Defendant

The Defendant 1. The Defendant is the United State Executive branch’s Department of Justice and Office of Legal Counsel- Immigration Enforcement Authorities. That federal powers’ implemented Section 133 of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 (IIRIRA) in adjunction with Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) Section 287 and INA 287(g); to be the superior law for which rules (prior to the Arizona v. United States case in 2012) in its applicability for…

The Plaintiff and the Defendant had been friends for many years before this incident. They are both musicians and both have helped each other out when it came to their careers. When the Plaintiff stated that if someone needed help on a track then he would ask the Defendant to come and join in. The same instance goes for the Defendant; if he needed help with a track or anything he would go to his then friend the Plaintiff. When the Plaintiff asked for help from the Defendant with the whole album,…

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays that the Court enter judgment in her favor and against Defendant, containing the following relief: A. A declaratory judgment that the actions, conduct, and practices of Defendant complained of herein violate the laws of the United States; B. An injunction and order permanently restraining Defendant from engaging in such unlawful conduct C. An order directing Defendant to place Plaintiff in the position he would have occupied but for Defendant's discriminatory and…

insanity is the psychiatric testimony has to try and prove if the defendant understood what they did wrong and they decide if the defendant was sane enough or if they are mentally disable. Defendants should not be able to use insanity as an excuse defense. (Larry J. Siegel, P. 139). Why should an Insanity Defense not be an excuse? Pleading for Insanity should not be used…

identities of the users of Defendants’ services, and amount of money due from Defendants to Amazon, cannot be ascertained without a full accounting of the Defendants’ wrongful and unlawful conduct. Amazon is entitled, therefore, to a full accounting and records of Defendants’ unlawful activities.” The companies were also ordered to cease and desist, including “their officers, agents, representatives, servants, employees, attorneys, successors and assigns, and all others in active concert or…

It starts with the Plaintiff bringing forth legal action against the Defendant. From this point, the Defendant has to respond to the Plaintiffs actions within a certain time period. Once the Defendant does respond, they can admit to it to a portion or none of the lawsuit at that time. Although if the Defendant does not respond within the time period, then the courts will step in and make a judgment on the case. Once the defendant has responded, the lawyers of each party will file a Discovery…

PRELIMINARY STATEMENT The defendant, Western Generator Co. (“WCG”), manufactures and sells a wide range of generators for personal, business, and industrial application. The plaintiff, Richard Albert Imry (“plaintiff #1”), owns and operates an auto body repair shop out of a garage connected to the back of his house. He is joined as plaintiff by his two adult sons, Max Imry (“plaintiff #2”), and Mathias Imry (“plaintiff #3”), who live with Plaintiff #1 and work at the auto body repair shop.…

The Hospital has fully and completely responded to the Third-Party Defendants’ discovery requests, and in our good faith effort to clarify and address the specific items in your letter, and thereby avoid any discovery dispute, we are providing the following supplemental responses and will further supplement if additional responsive information is obtained as discovery progresses. In further response and without waiving any of the previous objections, including objections as to attorney-client…

27. The Plaintiff 's actions are detrimental to the Defendant 's daughter due to the fact that the Plaintiff is teaching her daughter like she has taught her son that the laws of the government can be ignored along with valid Court orders. 28. Both the Defendant’s children’s records demonstrate the detrimental harm that the Plaintiff has continuously brought to the Defendant’s children in her efforts to alienate them from their father. Additionally, as noted, the Defendant’s son who has not had…

Trial court enjoined defendant from continuing her business after 90 days. Defendant appealed. FACTS: For some years, at 13949 Dacosta street, in the city of Detroit, the Defendant had a business of raising, breeding and boarding St. Bernard dogs. Her business is adjacent to the Plaintiff's neighbor, Defendant's business would give off obnoxious odors and constant barking. The court found that Defendant’s business represented a nuisance to Plaintiffs, and that Defendant had not acquired the…