In this advertisement the visual image being used is two children. One holding a piece of chocolate and one holding a gun that seems to be a classroom. The argument that’s being displayed I believe is that why should firearms be banned. The writer’s dialogue in the ad is successful in showing the argument. The fact that the writer gives the audience a choice of answering a question whether a child should have the option of protection or not brings people’s moral and opinion to this.
The strategy the writer uses in this ad is really effective he uses the two children to make the situation as if a shooter has infiltrated their school. So just like any school procedure the children have been told to go on lockdown. The two children are in their …show more content…
Also if school shootings are prevented we will have more time to identify exactly who might possibly need help. By help I mean people who think about shooting their or a school or college. We will avoid the situation for a person to go to jail and instead seeking care for their needs. There is nothing wrong for asking for help when you need it, especially if you are planning to put other lives at stake We should all be on the lookout for this so events like these shootings we have been having can be prevented. The reason why is because sometimes the people who need help won’t ask for it. So if we’re not on the lookout and they don’t seek for help and it happens then we as U.S citizens should have protection. What ends shootings are the law enforcement who have a firearm. In addition, sometimes the law enforcement doesn’t arrive on time and can’t save some lives. Therefore, should firearms be banned? No, they shouldn’t and it’s silly to think so. The Government needs to end the banning of firearm laws in our country. If anything they should make laws that support it in a positive matter for protection. I know many parents would agree that protection is the most important thing for their children. So it would be logical that we’d do that for them and for us as well since children are our future in our
The strategy the writer uses in this ad is really effective he uses the two children to make the situation as if a shooter has infiltrated their school. So just like any school procedure the children have been told to go on lockdown. The two children are in their …show more content…
Also if school shootings are prevented we will have more time to identify exactly who might possibly need help. By help I mean people who think about shooting their or a school or college. We will avoid the situation for a person to go to jail and instead seeking care for their needs. There is nothing wrong for asking for help when you need it, especially if you are planning to put other lives at stake We should all be on the lookout for this so events like these shootings we have been having can be prevented. The reason why is because sometimes the people who need help won’t ask for it. So if we’re not on the lookout and they don’t seek for help and it happens then we as U.S citizens should have protection. What ends shootings are the law enforcement who have a firearm. In addition, sometimes the law enforcement doesn’t arrive on time and can’t save some lives. Therefore, should firearms be banned? No, they shouldn’t and it’s silly to think so. The Government needs to end the banning of firearm laws in our country. If anything they should make laws that support it in a positive matter for protection. I know many parents would agree that protection is the most important thing for their children. So it would be logical that we’d do that for them and for us as well since children are our future in our