1984 & Animal Farm Comparative Analysis 1984 and Animal Farm are two novels written by George Orwell. These two books overall want the same thing, obedience and total control. In 1984 we have our main character Winston Smith. He is a man who has no love for Big Brother. He does not agree with the rules and wants to rebel. Winston is a man who has no emotions; reason of the party. Big Brother is a dictator. He controls everything in Oceania. In Animal Farm we have the pigs who want to take control of the farm. Napoleon ends up being the leader. All animals are sick of the way that Jones treats them. They decide to rebel. In both books the main character(s) both attempt to rebel. Only one succeeds. Big Brother and Napoleon equally share the
…show more content…
They both want obedience and control, but most of all they both want power. In 1984, Big Brother has given a sense of fear that makes the characters in the book to have no emotion whatsoever. “When he got up to it he saw that a human hand severed at the wrist…He kicked the thing into the gutter, and then, to avoid the crowd, turned down a side street to the right (84).” The Party defeats anyone 's purpose of having any kind of emotion. This is the same as Animal Farm. “Instead--she did not know why--they had come to a time when no one dared speak his mind, when fierce, growling dogs roamed everywhere, and when you had to watch your comrades torn to pieces after confessing to shocking crimes. There was no thought of rebellion or disobedience in her mind (87).” The only emotion the animals have is fear. In both books the effects of both dictators cause the characters in both books to show no emotion toward anyone or themselves. While in both novels they have clear differences they have on similar goal for themselves. Big Brother wanted complete power. “The Party seeks power entirely for its own sake (263).” Napoleon wanted complete control. He thought he was the best. He wanted to be in control of everything. He thought he was more equal. “All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others (134).” In 1984 and Animal Farm the children and the dogs were taught at a young age to obey their …show more content…
Orwell as a writer probably shows this as not every novel will have a happy ending.”But it was all right, everything was alright, the struggle was finished. He had won the victory over himself. He loved Big Brother ( 1984 298).” “The creatures outside looked from pig to man, and from man to pig, and from pig to man again; but already it was impossible to say which was which (Animal Farm 141).” While both novels are similar in many ways they do have differences. 1984 was a more superior novel than Animal Farm. Big Brother as a leader took everything from his citizens. He never gave them a chance to explain themselves and in the end left everyone of them as nothing. Napoleon as a leader thought he was more superior than others. He was a leader that wanted nothing more than obedience and if you did not give it to him, he took your life away. Both leaders are very similar in wanting the same thing. Although, both leaders are not something you would want as someone who would control everything you did. Big Brother and Napoleon equally share the concept of wanting complete control and
They both want obedience and control, but most of all they both want power. In 1984, Big Brother has given a sense of fear that makes the characters in the book to have no emotion whatsoever. “When he got up to it he saw that a human hand severed at the wrist…He kicked the thing into the gutter, and then, to avoid the crowd, turned down a side street to the right (84).” The Party defeats anyone 's purpose of having any kind of emotion. This is the same as Animal Farm. “Instead--she did not know why--they had come to a time when no one dared speak his mind, when fierce, growling dogs roamed everywhere, and when you had to watch your comrades torn to pieces after confessing to shocking crimes. There was no thought of rebellion or disobedience in her mind (87).” The only emotion the animals have is fear. In both books the effects of both dictators cause the characters in both books to show no emotion toward anyone or themselves. While in both novels they have clear differences they have on similar goal for themselves. Big Brother wanted complete power. “The Party seeks power entirely for its own sake (263).” Napoleon wanted complete control. He thought he was the best. He wanted to be in control of everything. He thought he was more equal. “All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others (134).” In 1984 and Animal Farm the children and the dogs were taught at a young age to obey their …show more content…
Orwell as a writer probably shows this as not every novel will have a happy ending.”But it was all right, everything was alright, the struggle was finished. He had won the victory over himself. He loved Big Brother ( 1984 298).” “The creatures outside looked from pig to man, and from man to pig, and from pig to man again; but already it was impossible to say which was which (Animal Farm 141).” While both novels are similar in many ways they do have differences. 1984 was a more superior novel than Animal Farm. Big Brother as a leader took everything from his citizens. He never gave them a chance to explain themselves and in the end left everyone of them as nothing. Napoleon as a leader thought he was more superior than others. He was a leader that wanted nothing more than obedience and if you did not give it to him, he took your life away. Both leaders are very similar in wanting the same thing. Although, both leaders are not something you would want as someone who would control everything you did. Big Brother and Napoleon equally share the concept of wanting complete control and