12 Angry Men Essay

The current study examined inconsistencies between the gender of the accused rapist and verdicts determined by jurors. It was hypothesized that the gender of the defendant suspected of being a rapist would significantly make a set of jurors be prejudiced in their decision-making in their verdicts such as the case of females that are usually not perceived as rapists. The study involved using a sample of female and male suspected rapists (N = 60) from a court of law. Participants reported their verdicts made by the group of jurors as either guilty or not guilty. These individuals’ genders and verdicts were measured using a chi-square for analysis. The nominal variables were assessed via the calculated values in addition to finished output generated in the tests. Results supported the hypothesis and suggested significant inconsistencies between the status of the accused rapist’s gender and judgement of guilty or not guilty established by jurors. Quantified data on verdicts and the defendant’s gender demonstrated significance that maintains the hypothesis. Based on the results, modifications to judgements will have to be …show more content…
Data on gender were available for rape cases from a total of 714,307 for most serious conviction offenses. It affirms how men comprised of ninety-eight percent but women uphold only two percent out of one hundred percent of these kinds of cases in the United States’ population (See Table 1).

The purpose of the study was to examine verdicts decided by a group of jurors concerning the gender of the suspected rapist in a court of law. It was hypothesized that the gender of an accused rapist would be predictive of Jurors rendering guilty or not guilty