This semester I read a book named Between the World and Me. The author wrote lots of events and details about a large number of African Americans were hurt or killed by police officers. It reminds me of once demonstration in November 2014. The cause of this demonstration was two young black men named Eric Garner and Michael Brown without arms were killed by American police officers. People took to the streets to express their sadness and indignation because the police officers took two black people’ lives away without prosecuted. The J.D. candidate from Yale Law School named Sommers Roseanna asserts that “A writer for Time magazine observed, ‘To many, a camera on Wilson’s uniform would have ended the uncertainty and potentially avoided the
…show more content…
A researcher named Vertesi Janet from the Time states, since the same photo can have different explanations from different people. From her experience works with the experts for 15 years, videos or photos from the camera can’t be evidence in an indictment (Vertesi N.PAG). But a new data from an authority research maintains that the camera evidence is conducive to the court. More than ninety-five percent of prosecutors agree with that the evidence from the camera helps them dispose of the case efficiently. It not only reminds the experiences of the police officers about the case, but also it can help the police officers affirm the exactitude of the report (Considering Police Body Cameras 1803). The convincing result of the research shows that the police officers use body camera when they are working indeed offer more valuable evidence for justice. It also helps the police offers recall their memory of the case. Consequently, requires the U.S. police officers wear body cameras when they are working is a momentous step of the progress of social development. It helps reduce the conflict between the citizens and the police officers. Furthermore, it not only can help the police officers correct some improper act and control they use force unduly, but also it becomes a new method to record evidence to protect the justice. Everyone’s life just has one, it can’t over again. The body camera protects citizens and keeps people away from the tragedies like Eric Garner and Michael
A researcher named Vertesi Janet from the Time states, since the same photo can have different explanations from different people. From her experience works with the experts for 15 years, videos or photos from the camera can’t be evidence in an indictment (Vertesi N.PAG). But a new data from an authority research maintains that the camera evidence is conducive to the court. More than ninety-five percent of prosecutors agree with that the evidence from the camera helps them dispose of the case efficiently. It not only reminds the experiences of the police officers about the case, but also it can help the police officers affirm the exactitude of the report (Considering Police Body Cameras 1803). The convincing result of the research shows that the police officers use body camera when they are working indeed offer more valuable evidence for justice. It also helps the police offers recall their memory of the case. Consequently, requires the U.S. police officers wear body cameras when they are working is a momentous step of the progress of social development. It helps reduce the conflict between the citizens and the police officers. Furthermore, it not only can help the police officers correct some improper act and control they use force unduly, but also it becomes a new method to record evidence to protect the justice. Everyone’s life just has one, it can’t over again. The body camera protects citizens and keeps people away from the tragedies like Eric Garner and Michael