12 Angry Men Jury Analysis

Improved Essays
The play is set in a New York City Court of Law jury room. The play opens to the empty jury room, and the Judge’s voice is heard. The judge is giving a set of final instructions to the twelve jurors. It’s a murder case, the jurors have to find if the boy is guilty for the murder of his own father and that if it requires sentence for the defend to be death penalty. After all these instructions and all other things that jurors did taking a short break, complaint about the room it’s hot, without air conditioning and the fan also doesn’t work too. So all the jurors assume the obvious guilt of the defendant, whom has been accused of killing his father. Eventually, the twelve sit down and a vote is taken. All the jurors vote “guilty,” except for …show more content…
And the same knife was with juror 8th. He purchased it in a pawn shop two blocks from where the boy lived a few night prior, shattering the claim that the knife was so unique and identifiable. All the jurors got surprises by juror 8th when he presented an identical knife. They were surprised but still unsure so juror 8th tell everyone if they would vote again to see if they still vote the same and if they do it so then he would not stand alone and go along with others jurors veridically. They all agreed with that and continue with voting by secretly. So the results of this time was that 10 people vote “guilty” out of 2 “not guilty” and it turns on the 5th juror, accusing him of having changed his vote out of sympathy for the boy. Immediately, also the juror 9th stands and admits to having changed his vote because he’d like to hear the arguments out and see what’s happen. So the discussion continues until the 2nd evidence starts …show more content…
Before they were talking about the old woman, another vote was taken, and the jury is now six to six. The other thing was that Juror 8th was discussing about the testimony of that police officer who arrested the defendant because he was unable to name the movies that he had claimed of watching it that evening, so juror 8th says maybe the defendant forgot the name of the movies and who was in the movies because of being under the great emotional distress. Also the another was that the discussion about the switchblade, the jurors were questioning that whether or not the defendant would have made the stab wound, down and in which would be difficult for the boy’s knowledge and experience with of how using such a knife. The last thing was that the jurors take the vote and it's nine to three now, all the other jurors but the 3rd, 4th, and 10th juror are not in the favor of not guilty until they discussed the 3rd evidence, after that they changed their votes and it was 11 to 1. So the 3rd juror stands alone until what happens next in the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    He was one of the most timid Juror, and since he shared similar background with the defendant, Juror 8 made personal connection with him and seeked his consultation (consistently asking him for his opinion). After the trial he voted guilty because he felt everyone else thought the same too, he was not the kind of person who had a strong stand like Juror No.8. But at some level he was confident about his decision (guilty) since, he did not change his vote (during the second vote) even after he was insulted by other Jurors about his origin. The reason for not changing his decision maybe he felt that it was not right to let a murderer out in the street because he was offended by other Jurors.…

    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Except for juror number eight, peer pressure impaired their judgment. Based on his maturity level it indicated that the greatest differences are found in juror number eight and three. Once juror (Jack) changed his vote from guilty to not guilty only because the rest of them eventually voted not guilty also. It showed many times that the several jurors changed their minds from not guilty to guilty and vice versa under peer pressure, and overpowering of the strong willed ones.…

    • 1416 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Juror #2 finds it “interesting that he’d find a knife exactly like the one the boy bought”(24). Afterwards, the 8th Juror suggests that the elderly man, one of the witnesses, lied because of the point Juror #3 tried to make. Juror #3 says, that the elderly man “[ran] to his door and [saw] the kid tearing down the stairs fifteen seconds after the killing”(42). Juror #8 then suggests that the elderly man could not have done that because of his stroke. He then decides to recreate what the elderly man said he did on the night of the murder.…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After all the jurors voted “not guilty”. Even though it took juror #3 to be the last to declare “not…

    • 862 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Okay. Eleven to one, guilty.” (Rose 4). At first glance, all the jurors excluding Juror #8, view the boy as guilty. They claim that this is due to the evidence they were presented with, but it is also related to their bias and the fact that they want to go home as early as possible.…

    • 1270 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    First of all, they start talking about the knife that was used to kill the victim. All evidence points out that the knife was purchased by the boy and that he used it to kill his dad. Even though the boy said that he lost the knife, the jury is convinced that it is the same knife because it is a very rare and unique one, but then the juror #8 takes out of his pocket and exact look like knife, staying that he bought it at a pawn shop at the boy’s neighborhood pointing out that there is a possibility that anyone could have used a similar knife to kill the victim. At this moment some of the men start to doubt about their judgement. Then, juror #8 calls out for another voting, so they can find out if somebody has change his mind.…

    • 810 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Week 2 Application Assignment: Group Dynamics and Group Stages In 1965, Bruce Tuckman developed one of the most influential models of “the developmental stages in a small group” (Bonebright, 2010, p. 111). It is a four stage model in which each stage needed to be completed in order to reach optimum group functioning. These stages were dubbed “forming”, “storming”, “norming”, “performing”. Later in 1977, he and Mary Ann Conover Jensen added “adjourning” as a fifth stage in his model (Bonebright, 2010).…

    • 1692 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This statement by juror nine gives the viewers an understanding on how good juror eight appealed to the emotions of the others. He did not say that the boy wasn’t guilty; he provided evidence, and showed the others that there are possibilities that the boy did not kill his father. The discussion continues as they bring up the testimony of the witnesses of the murder. Juror eight appeals to the emotions of the jurors once again;…

    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1 page 27) The wisdom of the 9th juror which has developed over the years through his experiences in life grants him insight which aids not only himself but some of the other jurors’ to come to terms with the innocence of the boy. Thus, the 9th juror’s age plays a major role in his decision-making.…

    • 673 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After voting for the first time, Juror Three proclaims, “When he was sixteen we had a battle. He hit me in the face. He's big, y'know. I haven't seen him in two years. Rotten kid” (Rose 18).…

    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Juror 3 Analysis

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages

    but there is time constraint and group think has been taken place in the movie. Juror 3 is a biased against the 19-year old boy and he stands strongly in his vote of guilty. As a juror, he has an expected to assist the judge to give a fair trial.…

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    12 Angry Men Reflection

    • 1164 Words
    • 5 Pages

    These twelve men of the jury will have to discuss and go over evidence to decide the boy 's fate. When the men sit down in the room it is very obvious that, most of the men do not want to be here. Also majority of the men think the boy is guilty, even without discussing the case. So they all take a vote on what the boys fate will be. Eleven of the jurors say death, but juror number eight votes not guilty.…

    • 1164 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Groupthink In 12 Angry Men

    • 1168 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Also, the members of the jury questioned the testimony of the old man. They questioned how the old man ran to the door and down the hall in such a short amount of time, yet he drug his leg when he walked and had a stroke the previous year. The jury questioned why the boy could not remember what movie he was supposedly at. They thought his knife was very unusual until one of the jurors bought the same exact knife for cheap right beside the boys house. The jury questioned how the women across the street could see into the window without wearing her glasses and they questioned how she turned over in bed at just the right time that she saw the murder happen.…

    • 1168 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    12 Angry Men Negotiation Analysis

    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages
    • 1 Works Cited

    During their whole dispute, they come up with different ways to settle arguments, including going around the table and giving each person a chance to explain why they voted guilty or innocent and using evidence to prove one's point. Juror 8 always had evidence to back up his reasons, which convinced the others that maybe the boy is innocent. The ultimate resolution comes after everyone gives their input and puts all of the pieces together. They gain a different perspective which changes their thoughts on everything. After a long day, they…

    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages
    • 1 Works Cited
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of the main topics that was displayed in the movie was conformity. Conformity can be described as the act of changing one’s behavior to fit in with a group (Crutchfield, 1955). After the closing arguments of the trial, deliberations by the jurors begin on whether the boy is guilty or not. As the jurors make themselves comfortable in the jury room, casual exchanges are made between the jurors. This is where the first step of conformity takes place.…

    • 884 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays