'12 Angry Men' By Reginald Rose

Improved Essays
“12 Angry Men” is originally a movie, written by Reginald Rose, which was later turned into a play. Reginald Rose is known for his work in 12 Angry Men and Escape from Sobibor. Rose had his roots in New York City, the business capital of the world, during the early 1920’s. He passed away in Connecticut after a long and healthy 82 years.
A young man’s life hangs in the balance on the scales of justice. Only 12 hot, tired, and angry, jurors stand between him and a guilty sentence. All of which are convinced man is guilty far past a reasonable doubt, except one juror. When the vote is taken, they tally 11:1. The jurors are irritable and just want to go home, which makes them react rather negatively to this vote. Eventually, this juror changes

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Innocent Until Proven Guilty “A person is innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.” In the play, Twelve Angry Men by Reginald Rose, an 18-year-old boy is on trial for the murder of his father. After many pieces of evidence were presented, the three that are shaky include the position the knife was in, the man hearing the boy threaten his father, and the woman who is in question because of her glasses. Based on these, the boy is not guilty. One piece of evidence that proves the boy’s innocence is the stab wound.…

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Twelve Angry Men by Reginald Rose, an 18-year-old is on trial for the murder of his farther. After many pieces of evidence were presented, the three that are weak include the one of a kind knife that the boy had used to kill the father, the saying “I’m going to kill you!” and the woman that seen the scene of the killing without her glasses. One piece of evidence that proves the boy’s innocence is the unique knife.…

    • 525 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In both of the trials, the citizens and other members of jury believe that the defendant is guilty based solely on the defendants’ race; however, Atticus and Davis both disagree with the popular opinion and are more than willing to prove and support their own opinion. In 12 Angry Men , Juror 3 loudly proclaims that the boy is guilty and that all ghetto youths are criminals, while Juror 7 wants the jury to reach a decision quickly because he wishes to attend a baseball game that evening. Juror 1 conducts a preliminary ballot and eleven jurors vote for conviction without hesitation. When Davis, or Juror 8, is the only one to disagree and cast the only dissenting vote, Juror 10 gruffly declares that Davis is a weak-willed "bleeding heart". While Juror 2, a shy and stammering bank clerk, appears to be maintaining his guilty verdict because he feels intimidated by the more outspoken jurors, Davis proudly stands his ground refusing to conform to the others’ opinions.…

    • 1092 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    12 Angry Men Jury Duty

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages

    A jury consists of 12 members of the public chosen to determine what they believe is the truth in a trail. The jury system is not an adequate means for the legal system to determine the guilt or innocence of the accused person. The film, “12 Angry Men” exemplifies why a jury system is simply unfair to the jurors and defendant in multiple ways. It shows the jurors’ frustration towards the disturbance of their personal schedules, their level of concern for the case, and how their opinions are biased. Jury duty interrupts the juror’s personal lives by forcing them to be absent from work, school, appointments, and other activities.…

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1 page 27) The wisdom of the 9th juror which has developed over the years through his experiences in life grants him insight which aids not only himself but some of the other jurors’ to come to terms with the innocence of the boy. Thus, the 9th juror’s age plays a major role in his decision-making.…

    • 673 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The myriad of ethical dilemmas presented throughout the film is hidden layer behind the acting, the inner turmoil and strife with each character as they struggle to overcome their personal flaws and beliefs is what truly draws the audience into this masterful production. This paper will draw those turmoil’s to the surface, confronting and analyzing what makes them so tantalizing. “…stories are an excellent way to illustrate how difficult a moral problem can be” (Rosenstand, p.g. 54) 12 Angry Men is an excellent story that teaches several important ethical and moral standpoints all of them very difficult to grasp. The first of these is how to deal with moral differences, the ethics of justice and how dangerous the concept of greatest happiness or Utilitarianism…

    • 1109 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Contradicting his opinion troubles Juror #2 and causes him to respond meekly. He also does not have a lot of power in the room, which contributes to his guilty vote. When the foreman said, “All those voting “guilty” raise your hands,” Juror #2 immediately looks around the room and saw some hands raise and then raises his own hand (11). Because of his unassertive personality, he is vulnerable to the other juror’s opinions. Although he is extremely timid, he starts to gain his voice because he is starting to get tired of being pushed aside by Juror #3 and begins to participate…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    | |Many judges believe jurors usually return the right verdict, very few|Easily influenced by impressive barristers, or the judge.…

    • 2129 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This statement by juror nine gives the viewers an understanding on how good juror eight appealed to the emotions of the others. He did not say that the boy wasn’t guilty; he provided evidence, and showed the others that there are possibilities that the boy did not kill his father. The discussion continues as they bring up the testimony of the witnesses of the murder. Juror eight appeals to the emotions of the jurors once again;…

    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The justice system of America is constantly criticized for being unfair. The establishment of an unfair justice system is due to bias and bigotry. The play Twelve Angry Men by Reginald Rose shows the prejudices of the system as twelve different men, from different past, must concur and make a verdict on a murder case. The author indicates that the justice system is unfair through biases portrayed in the juror’s dialogue, past history, and attitude in making a verdict.…

    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The results are now 10 – 2 because juror #9 wants to hear what juror #8 has to say. After this, the jury goes thru an extended process were juror #8 presents a number of ideas and thoughts to take the evidence out, saying that it is not possible that the old man could have heard the boy’s screaming because the loudness of the train, or the he could not have seen the boy running out at the stairs because he can barely walks. Another vote is call out, and now the numbers are 6 –…

    • 810 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Except for juror number eight, peer pressure impaired their judgment. Based on his maturity level it indicated that the greatest differences are found in juror number eight and three. Once juror (Jack) changed his vote from guilty to not guilty only because the rest of them eventually voted not guilty also. It showed many times that the several jurors changed their minds from not guilty to guilty and vice versa under peer pressure, and overpowering of the strong willed ones.…

    • 1416 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Juror 3 Analysis

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages

    However, he has behaviour role which conflict and frustration taken in action has influence his judgement. Moreover, his stubborn and bad temper has effect his decision and drive his vote of guilty. The juror 3 grow angry and nearly attack juror 8 and this action has weakness his support between the jurors. The intuition or feeling which make decisions with heart and escalation of commitment bias which do not admitted to making a wrong decision.…

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Week 2 Application Assignment: Group Dynamics and Group Stages In 1965, Bruce Tuckman developed one of the most influential models of “the developmental stages in a small group” (Bonebright, 2010, p. 111). It is a four stage model in which each stage needed to be completed in order to reach optimum group functioning. These stages were dubbed “forming”, “storming”, “norming”, “performing”. Later in 1977, he and Mary Ann Conover Jensen added “adjourning” as a fifth stage in his model (Bonebright, 2010).…

    • 1692 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The majority of the jurors did not follow ‘innocent until proven guilty’, rather, they worked the opposite way. This is due to their personal biases. Under Juror 8’s influence, the men began ’talking for an hour’ using ‘reasonable doubt’, thus allowing the men to reach a sensible conclusion. This may have otherwise cost the life of a minor. The film exposes through Juror 8 that the superficial evidence should be dismissed to allow for deeper analysis of the case.…

    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays