Nuremberg Trials

The attached investigative report was compiled by Sergeant Mauricio Medina, Employee #108754, and responds to the complaint of local attorney Ms. Arlene Hecht against Officer Robert G. McCorkle, III, Employee #70317, of the East Patrol Command, Eastside Division for Conduct and Behavior. The allegation is that on December 1, 2016, Officer McCorkle, after finding out that Ms. Hecht had made a plea-bargain deal on behalf of her client while he was in another court, he threatened her by saying…

In the film, 12 Angry Men, there was a lot of information that was given out that affected the jurors’. The story takes place in a courtroom where a murder case was in session. The rest of the movie shows the jurors, deciding whether the defendant of the case was guilty or not guilty. The jurors initially wanted to sentence the boy as guilty after hearing testimony of the boy that killed his own father, but there were three other jurors who thought otherwise. Since the boy was from the slums,…

In the of Adnan Syed who was convicted of murdering his former girlfriend. He should n’t have had the second tray cause they already had enough evidence they need to acquire him. A witness’s testimony won’t change the judge’s mind In the document, it was postponed cause Asia McClain presenting new evidence. Such as “Whether the Court of Special Appeals erred in holding that defense counsel pursuing an alibi strategy without speaking to one specific potential witness of uncertain significance…

Juror number three to me was very irrational with his thought process of convicting the boy of his guiltiness. I felt as though he thought the problems he had with his son were the same that this father and son had. Nonetheless this is not the case. The way he described he and his son’s relationship, made me believe that he was pushing his son into being someone that he wasn’t. The juror not only wanted his son to live in the same mindset as him, but he wanted his son to be him. However, it is…

chapters, I began questioning why Mr. Ewell lied. One reason why I believe he lied was because he does not like African Americans. He, along with many other people in the town, do not think Atticus should be defending Tom. Tom does not deserve a fair trial; he is a black man and Atticus is one of the best lawyers in town. He deserves a bad lawyer. Mr. Ewell’s daughter is the opponent to Tom and Atticus and I would want Atticus to be my lawyer. Mr. Ewell is determined in his ways and he seems to…

I went to Enid, Oklahoma Municipal Court, which was held on September 23rd at 2 p.m. The judge that was over the court room was James Long that featured hearings for adult misdemeanors and traffic court. In addition, I have attended Stillwater’s court and have experienced Mrs. Raun in August. The comparison is to me the attitudes on how handling the people. I have only been in court once because of running a red light and the other times I have went has been for this class and another class…

One day when my mother came home, she found her favorite vase cracked. Regardless of my innocence, I was blamed because of the lack of evidence that proved I did not do it. I then received a punishment for a crime that I did not commit. I am sure you all have similar tales of being blamed for things as a child. Considering this, what if you were accused and convicted of a crime, like murder, but were incapable of proving your innocence? This concept, of being guilty prior to the obtainment of…

There are indictments and accusations that America had been accused of. Some of the general indictments against America are theft of: labor, land, resources, and of the american dream. American has stolen land and has been blamed for stealing peoples hard work and for taking the credit. Resources are taken from the native lands and used for the Americans own needs without permission of the native people. The American Dream was stolen and could not be able to make anything for oneself. An unfair…

Storm clouds above the jurors’ heads The jury rooms discrepancy in personalities in Twelve Angry Men Displays the struggles of having 12 strangers with completely different outlooks on the situation trying to reach a single verdict. In this trial these 12 men have a very unique way on trying to decide the fate of this young murderer, who can either be considered innocent or guilty. Specifically, this play shows the way an upbringing can specify a single character’s judgement upon another…

earlier part of the trial). When you think of the name of the object that was presented previously, then press the space bar." For the Unintentional Naming condition, participants were instructed: "You will be shown a series of images. Following the image will be a fixation cross, and then a dot. When you are presented with the dot, do NOT think of the name of the object that was presented moments ago (that is, the object that was presented during the earlier part of the trial). However, if you…