12 Angry Men Sociology

Improved Essays
The film Twelve Angry Men starts with associate eighteen year recent child from the ghetto United Nations agency is unproved for the putting to death of his injurious father. A jury of twelve men is secured within the thought house to decide on the destiny of the young man. All confirmation is against the child and a liable call would send him to kick the bucket within the hot seat. This decide illuminates the attendants that they're confronted with a grave alternative which the court wouldn't ravish any demonstrations of kindness for the child if discovered blamable.

Indeed, even before the thought talks begin it's evident an outsized portion of the boys are certain the child is liable. However, once the introductory survey is taken juryman
…show more content…
Cobb) incorporates a sizable oblivious region. He incorporates a offended association together with his own kid that engrosses his contemplations. This is often insinuated in a very discussion between legal observer #7 (Jack Warden) and himself. Taking a goose at a photograph of him and his kid he says "haven't' seen him in 2 years, kids, you're employed your heart out… “Then he unexpectedly stops. The broken association together with his kid engrosses his contemplations as a number of times throughout the film he's discovered gazing at the ikon. His social vogue would be named a bigmouth. He’s neither open nor responsive. He has his conclusion and likes to share it. Cyber web result's a considerable visually impaired region. He unwilling or not capable to level with the others and is likewise unwelcoming to any criticism. All told chance the degree of those sentiments and therefore the impact it's on his observations is oblivious to him. Within the long haul, he gets himself the stand out maintaining a vote of blamable. He feels his feeling of the reality is being noted and it undermines him. This puts him edgy. He blasts, blaming the others for being insane. This fervid emission changes from biting outrage to dismal comprehension. His barriers begin to disintegrate as his oblivious feelings get to be clear to him. By perceiving his oblivious feelings, primarily what he has done is level with himself. Once he did this he understood …show more content…
somebody's lying within the drain… no one's reprimanding them, for that's their temperament, savage" he even goes ahead by locution "their awful, not a 1 of themes any good." it's dubious impotence Begley might see past his partiality keeping in mind the top goal to listen to the proof within the trial. His liable vote is given a task as presently as he finds out regarding the young men obstructed life within the ghettos. Whereas an outsized portion of the boys understand the shame joined to people from the ghetto they're willing to try to line the generalization aside. His upheaval has brought on a major unsettling influence within the area. This unsettling influence fills 2 wants. To start with, it provides the "not liable" safeguards with associate understanding that his partiality is that the purpose behind his resistance. It’s faithfully less complicated to overcome a grievance on the off probability that you simply notice what it's. Having this info takes into consideration a lot of profitable correspondence, on these lines persuading him that he need to amendment his vote. Also, it permits him to vent his disappointments. In doing in and of itself, he

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Boyz N The Hood Sociology

    • 559 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Boyz n the Hood Boyz n the Hood is a movie that depicts the typical life of gangs in the ghetto of South Central Los Angeles. A mother sends her son who seems to be passing through a wild teenage life to live with his father in South Central LA with the hope that he will instill some manners in him and hence grow into a mature man. Living in a ghetto even in the modern world has several challenges. For instance, children raised in such an environment easily turn out to be criminals and drug traffickers among others. As such, this paper analyzes Boyz n the Hood in terms of how gangs and the members are perceived.…

    • 559 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The movie I decided to write my research paper about is my all-time favorite football movie which is called Friday Night Lights and it is the true story of the Permian Panthers high school football team. The state of Texas is known for its size and even has its own sayings such as “Everything is bigger in Texas” and “Don’t mess with Texas. Well football is very well known in Texas and people really care about the sport. Every Friday night the small town of Odessa, Texas would be empty simply because everyone was at Ratliff Stadium watching their Permian Panthers.…

    • 2219 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “...It's a crash course in those passages of the Constitution that promise defendants a fair trial and the presumption of innocence. " 12 Angry Men" never states whether the defendant is innocent or guilty. It is about whether the jury has a reasonable doubt about his guilt.’” quoted by, well known critic Roger Ebert. The whole concept of Reasonable Doubt is that you should not vote guilty if there is any "reasonable doubt", no matter how sure other jurors are. In the book 12 Angry Men by Reginald Rose, one of the many themes is reasonable doubt.…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1 page 27) The wisdom of the 9th juror which has developed over the years through his experiences in life grants him insight which aids not only himself but some of the other jurors’ to come to terms with the innocence of the boy. Thus, the 9th juror’s age plays a major role in his decision-making.…

    • 673 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    12 Angry Men Reflection

    • 1164 Words
    • 5 Pages

    These twelve men of the jury will have to discuss and go over evidence to decide the boy 's fate. When the men sit down in the room it is very obvious that, most of the men do not want to be here. Also majority of the men think the boy is guilty, even without discussing the case. So they all take a vote on what the boys fate will be. Eleven of the jurors say death, but juror number eight votes not guilty.…

    • 1164 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    12 Angry Men is a compelling and profound film produced in 1957 directed by Sidney Lumet. This film set in a single room with just twelve cast member, these twelve play a jury called together to judge a murder case involving a young boy who is accused of murdering his father. The jury is charged with coming to a unanimous decision because the punishment is death penalty. Throughout the movie the cast is never referred to by name, rather by their jury numbers offering the viewer an air of mystery and intrigue. The film further shows its artistic talent by offering not only a story to challenge the mind but also the audience’s ethical beliefs.…

    • 1109 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Disagreements tend to happen often, which most likely causes arguments, threats, and other unpleasant actions. When a person does not agree with you, you automatically want to convince them otherwise. In the play ‘’12 angry men’’ all 12 men that are on jury have to come to an agreement of guilty or not guilty for a case of a nineteen year old male who is begin charge of murder. As soon as the play began one of the twelve men had already accused the boy as guilty without any discussion or evidence as the play continued he also makes remarks of the color of his skin and how he isn't a mature young man. I quote juror number ten “‘ You're gonna tell me were supposed to believe his kid, knowing what he is.”…

    • 343 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This statement by juror nine gives the viewers an understanding on how good juror eight appealed to the emotions of the others. He did not say that the boy wasn’t guilty; he provided evidence, and showed the others that there are possibilities that the boy did not kill his father. The discussion continues as they bring up the testimony of the witnesses of the murder. Juror eight appeals to the emotions of the jurors once again;…

    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Set in New York, 12 Angry Men follows twelve jurors as they decide whether or not a young 18-year-old Hispanic boy is guilty for stabbing his father in the chest. In a rather small room, the jurors must reach a unanimous decision, and if there is ‘reasonable doubt,’ the young boy will be freed. In one of the initial scenes, a vote is facilitated where 11 jurors find him guilty, and one juror, juror 8 votes that he is not guilty. He expresses to the group that a discussion needs to be made prior to sending a young boy to the death penalty. There is a lack of evidence which supports why the young 18-year-old boy stabbed his father and in turn leaves some of the minds of the jurors in a place where they are unable to convict within moral certainty.…

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Mill contends that opinions should not be expressed if this is done to cause mischief and that they are permissible to be expressed if they do not. He argues that it is justifiable that a man expresses a negative opinion towards the ownership of private property or states that merchants are the reason for poverty (Mill 52). Although controversial in nature, such opinions are not harming anyone and for this reason, should have the ability to circulate. However, the opinion is only justifiable in certain instances where the context of the situation affirms it is not inflicting harm on another individual or a group (Mill 16). To illustrate this point, Mill refers to a scenario in which the same opinion is expressed by a group of people which could lead to dangerous circumstances (e.g. mob outside of corn-dealers house).…

    • 2454 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Group culture impacts the dynamics of this group as they progress through Tuckman 's stages of development. While jurors share common values and beliefs about certain issues, the group is divided about others. Juror 3 for instance, believes that it is an open and shut case. He takes the matter quite seriously and is adamant that the defendant is guilty, which ten other jurors initially agree with him about. Juror 8 shares this seriousness by expressing concern about the weight of the decision and wants to discuss it in depth.…

    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The movie "12 angry Men" is about a jury who has the responsibility to decide whether a teenage is guilty of premeditate murder. At the beginning of the movie, the Judge speaks out to the jury saying that they must come out with a unanimous decision and that the jury has a "grave responsibility" because if found guilty, the boy will be condemn to electric chair. During the jury deliberation, we can identify and address the six steps of the group problem solving process and leadership. This process is really important because coming out with the solution like this one requires a very detail and cautious process.…

    • 810 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    12 Angry Men Thesis

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages

    What if you were on trial for first degree murder? In the movie 12 Angry Men by Reginald Rose, a young eighteen year old male was on trial for supposedly murdering his own father. The twelve men on the jury were faced with different opinions and facts that questioned their morals and values in life. I feel as if this movie did have “worth” in my life. I think the movie had worth because no one should ever be stereotyped, judged, and accused based on what other people say.…

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Groupthink In 12 Angry Men

    • 1168 Words
    • 5 Pages

    A juror states that "Kids that live in the slums are all criminals" (12 Angry Men, 1957). Another example of groupthink during the movie is when the jury talk about how the boy's father beat him and would smack him around. The jury say "This boy has been hit so many times that violence is a sort of affair to him" and also one of the jurors says "I would beat him up too if he was my kid" (12 Angry Men, 1975). Throughout the movie groupthink decreased but that was after several hours of deliberation which is when the theory of dialogue comes in to…

    • 1168 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Observe Juror #8 (Henry Fonda) as the leader. In the movie, Juror #8 is able to persuade his fellow jurors to change their opinions. Based on what you have learned in class, describe the leadership style he uses to do this. Present your analysis providing evidence from the film to support your position.…

    • 1362 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays