2016 Supreme Court Case Study

Improved Essays
The 2016 Campaign and the Supreme Court Niki Seemann

GOVT 2301

Federal Government

Professor: Michael Enders The 2016 Campaign and the Supreme Court
The 2016 Presidential Election has consisted of a high contrast between the Democratic and Republican parties. The Trump campaign highly appeals to the voters who are apprehensive of the country’s evolution over recent years (Decker, 2016). The Clinton campaign appeals to a vast array of minorities (Decker, 2016). In essence, the two campaigns are representative of “old America” and “new America,” as put by the LA Times writer Cathleen Decker. The differences in views between the two nominees bring the question: whom will the new president nominate for the Supreme Court?
…show more content…
This has made the Supreme Court a hot topic for the 2016 campaign. Being as the Court is currently split evenly between liberals and conservatives, the next Justice will shape the future of our country in helping to decide current and future issues. Donald Trump has released a list of around 21 names (Berke, 2016) he would consider nominating for the next Supreme Court justice, whereas Hilary Clinton has only laid out what her vision for the Supreme Court looks …show more content…
The issue for voters to consider here are how it will affect the country now and in the future. If we consider abortion, for example, and allow for the Republican party to take away a woman's right to make a choice having to do solely with her body, how will that change the future of America? Being founded on the basis of freedom—and freedom being what American’s love most about being an American—we can’t possibly believe that taking away a choice from someone is going to uphold the basis of American freedom. The Supreme Court has made leaps and bounds in the evolution of our country by allowing gay/lesbian marriages. Much like the abolishment of slavery, allowing the LGBT community to marry whomever they want is historical and inclusive, making them feel like they too can enjoy the freedoms of any other American. Gun control is another major issue, and the second amendment does need to be upheld, but how many more devastating gun crimes are the American people going to tolerate before more strict regulations are

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Judge Neil Gorsuch is the nominee that president Trump has nominated to serve as a supreme court justice. Judge Gorsuch was nominated to take the place of Justice Antonin Scale who unfortunately died while serving in office. This is somewhat of a rare occasion because it is not often a justice died while serving. It is even more extraordinary that it happened the same year the presidential election was scheduled to happen. When this rare occasion occurs, per article 2 of the constitution, this gives the president the power to nominate a justice the supreme court.…

    • 275 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It has been nearly a year since the death of Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia. In that time, we have witnessed a revolt by senate Republicans over Obama’s nominee Merrick Garland, a presidential election in which Republican’s promised a nominee to succeed Scalia, and now, the nomination of Neil Gorsuch. But who exactly is President Trump’s nominee? Neil Gorsuch, age 49, if confirmed, would become the youngest sitting Supreme Court Justice since Clarence Thomas was confirmed as an Associate Justice in 1981 under George H.W. Bush’s administration.…

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are five conservative justices and only three liberal justices from the remaining eight justices. In all likelihood, the five conservative justices are likely to vote to repeal affirmative action that would give them the majority. This is why selecting justices is such an important matter. The president selects a justice whenever a seat on the bench is open, and the appointed judge serves for life. As a president, you want someone that has similar political beliefs as you.…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Scorpions: An Analysis

    • 1161 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Over the course of his career, President Franklin Delano Roosevelt appointed a total of seven justices to the United States Supreme Court. Professor of Law at Harvard, and author, Noah Feldman, focuses on the background and evolution of four of FDR’s most influential justice appointees—Felix Frankfurter, Hugo Black, William O. Douglas, and Robert Jackson— throughout his book Scorpions. In the Supreme Court of FDR, and in our modern-day court, one often wonders how justices’ rulings are influenced. Throughout Scorpions, one may see FDR’s justices’ voting behavior demonstrates that a justice’s background, and their friendships, or vendettas against other members on the court, may impact voting behavior. In addition, there may be different degrees…

    • 1161 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Supreme Court Case Study

    • 945 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Court Case Review Throughout the years the United States government has been faced with several discussions. Some of these have become very important throughout history and have left a significate impact on society. These cases range from birth control privacy rights to equality. Among these cases are Griswold V. Connecticut, Baze V. Rees, and Brown V. Board of Education.…

    • 945 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jeffrey Toobin Essay

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Throughout the nonfiction book by Jeffrey Toobin, he talks about the justice system and the Supreme Court in the United States and how it functions and also how it has changed over the years in history. The book shows a great look at how individuals such as George W. Bush in how they hold their power and how the justice system affects that. Also giving a great understanding with Justice Sandra Day O'Connor's alienation. It also touches on the topic of a “fight” of conservatives that were taking control or trying to take control of the supreme court. Despite that there were many more republican appointees on the court it fails in the 80s and 90s.…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Clarence Thomas Essay

    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Clarence Thomas was appointed to the Supreme Court to replace Thurgood Marshall, however, regarding his stances, Thomas is practically the “anti-Thurgood”. Thomas approaches constitutional interpretation of the law through the “originalist” perspective, meaning this “philosophy calls for interpreting the Constitution by looking to the words in the document” (American progress). Thomas is one of the many Roman Catholics sitting on the Court and is also widely considered the most conservative. Clarence Thomas had been said to have specific policy preferences closer to that of an extreme conservative. Thomas is anti-gay marriage and he is against affirmative action.…

    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Even so, empirically proving Dahl’s original theory still raises important questions concerning the intended apolitical nature of Supreme Court. For example, if the policy preferences of a president are reflected in the votes of their court appointments, it would indicate that the two branches of government are far from being “truly distinct” as Alexander Hamilton envisioned in Federalist #78. Furthermore, it may also indicate that a president’s consideration of qualifications may be secondary in the appointment process, potentially resulting in a court that is politically partisan at the expense of being legally competent.…

    • 93 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Scalia sat in on a number of extremely important cases during his term which allowed him to right a number of strong opinions and dissents that are well known in the legal world. Some of Scalia’s more well-known opinions and dissents pertain to the following cases: District of Columbia v. Heller, Obergefell v. Hodges, National Labor Relations Board v. Noel Canning, Lawrence v. Texas, Kansas v. Marsh, King v. Burwell, and Planned Parenthood v. Casey. Scalia’s use of textualism becomes clear in these cases with the language he uses in his opinions and dissents. In District of Columbia v. Heller, Scalia authored an incredible majority opinion stating why the court decided the way it did. In his opinion Scalia argued that the term “militia” is…

    • 965 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Court Appointments and Criminal Justice Hillary Clinton: Hillary Clinton, if elected as president, will replace Antonin Scalia and will possibly have to fill Anthony M. Kennedy, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, and Stephen Breyer’s seats. Although Clinton has not released a short-list of possible supreme court judges, Clinton has gone on record that she would not name anyone who doesn’t support abortion on demand and consider Roe V. Wade settled law. Clinton also has said that she would appoint a judge that would overturn the Citizens United decision which gave interest groups free speech campaign rights. A large part of Clinton’s platform is to create criminal justice reform.…

    • 657 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As a matter of fact, Presidents tend to exclusively fill Supreme Court vacancies with Judges that they know will lean towards their respective political beliefs. For example, 1939 President Franklin Roosevelt forced the Court into a more political leaning by appointing four strong liberal judges. This was actually the start of the trend of Presidents forcing the Supreme Court to lean in their favor politically. While it is not uncommon for Supreme Court Justices to shift their political views during their term, it more common for them to stay positioned to their political…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    I am told that voting is a human right, personal freedom or any other term you want to use. I disagree. Right wing anarchists tend to argue that voting is coercive. This is wrong. When you vote you indirectly use the coercive powers of government but that may be too strong of a statement.…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Stomayor Speech Analysis

    • 1019 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Sonia Sotomayor, a judge, in her speech Opening Statement to The Senate Judiciary Committee, describes her past and her accomplishments such as all of her experience being a judge and her nomination into the supreme court by president Obama. She writes about her experiences and shares her accomplishments so that her audience sees why she is a good candidate to be in the supreme court. Sotomayor’s purpose is to persuade and seek the support of the judges and America for her election into the supreme court. She supports her purpose with rhetorical appeals such as ethos and pathos. Sotomayor uses an optimistic tone and rhetorical appeals in order to convey her audience to vote for her to be in the Supreme court.…

    • 1019 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Superior Court Case Study

    • 917 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Serena Pang Professor Karl A. Boedecker BUS 301 April 6, 2017 I. Court(s) visited: San Francisco Criminal Divisions of the Superior Court, which is located in 850 Bryant Street, San Francisco. II. Day(s) and Time(s) Thursday, March 23, 2017 at 1:30 p.m. III. Judge: I could not hear the name of the Judge.…

    • 917 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Throughout our history, there has been a concurring question, in which the burden has weighed heavy the shoulders of many citizens. Should Supreme Court judges be elected or appointed? In the process of this debate, a main concern of the overall argument shadows the question that if today’s method of selection is constitutional and publicly acceptable. In order to keep the public content and still have a reliable court system, there are many factors that are taken into place, which is also one of the reasons why the answer to this question has yet to be justified. In addition, there is an equal amount of supporters on either side who each claim their position is the most ethical and reasonable choice.…

    • 2056 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays