Parliamentary procedure

AMIA and whether it includes contractors. Before analyzing the interpretation of the statute itself, it is crucial to consider whether Congress delegated authority to the Occupational Protection Administration (OPA) and if it followed necessary procedure during implementation. After interpreting the relevant material, I will either recommend how…

I appeared under the supervision of the handling attorney, Mr. Joseph C. Yrulegui, at the Mandatory Settlement Conference on April 27, 2017. Mr. Yrulegui and I were in constant communication. I arrived at the Board at approximately 1:30 p.m. and left at approximately 5:00 p.m. The applicant was present and represented by Mr. David Ibarra. Ms. Dora Canales provided the interpreting services. Ms. Annette Castanon appeared representing the interest of the Employment Development Department. This…

Case: - FutureSelect v. Tremont Group Holdings, Inc., 180 Wash.2d 954, 331 P.3d 29. (2014). This case takes place in the Supreme Court of Washington. This is a state court case. It is a civil case, appealed by the defendants, from the court of appeals decision. The Court of Appeals reversed the trial court’s decision. The Supreme Court affirmed the decision of the Court of Appeals. This case was decided in 2014. Issue: Did the Court of Appeals err in determining that plaintiffs may hold Tremont…

therefore, you must not disclose this letter to anyone else. The purpose of this letter is to provide you with an outline of the pertinent arguments that you may use at the Conciliation hearing against American National Property and Company. Procedure Procedures at Conciliation Court vary depending upon the Judge presiding over the proceedings. Regardless, you will check in with the Clerk and you will be instructed to attempt to settle the dispute prior to your case being called. If you are…

To prevail on a traditional summary-judgment motion, a movant must show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that he is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Tex. R. Civ. P. 166a(c); Amedisys, Inc. v. Kingwood Home Health Care, LLC, 437 S.W.3d 507, 511 (Tex. 2014). A defendant is entitled to summary judgment by conclusively negating at least one essential element of the plaintiff’s cause of action or establishing each element of an affirmative defense. Radcliffe v.…

PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS Plaintiff DARLA WILLIAMS moves for an order compelling Defendant SARAH MINER to produce documents withheld on the grounds of privilege under the work-product doctrine. Plaintiffs request that Defendant be ordered to produce said documents by close of business on March 17, 2017. I. ARGUMENT A. THERE’S A SUBSTANTIAL NEED FOR STATEMENTS MADE TO THE DEFENDANT’S INSURANCE ADJUSTERS. Federal Rule 26(b)(3) provides that: “ordinarily, a party may not…

Ndeumeni finally contends that the circuit court erred in denying his claim for breach of contract and unjust enrichment. In his counter-claim, Ndeumeni sought $28,680 in damages resulting from damages incurred when Kemogne ceased contributing to the mortgage on the property and yet continued to live on the property. In the final judgment, the trial judge found that Ndeumeni suffered damages in the amount of $25,000 for the time in which Kemogne occupied the property as a wrongful detainer, as…

SHAWANO, Wis.—A lawsuit filed Monday morning by May, Koch & Brisco Law Firm targets Ford Motor Company (FMC) to seek redress for damages they caused to current and former residents of Shawano, Wisconsin with their negligent waste disposal. The plaintiffs in this lawsuit are 210 current and former residents of Shawano, and all are members of the historic Menominee Indian Tribe, according to attorney Michela May. The plaintiffs seek compensation from defendants FMC and the Shawano County Solid…

In the present action, Ndeumeni’s motion for summary judgment was based on the premise that because the alleged agreement made between Ndeumeni and Kemogne failed to satisfy the statute of frauds, she should be precluded from arguing that there was an agreement under a theory sounding in tort. Initially, we observe that in her original complaint Kemogne did allege that Ndeumeni breached a contract with her. Plainly, a breach of contract claim could not be sustained where it is undisputed that…

Mr. Margolin’s lawsuit would be better addressed if he files it within the proper jurisdiction. Jurisdiction is the power of the court to render a decision about the case in question. In this case we have the potential for three jurisdictions, California, Florida and/or New York. Although, Mr. Margolin filed suit against Novelty Now Inc. in the state of New York, the most appropriate jurisdiction would be in California. We know the business owners live in California and if we assumed that…