• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/72

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

72 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

Strict Per Stirps

shares for each line of descendants are always divided at first generational level, and then one share for each family line

modern per stirpes

UPC- Per capita with representation, per capita at the first level, then by representation


-divide shares at first generational line with living takers and then one share for each family line

Not survived by descendants or spouse

all to surviving parents, then descendants of parents, half to ma/paternal grandparents/descendants


laughing heirs- no inheritence by kin further than descendants of GP's

intestate share of adopted child

child takes from and through adoptive parents, severs ties with genetic, except when child is adopted by spouse of genetic parent.

intestate share of non-marital children

from and through mother


from father if paternity suit, father acknowledged paternity or probate proceedings

lifetime gifts to an heir or beneficiary


(COMMON LAW)

presumptively an advancement of intestate share, to be taken into account while distributing estate

lifetime gifts to an heir or beneficiary


(UPC & MAJORITY)

gift is not an advancement unless declared as such in contemporaneous writing by donor, or acknowledged as such in writing by donee



disclaimer

must be in writing, signed and notarized


must be filed within 9mo of test death


disclaimer can be partial


cannot disclaim after accepting an interest or benefits


disclaimer cannot attempt to control who takes

simultaneous death

when title to property depends on order of deaths and no sufficient evidence who died first, property passes as though beneficiary survived



UPC simultaneous death



unless beneficiary survives test by 5 days, considered predeceased

Requirements of will

1. signed by testator (or at direction


2. signature in presence (acknowledge sig) to witnesses


3. two attesting wits who saw t sign will or t ack it was her will


4. wits must sign in reasonable time after



interested witness rule 2-505

UPC: signing of a will by interested witness does not invalidate will or any provision

Attestation clause

prima facie evidence of the facts recited and is important with witnesses

line of sight test




conscious present test

LOS: testator could see witness sign if looked, uninterrupted line of vision




CP: witness is present if the test, through sight, sound or other senses, is cognizant that wit is in act of signing

Attorney liability

minority: cannot sue b/c no contract




Majority: privity is rejected, attorney has duty to inteded beneficiaries

Holographic will

UPC recognizes


handwritten and signed by testator, no wits



Conditional will

should probate be denied because condition was not met?




or did alleged condition merely reflect the motive or inducement for making the will




If T still has will after condition not occured, evidence that he intended it to remain valid

valid revocation

subsequent test instrument, executed properly


OR


physical act


decisive act(crossing out signature)


must be on executed will itself, not copy


proxy, must be test direction and in test presence



harmless error doctrine UPC 503

court may excuse noncompli if there is clear and convincing evidence that decent intended doc to be will

substantial compliance doctrine

court may deem defectively executed will as good, if defect execution nonetheless fills the purpose of formalities.

self proving affidavit UPC 2-504

lost will

1. proof of due execution (testimony of wits)


2. cause of wills non production


3. contents must be substantially proved by copy or testimony by wits who have read the will

Presumptive revocation

only if last with testator


1. if will last will test, and not found after death, presumed test revoked by physical act


2. if will last with test, found mutilated, presumption is test did mutilating.


(evidence allow to rebut resumptive rev)

two wills that do not reference each other

1. read together to extent possible


2. second will is treated as codicil(replaces inconsistencies)


3.BUT if second will wholly inconsistent, first will is revoked by implication

Dependent relative revocation

premits revocation to be disregarded when act of revo was premised, conditioned, or dependent upon, mistake of law or fact as to the validity of another disposition


Only applied if disregarding revo would bring closer to test attempted to do but failed versus intestacy

will beneficiary predeceases testator

predec bene must have been w/in scope of antilapse AND have descendants that survived testator. Legacy passes to predec bene


if bequest lapses, gift falls into residuary estate


"If he survives me clause" antilap does not apply, follows terms

lapse in residuary estate

if residuary estate is devised to 2+ persons, and gift to one fails for any reason other resid devisees take entire residual in proportion to their interest


antilapse statutes overrides surviving benefic rule

Class gifts



if gift to class of persons, if a member of class predec test, the class members who surivive the test take as opposed to individual gifts which carry over to residuary





Rule of convenience

class closing rule, later born class members do not share in the gift



marriage after will executed

omitted spouse takes intestate share (only as to that portion of the estate that was not devised to test's children or descendants from earlier marriage)


UNLESS S appears omission was intentional OR provision was made for spouse outside the will and is shown that transfers were

child after will

pretermitted child takes intestate share


UPC- if T had other children when will was exec with prop to them, pretermitted child share is limited to gifts to other children UNLESS it appears from will (no ex ev) that omission was intention


repub by codicil- new will on date of codicil, pretermitted child loses status

abatement to pay creditors

demonstrative legacies are treated the same as bequest to extent of the value of the specified property, and as a general legacy to the extent of any excess

Ademption Doctrine

if will makes specific gift of property, and prop is not owned by test at death, gift fails under ademption. Ademption does not apply to demonstrative legacies (general amount from specific source), ademption only applies to specific legacies

Exceptions to Ademption


Specific devisee takes any remaining specifically devised property...

1 any unpaid balance of the PP by the sale of the property


2 any amount of condemnation aware for taking of the property


3 any amount of fire/casualty insurance for damaged or destroyed property at death



Ademption and will executed before T declared incapacitated

if prop specifically devised and sold by guarding or conservator, specific devisee has general legacy equal to the net sale price or insurance proceeds. (otherwise guarding could change will by selling certain assets, nor did T have capaciy to change will to adjust for loss or destruction

specific bequest of encumbered property

specific devisee takes exactly what T owned (title subject to mortgage) unless will specifically directs for lien to be exonerated from the residuary

Incorporation by reference

writing must exist at time of will


will must show intent to incorporate


will must describe the writing sufficient to permit its identity


UPC will may refer to written state or list (tangible personal property other than money, property used in trade/business) not specifically disposed of AND be signed AND be written before or after

acts of significance doctrine


upc 2-512

lifetime act with a lifetime motive or purpose will not affect the will




same result for "contents of cabinet" execpt that those contents will not be deemed to include title documents; deeds, stock certs, bank passbooks

plain meaning rule


2-805

absent suspicious circ, presumed testator read the will and intended contents, any ex ev would change the meaning of words in will

contracting wills


UPC 2-215

can only be established by provision stating that contract does exista AND stating the material provisions of the contract OR a binding and enforceable written agreement

disinheritence


2-101b

authorizes the decedent, by will, to exclude or limit the right of an individual or class to share in the decedent’s intestate estate, in effect disinheriting that individual or class

non testamentary assets

property by survivorship (joint bank account)


passing by contract (life insurance, employee retirement benefits)


prop held in trust, including revocable trust where terms govern dis of assets


proper which decedent held power of appointment

capacity for will


1 be capable of knowing and understanding the nature of act


2 know the natural objects of bounty


3 disposition that they are making of that property


4 be capable of relating these items to one another and forming and orderly desire regarding the disposition of the property

insane delusion


3-407

must be shown that delusion materially affected disposition of the will AND test would not have disposed of property as he did, BUT FOR that delusion

undue influence


3-407

exerted influence over testator that over come donor's free will


confidential + suspicious relationship=presumption of UI


Confidential only is not enough, but if confidential and only if person is receiving something, creates presumption

fraud in inducement

misrep causes test to execute/revoke will in wrongdoer's favor

fraud in execution

test is tricked into signing. wrongdoer intention misrep the content or character of instrument which does not carry out test's intent

trust

an arrangement where a trustee manages specific property as a fiduciary for one or more persons

settlor

person who creates the trust by will or inter vivos transfer

trustee

holds legal title to the res, usually can sell the property and replace with more desirable

beneficiaries of trust

holds equitable title in the trust


persons who benefit trust is created


entitled to payments from trust income


SAME party can be all, just need another trustee or beneficiary,

classifications of trusts

duties imposed on trustee (active or passive)


purpose of trust (private or charity)


manner of creation (express, resulting or constructive)


time of creation (inter vivos or testamentary)

Trust Intent


upc 402

intent to create a trust exists whenever one party transfers property to anther with intent to vest beneficial interest in a 3rd party

Trust Res

trust not created till funded (res)


property must be transferred to trust/trustee

Trustee & 1+ benefits

for valid trust, must be ascertainable benficiriaries


When settlor intends to create a trust, equitable title transfer to beneficiares instantly


except for unborn children and charitble trusts

Powers of appointment


2-608

if class of bene's is described such that some person might reasonably be said to fit description, power of appointment is valid, otherwise invalid




holder of the power of appointment owe no fid duty to appointees

Noncharitable purposes of Trust

honorary trust- transferee is not obligated to carry out settlor's purpose, if does not, reverts back to settlor or estate



mandatory trusts

trustee must distrib income to the beneficiary



discretionary trusts

beneficiary has no right to receive payments of income or principal

support trusts

requires trustee to pay as much income as required for bene's support

sprinkle trust

trustee is authorized to accumlate income and add it to principal

spray trust

trustee must distribute all income currently, but has discretion to determine which bene's get it and the amount

Trustee's duty of loyalty


§ 802 UTC

everying must be done in beneficiary's best interest


Self dealing= irrebuttable presumption of breach of loyalty. transaction is voidable by bene's


only defense is judicial approval, autho by settlor or consent by ALL bene's

Duty of Prudence


UTC 804

1 standard of prudence is applied to any investment as part of the total portfolio, rather than to single investments


2 Trustee can invest in anything that plays an appropriate role in achieving the risk/return obj of the trust and meets other prudent investing requirements

Duty to Inform


utc 813

must keep beneficiary reasonably informed about admin and material facts necessary for them to protect their interests

Duty to Account


utc 813

trustee has a duty to provide to the beneficiary complete info re the trust including review of trust related documents upon the beneficiary’s reasonable request for such information.




trustee must, prior to a non-routine transaction, inform the beneficiaries of any material facts affecting the beneficiaries’ interests.



Modifying and Terminating Trusts


UTC 412

court may modify trust if:


1 because of circumstances not anticipated by settlor


2 modification or deviation will further the purpose of the trust

Trust Protectors


UTC 808(c)

given power to amend or terminate the trust, with the approval of the 3rd party

General Powers of Trustee


UTC 815

trustee has the same powers in dealing with trust property as would an outright owner

Trustee Breaches

A trustee who engages in self-dealing breaches his fiduciary duty regardless of whether he was acting in good faith and the trust suffered no injury as a result.

Remedies for breach of fid duties as trustee

bene is entitled to compensatory damages to restore trust to prior to breach, in addition, entitled to disgorge the trustee of any profit he/she made


OR


can enforce a constructive trust or equitable lien on property, treating it as part of the trust.

no further inquiry rule

if trustee involved in self dealing or COI, no further inquiry made


Only defenses are that settlor authorized action, beneficiary consented after full disclosure OR trustee obtained judicial approval in advance


even so, bene is entitled to judicial review