12 Angry Men Group Polarization

Improved Essays
Group polarization is relevant to the group processes seen in the film 12 Angry Men. This process could potentially have a disastrous effect on the group’s processes and ensure fairness does not prevail. Group polarization is the tendency for members of a deliberating group to move to a more extreme position with the direction of the shift determined by the majority or average of member’s pre-deliberation preferences (Forsyth 382). This shift is typically based on social influence processes including social comparison, persuasion, and social identity (Forsyth 382). Those who left the courtroom with an inclination towards guilty most likely kept voted guilty and those who were undecided most likely sided with the majority. Why does group polarization

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The article, Minority Matters: 12 Angry Men as a Case Study of a Successful Negotiation, by Eirini Flouri and Yiannis Fitsakis, meticulously analyses multiple strategies and angles taken by juror 8 in the film 12 Angry Men. The article examines what factors contributed to juror 8’s success and the ever changing tactics juror 8 uses to gain supporters for his cause. The negotiation is held to decide the fate of an eighteen year old minority, which allegedly murdered his father. The elements surrounding the negotiation are 12 jurors in a hot conference room, no relationships formed prior to negotiation and none expected or necessarily desired as an outcome. The jurors answer only to themselves and to the law, grounded in the expectation by…

    • 658 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Partisanship Polarization

    • 1478 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Sunstein and Hastie suggest that individuals become more polarized when they associate only with those who share the same political beliefs. Thus, an individual’s beliefs will intensify and they will identify as either more Republican or more Democratic dependent upon their original political identity. Sunstein and Hastie contribute the growing partisan divide on the groupthink phenomena rather than changing ideological beliefs. Thus, as the political parties become more divided along partisan lines the groupthink phenomena will continue to widen the…

    • 1478 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It’s a daunting place the courtroom, to think this is the same place that criminals get prosecuted, charged for committing murder, domestic violence, there all prosecuted here, so what does that make me? Am I nothing but a murderer or rapist. I walk into the courtroom, it’s airy, a layer of silence blankets the room, I walk pass Jase's mother, she stares me down, guilt rushes over my body. I know all too well what she thinks of me, and what Jase's situation would be like if I were just to come forward as that third man. I look over to the Lamb, he gives me a reassuring nod, he’s ready to take a bullet for me, go down with a prosecution that could set him back years, and leave a big black mark on his file, the jobs that he could miss out on his future in pieces.…

    • 462 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    12 Angry Men Bias

    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In Life, people can have biases of someone's race, religion, or background. Both Twelve Angry Men (Rose’s Drama) and “Racial Bias Among Jurors at Heart of Supreme Court Case” (Liptak’s Article) deal with Judgement based on somebody’s background. In Twelve Angry Men a bunch of rich, white jurors tries to solve a case about a slum boy who supposedly killed his own father, and in Liptak’s Article, a group of jurors decides whether an individual is guilty or not and the thing that they judge him about is his race. However, despite the similarities of this novel and article, there are many differences as well. Twelve Angry Men, which took place in the ‘50s, is fictional, and has to do with judging someone because of their background, while Liptak’s…

    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The article “Good people do Bad Things” was written by Anne Trafton. This article explains that people don’t always act rationally when they’re in group settings rather than alone. Anne emphasizes that the brain acts differently because it is stuck in a “mob mentality”. She started studying this affect after she found herself on the other side of a hostile situation versus a large crowd. The author’s strategies are very effective as far as I can see; most all theories are backed by facts and statistics.…

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Questions On 12 Angry Men

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages

    NAME: Swathesh Shetty DATE: 12/10/2015 Leadership for Global Citizenship Questionnaire for the movie “12 Angry Men” 1. In one or two sentences, answer the following: a) What is the purpose of the 12 person jury? The purpose of the 12 person jury is to unanimously decide whether the accused is guilty or not guilty of the offence for killing his father based on the data and evidence gathered during the trail in the court.…

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The film Twelve Angry Men (1957) exhibited the power of an eyewitness, the characteristics of the defendant, and the power of group influence that affects the jury. Throughout the film, the reliability of the eyewitness was questioned. There were two eyewitnesses in the movie, the old man, who lives in the apartment below of the crime scene, and the old woman, who lives across the street. According to the film, there is a possibility that the eyewitnesses misinformed the jury about the crime scene. Eyewitnesses may not be as reliable as they are thought to be.…

    • 977 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Guilty or not guilty is a life threatening question for an eighteen-year-old boy in the film 12 Angry Men who has been tried for a first-degree murder. The eighteen-year-old boy has been accused of stabbing his own father and the case has been left in the hands of a twelve-man jury in which a guilty verdict mean the automatic death of the boy. Throughout the film, we are able to recognize various communication skills that the twelve individuals display. Leadership There are two types of leaders shown in this film. Since the beginning of the film juror number eight demonstrated to be an emergent leader by not being a follower even though he was the only one who pleaded not guilty and was willing to stand alone against the rest of the jury who pleaded guilty.…

    • 1197 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is uncommon to observe somebody who likes to be compelled to be some place or accomplish something they don 't have a longing to do. In, 12 Angry Men, we are given only that. Twelve men, of every single different backgrounds and experiences are told they must spend their own valuable time to judge a man on the premise of evidence that was presented to them. Gladding would call this kind of group an errand/work aggregate. This sort of group meets up to finish amass undertaking objectives.…

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Groupthink is a psychological Phenomenon that occurs within a group in decision making. It occirs when a group of people gather together to make a decision. In group think there is no clear rule for decision making. Everyone in groupthink usually have similar backgrounds. The whole group takes an action together to prove themselves.…

    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The movie "12 angry Men" is about a jury who has the responsibility to decide whether a teenage is guilty of premeditate murder. At the beginning of the movie, the Judge speaks out to the jury saying that they must come out with a unanimous decision and that the jury has a "grave responsibility" because if found guilty, the boy will be condemn to electric chair. During the jury deliberation, we can identify and address the six steps of the group problem solving process and leadership. This process is really important because coming out with the solution like this one requires a very detail and cautious process.…

    • 810 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The film 12 Angry Men is about a jury who struggles to set aside their individual prejudices to determine the guilt or innocence of a man accused of premeditated murder. The main character is juror #8 who is played by Henry Fonda. The film focuses on labeling theory and how that influences a juror’s opinions and thoughts. It is extremely interesting to watch how most of the jurors had their minds made up about the case even before deliberation; however, as the film progresses the jurors stop labeling the defendant and instead make their verdict decision based on facts. The audience can see from this film that labeling an individual in the 1950’s might have been common, and unfortunately I believe that it still exists in today’s…

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Factors that cause deindividuation include anonymity, responsibility, group membership and size, and arousal. However, Postmes and Spears’ meta-analysis of 60 studies (1998) does not support Zimbardo’s theory and instead suggests that factors that affect deindividuation “decrease variability of people’s actions in collectives.” Postmes and Spears’ analysis is also supportive of the emergent norm theory, norms that emerge from a crowd due to the actions of a few key dominant group members. The Theory argues that group behavior is not out of control, but is socially structured by a temporary norm. In the Experiment, it may seem as if the events were out of control.…

    • 967 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    A group is defined as “a collection of two or more interacting individuals who maintain a stable patterns of relationship, share common goals, and perceive themselves as being a group.” (Greenberg, p. 251). In the movie 12 Angry men (1957), twelve random jurors converge to form a jury committee. They are tasked with an important job of preparing a verdict in the case of sixteen-year-old teenager, who is accused with first degree murder of his father. They are to “separate facts from fancy” and “under good conscience”, reach at a decision of ether “guilty” or “not-guilty” unanimously.…

    • 1488 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The movie, 12 Angry Men is about twelve white men deciding the jail sentence of an 18-year old boy who has allegedly committed murder by killing his father. If the men do decide the boy is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt then the boy will be sent to an electric chair for a death sentence. In the very few scenes of the movie all the jurors are summoned into one room and standing towards the door. Juror number 1, also known as the foreman is the leader of the deliberation. He tells everyone to gather around a table and explains that the goal of the day’s deliberation is to vote on the sentence of the boy’s guiltiness and innocence.…

    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays