Fire can be seen as an intrusive, destructive force of nature and many can only see fire as a disadvantage phenomenon, but fire is an essential requirement for many ecosystems. This report looks at the consequences of fire on recovering forests of Australia. A survey was taken in 2011 at Anstey Hill in two different locations, one at the location where Ash Wednesday took place in 1983 and at another location where and uncontrolled fire took place in 1995. The survey looks at the recovery time of ground and canopy cover since the fires took place. After a controlled burn in the location of Ash Wednesday in 2012, another survey in 2015 shows the recovery once again of this site. By comparing these results with the 1995 bushfire site …show more content…
The percentage of ground litter cover after the 1983 fire site is greater than that of the 1995 fire site but shows a smaller percentage of moss cover compared to the 1995 fire from a survey in 2011. From figure 3 below, the graph shows the percentage of canopy cover at all heights from 1995 to cover a significantly larger area than that of the 1983 site. The comparison of the number of dead and alive eucalypt stems from after 1983 and 1995 sites is insignificant as they show little …show more content…
Figure 2 also shows a higher percentage of bare ground after the 2012 bushfire when compared to 1995. The canopy cover from both sights does not show great significance with the 1995 site having a slightly higher cover percentage than 2012. There is a great significance in dead eucalypt stems with nearly double the amount of dead stems per 100m2 after the 2012 burn site then the 1995 burn