12 Angry Men Momentum

Decent Essays
Claim: The most important/significant message in 12 angry men is that momentum creates the majority. Establish Evidence: The story of 12 Angry Men starts out with the 8th juror being alone and having no one to back him up. Evidence: This is explained on page 12 from the 8th juror, “There were eleven votes for ‘guilty’.” Analysis: This scene symbolizes the theme of the story because it shows how there is absolutely no momentum or evidence to back up the not guilty side at first. This was a very strong part of the book because it really develops the 8th juror with how his personality is very calm, confident and empathetic. Reginald Rose makes those his personality traits to be able to stand against the ridicule of all the other judges. Establish …show more content…
I did.” Analysis: This reflects the theme of the story because this is the start of the momentum that begins to pick up and carry throughout the book with just one juror but soon more and more. Link: As a result, without juror 9 standing up and believing in juror 8, the boy (the victim) would have been sent to the electric chair and there would never have been a story. Establish Evidence: Later in the story, the 8th juror has continued to bring up major points and mold everyone’s opinion, besides juror 3, while staying neutral the whole time. Evidence: With this in mind, towards the end of the story on page 72 from the 3rd juror he says, “All right. ‘Not Guilty’.” Analysis: This reflects the theme because at the end of the story the 8th juror makes one final point with how the old lady had imprints on her nose from eyeglasses and that it could have impaired her vision when seeing the killing happen. This final point changes a total of 3 jurors all at once and this momentum keeps rolling and influences the final and most stubborn juror which happens to be the 3rd

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    This demonstrates prejudice because according to the 8th Juror, the 3rd Juror is being prejudice since he just desires the boy’s death for his own personal reasons. Additionally, the fact that he doesn’t refute it shows that it is probably true. Another time when the 3rd Juror demonstrates prejudice is at the end of the story. He states, “The phrase was “I’m gonna kill you.” That’s what he said.…

    • 202 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “...It's a crash course in those passages of the Constitution that promise defendants a fair trial and the presumption of innocence. " 12 Angry Men" never states whether the defendant is innocent or guilty. It is about whether the jury has a reasonable doubt about his guilt.’” quoted by, well known critic Roger Ebert. The whole concept of Reasonable Doubt is that you should not vote guilty if there is any "reasonable doubt", no matter how sure other jurors are. In the book 12 Angry Men by Reginald Rose, one of the many themes is reasonable doubt.…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Standing up alone for what you believe is right is a hard thing for anyone to do, adults in a jury or teenagers in high school. Twelve Angry Men by Reginald Rose details the deliberation of a jury over the fate of a sixteen year old boy accused of killing his father. When the jury first attempts to take a vote on whether the verdict should be innocent guilty, the vote is eleven to one in favor of guilty with Juror Eight standing alone on the side of innocence. He then proceeds to prove to the other jurors why the boy is innocent using the evidence presented during the trial as well as his own arguments. Twelve Angry Men should be read in schools because it demonstrates the need to make decisions based on your personal morals, make non-prejudiced…

    • 1071 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1 page 27) The wisdom of the 9th juror which has developed over the years through his experiences in life grants him insight which aids not only himself but some of the other jurors’ to come to terms with the innocence of the boy. Thus, the 9th juror’s age plays a major role in his decision-making.…

    • 673 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The delivery of a righteous and just verdict is depicted in Reginald Rose 's naturalistic play, Twelve Angry Men. On the surface, the use of rationality and morality is demonstrated to create an honest deliberation of justice. However, despite this depiction of the American jury system, Rose raises an awareness of the questionable integrity and efficacy of the jurors and the jury system. On a deeper aspect, Rose underscores human subjectivity as the main inhibitor to a righteous judgment, whilst showcasing the solutions to combat this intrinsic nature. Through this, Rose elucidates his humanistic view to the audience that in order to achieve justice, one must not only approach judicial conflicts with humility but to also critically questioning…

    • 1071 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Questions On 12 Angry Men

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages

    NAME: Swathesh Shetty DATE: 12/10/2015 Leadership for Global Citizenship Questionnaire for the movie “12 Angry Men” 1. In one or two sentences, answer the following: a) What is the purpose of the 12 person jury? The purpose of the 12 person jury is to unanimously decide whether the accused is guilty or not guilty of the offence for killing his father based on the data and evidence gathered during the trail in the court.…

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his play Twelve Angry Men, Reginald Rose brings us back in time to 1957, to a jury room of a New York Court of Law where one man, Juror #8, confronts the rest of the jury to look at a homicide case without prejudice, and ultimately convinces Juror #2, a very soft-spoken man who at first had little say in the deliberation. Throughout the play, several jurors give convincing arguments that make one think about whether the boy is “guilty” or “not guilty.” Ultimately, one is convinced by ethos, logos, and pathos. We can see ethos, logos, and pathos having an effect on Juror #2 as he begins as a humble man and changes into someone brave at the end. Although all three modes play a part in convincing Juror #2, pathos is the most influential because…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Juror eight appealed to the jury’s values. He told a story about the innocent boy (innocent when he was young) being harmed as he was growing up. The boy was beaten by his dad when he was young. Juror eight did a tremendous job of appealing to the emotions of the others; as his approach changes the minds of the jurors. For example, Juror number nine says “this gentleman has been standing alone against us, he doesn’t say the boy isn’t guilty, he just isn’t sure” (12 angry men 1957).…

    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The film 12 Angry Men is a dramatization of twelve men that serve as a jury in a trial for a teenage boy accused of murdering his father. The film explores the complications that may cloud the judgment of everyday men as they deliberate the guilt or exoneration of the defendant on the basis of reasonable doubt. The decision must be unanimous for a guilty verdict will result in a mandatory death sentence. The jury of twelve is tasked with the ethical responsibility of patiently reviewing the evidence of the case; to fully understand the impact of their decision and then enter a judgment without personal bias. The ethical dilemma the jury is faced with is the question of whether they are fulfilling their ethical responsibilities or are they serving their own interests?…

    • 609 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The justice system of America is constantly criticized for being unfair. The establishment of an unfair justice system is due to bias and bigotry. The play Twelve Angry Men by Reginald Rose shows the prejudices of the system as twelve different men, from different past, must concur and make a verdict on a murder case. The author indicates that the justice system is unfair through biases portrayed in the juror’s dialogue, past history, and attitude in making a verdict.…

    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Several of the jurors get up to see it better.)” (Rose 39). The actions of the jury demonstrate that although they might not care as much as they should for the boy since Juror #8 cares, they are willing to listen. Juror #8 argues the evidence given throughout the trial to prove not guilty with reasonable doubt. This sets both plays a part in the sense that John does not have supporting evidence to prove his ideas while Juror #8…

    • 1270 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Guilty or not guilty is a life threatening question for an eighteen-year-old boy in the film 12 Angry Men who has been tried for a first-degree murder. The eighteen-year-old boy has been accused of stabbing his own father and the case has been left in the hands of a twelve-man jury in which a guilty verdict mean the automatic death of the boy. Throughout the film, we are able to recognize various communication skills that the twelve individuals display. Leadership There are two types of leaders shown in this film. Since the beginning of the film juror number eight demonstrated to be an emergent leader by not being a follower even though he was the only one who pleaded not guilty and was willing to stand alone against the rest of the jury who pleaded guilty.…

    • 1197 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The movie "12 angry Men" is about a jury who has the responsibility to decide whether a teenage is guilty of premeditate murder. At the beginning of the movie, the Judge speaks out to the jury saying that they must come out with a unanimous decision and that the jury has a "grave responsibility" because if found guilty, the boy will be condemn to electric chair. During the jury deliberation, we can identify and address the six steps of the group problem solving process and leadership. This process is really important because coming out with the solution like this one requires a very detail and cautious process.…

    • 810 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    12 Angry Men Thesis

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages

    I feel strongly about that because the movie made me question what I believed to be true based on what other people said rather than forming my own thoughts. In the movie 12 Angry Men the twelve men at first sat down and took an outloud vote on whether they thought the defendant was guilty or not guilty. The law was that it had to be all twelve for one or the…

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Except for juror number eight, peer pressure impaired their judgment. Based on his maturity level it indicated that the greatest differences are found in juror number eight and three. Once juror (Jack) changed his vote from guilty to not guilty only because the rest of them eventually voted not guilty also. It showed many times that the several jurors changed their minds from not guilty to guilty and vice versa under peer pressure, and overpowering of the strong willed ones.…

    • 1416 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays