for those that do not assimilate into the country they are entering. These accommodations include health care, schooling, and monthly payments at the hands of tax payers. According to Lipsmeyer & Zhu (2011), in regards to domestic policy, increasing immigration can and will result in an increased burden on the society being oppressed. The mechanism that regulates increased immigration also must be examined and determined if it can sustain a large migration. Often times developed nations cannot support welfare and large amounts of illegal immigrants (p. 660). Although it would bring pleasure and happiness to those who do immigrate illegally, it simply cannot be permitted at any time. Kantian ethics also states that every action should be in accordance with
According to cultural relativism, a belief or action is relatively acceptable to their culture. In America, the culture is one of hard-work, prosperity, and dedication for all who follow and trust the process. Unfortunately, many people bypass this process and immigrate to the United States illegally. This issue directly defies the culture in the United States, and upsets many citizens who followed the process. Not only is this action prohibited in accordance to cultural relativism, it can even syphon opportunities from those who immigrated here legally. Along with the syphoning of production, many taxpayers are forced to pay for the benefits that these illegal immigrants acquire. The immigrants who come to the nation illegally often times refuse to assimilate, and can cause …show more content…
In this case, the act of immigrating illegally is always prohibited because it unjust toward those who entered the country legally. Outlined in the constitution is the right of all citizens to succeed and have a fair opportunity. The act of accepting these illegal aliens will guarantee that jobs and other benefits will be taken away from taxpaying citizens. The citizens of the United States would also be subject to unjust treatment at the hands of these illegal immigrants by those that cross the border illegal and reap the benefits of a society that is too giving. Many times accommodations are made for those that do not assimilate into the country they are entering. These accommodations include health care, schooling, and monthly payments at the hands of tax payers. According to Lipsmeyer & Zhu (2011), in regards to domestic policy, increasing immigration can and will result in an increased burden on the society being oppressed. The mechanism that regulates increased immigration also must be examined and determined if it can sustain a large migration. Often times developed nations cannot support welfare and large amounts of illegal immigrants (p. 660). Although it would bring pleasure and happiness to those who do immigrate illegally, it simply cannot be permitted at any time. Kantian ethics also states that every action should be in accordance with