And the same knife was with juror 8th. He purchased it in a pawn shop two blocks from where the boy lived a few night prior, shattering the claim that the knife was so unique and identifiable. All the jurors got surprises by juror 8th when he presented an identical knife. They were surprised but still unsure so juror 8th tell everyone if they would vote again to see if they still vote the same and if they do it so then he would not stand alone and go along with others jurors veridically. They all agreed with that and continue with voting by secretly. So the results of this time was that 10 people vote “guilty” out of 2 “not guilty” and it turns on the 5th juror, accusing him of having changed his vote out of sympathy for the boy. Immediately, also the juror 9th stands and admits to having changed his vote because he’d like to hear the arguments out and see what’s happen. So the discussion continues until the 2nd evidence starts …show more content…
Before they were talking about the old woman, another vote was taken, and the jury is now six to six. The other thing was that Juror 8th was discussing about the testimony of that police officer who arrested the defendant because he was unable to name the movies that he had claimed of watching it that evening, so juror 8th says maybe the defendant forgot the name of the movies and who was in the movies because of being under the great emotional distress. Also the another was that the discussion about the switchblade, the jurors were questioning that whether or not the defendant would have made the stab wound, down and in which would be difficult for the boy’s knowledge and experience with of how using such a knife. The last thing was that the jurors take the vote and it's nine to three now, all the other jurors but the 3rd, 4th, and 10th juror are not in the favor of not guilty until they discussed the 3rd evidence, after that they changed their votes and it was 11 to 1. So the 3rd juror stands alone until what happens next in the