12 Angry Men Character Analysis Essay

Improved Essays
Characters with widely different personalities and beliefs create a number of diverse and tense relationships among characters in the play 12 Angry Men written by Reginald Rose. Some may argue that bringing past prejudices into a case where a man's life is at stake is unwise; however, this is inevitable. Each person has different morals and knowledge, as well as bigotry and prejudice, this provides for heated and opinionated debates. Would you really want a jury of only trained lawyers of the same background? Having different people makes others question their own opinions and ultimately makes everyone deliberate for quite some time until a final verdict is reached. One prime demonstration of this is seen between jurors eight, two, and three. …show more content…
He’s calm, knows how to argue while still maintaining his cool, and has a strong sense of morality that does not waiver. He is also the only completely static character. While the other eleven jurors decide the defendant is guilty with nothing more than a brief glance at the case, juror eight says, “It’s not so easy for me to raise my hand and send a boy off to die without talking about it first.”(12 Angry Men). This is only one of the many examples of juror eight’s compassion for his fellow man and investment to the case. As seen in diagram one, juror eight’s figure has a light blue outline, which shows his gentle and calm manner. The orange in the middle of the diagram represents his intelligence. Juror eight changes the outcome of the case entirely. Diagram one represents him as a circle due to calm demeanor and intelligence. Some may say that proving such a large number of stubborn people wrong may be impossible without being tyrannical. Nevertheless, juror eight’s way of persuasion deserves nothing but praise. “I’m not trying to make anyone accept it. I’m just saying it’s possible.”( 12 Angry Men). Juror eight tries to make the other jurors question themselves, not shove his opinion down their throats. This is a remarkable feat when his peers are so obstinate. The lightning bolts in the diagram represent his power and persuasiveness over the other

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    There is a reasonable doubt in my mind.” (Rose 62) Juror #8 was able to argue using the facts to persuade his fellow jurors to see the boy as innocent so that they did not send an innocent man to his death. Our judicial system worked in this play and we received a fair verdict for the boy that was charged. However, The Crucible ended differently, eventually leading John Proctor to say, “ You have made your magic now, for now, I do think I see some shred of goodness in John Proctor. Not enough to wave a banner with, but white enough to keep it from such dogs.” (Miller 144) Proctor is saying here that by keeping silent and not admitting to a crime he didn’t commit it makes him a better person, he has kept his soul and not sold it to save his himself. He will not be persuaded to abandon who he is but stand by the fact that he knows he is innocent and the people who are sending him to be hung are the real witches.…

    • 1680 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He is racism, not proper thinker, abusive, prejudice, arrogant, insensitive and biased. Most of jurors doesn't like him based on his opinion and speech was disturbs the rest of juror. Changes his mind when all the others jurors are against him and specifically when jury 4 tells him to keep quite and not to speak. Juror 11 was interested to be a jury because he has witnessed great injustices that happen before. He was described as a good decision maker, rational thinker, supportive, team player, open-minded, agreeable and good natured.…

    • 1243 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This man is practically the whole reason why everyone questions their decisions of the boy. He saw no reason as to why they shouldn’t sit in and talk a little about the case before shipping someone off to their death. Referring to figure 1, notice that Juror 8 is a speech bubble. He takes on this role due to the fact he was the only one not afraid to stand out and make an opinion upon the other eleven jurors. “There were eleven votes for guilty.…

    • 1288 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why would he lie? What’s he got to gain, Nine: Attention maybe?” Eight makes a good statement when saying that the Old man’s view doesn’t make sense due to the El train blocking his view and hearing. Nine tends to agree with Eight saying that the old ma In the beginning of the play almost every Juror in the room picks “Guilty” except for Juror Eight. He believes that the boy is “Not-Guilty” saying that the evidence is somewhat false. Of course the other Jurors don’t believe it.…

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Juror 7 demonstrates this passivity in 12 Angry Men when he abruptly changes his vote to not guilty. While being questioned for it, the only reasoning her gives is that he wanted to get the deliberations over with. Juror 7 displays his disregard for what happens in the trial and dissolves his opinion on what he believes to be true. He allows Juror 8 to easily persuade him without…

    • 1134 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He yells at people a lot when someone disagrees with him. Juror number three also ignores juror eight’s concerns about the case and talks about the facts rather than what might have actually happened. If someone is a lot like juror number three, they might make a great businessman, but they will never have very many…

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Having different people makes others question their own opinions and ultimately makes everyone deliberate for quite some time until a final verdict is reached. One prime demonstration of this is seen between jurors eight, two, and three. They…

    • 1199 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Juror eight did a tremendous job of appealing to the emotions of the others; as his approach changes the minds of the jurors. For example, Juror number nine says “this gentleman has been standing alone against us, he doesn’t say the boy isn’t guilty, he just isn’t sure” (12 angry men 1957). This statement by juror nine gives the viewers an understanding on how good juror eight appealed to the emotions of the others. He did not say that the boy wasn’t guilty; he provided evidence, and showed the others that there are possibilities that the boy did not kill his father. The discussion continues as they bring up the testimony of the witnesses of the murder.…

    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the story Twelve Angry Men the jurors initially cast their ballots based upon prejudice, pressure, and manipulation. As juror number Eight begins to force these eleven men of the jury to reason we come closer to a verdict that more closely resembles justice. When being asked why he believes the boys story number Eight responds “I don’t know whether I believe it or not. Maybe I don’t”. this line of thinking is akin to Socrates whom is quoted saying “True knowledge exists in knowing that you know nothing”.…

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As for NO.8 he still stuck to not guilty, but he requested “I want to call for a vote. I want eleven men to vote by secret ballot. I’ll abstain. If there are still eleven votes for guilty, I won’t stand alone. We’ll take in a guilty verdict right now.” This was really dumb of him because he shouldn’t allow them to change his mind.…

    • 549 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays