Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
20 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
Naive expectations of the sun are:
|
1. If it has no source of internal energy generation, it will loose heat
2.if has internal engine supplying fresh energy, able to maintain itself, eventually run out of fuel |
|
Why are the naive expectations wrong?
|
GRAVITY CHANGES EVERYTHING, the sun cannot cool down
|
|
What happens when the sun losses radiant energy (heat or light)?
|
SUN GETS EVEN HOTTER AS IT'S FUEL SUPLY DIMINISHES (inner parts)
|
|
How does the sun get even hotter then the fuel supply diminishes?
|
shrinking a little, converting gravitational potential energy to heart
|
|
What is the internal engine for the sun and other planets?
|
NUCLEAR REACTIONS
|
|
Why can't the sun cool down?
|
1.if too lose internal heat energy, particles rushing less rapidly and provide less sustaining pressure to support weight
2. the act of contraction of the sun would lead to conversion of gravitational potential energy into heat 3.some converted energy gets radiated away, the rest stays in sun and raises temperature |
|
How is the outward-flowing energy constantly replenished?
|
INTERNAL SOURCE, permits the sun to maintain equilibrium
|
|
Kelvin contraction
|
source of outflowing energy while the sun was actually forming
|
|
How did the sun start?
|
low-density cloud of gas widely distributed in space
|
|
What happened to low-density cloud of gas?
|
condensed, under effects of gravity, to form denser lump, got hotter by releasing gravitational potential energy
|
|
Why didn't the sun not collapse down to a very dense, much smaller body?
|
LUMP eventually got so dense that it become opaque: the heat energy within it could not easily be radiated away to empty space since each emitted photon had a good chance of running into another atom
|
|
What brought the lump to a haut?
|
PRESSURE from random rapid motions of atoms whizzing around
|
|
What was an argument against Kelvin contractions?
|
Theory of natural selection proposed by Charles Darwin
|
|
What did theory natural selection suggest about the age of the earth?
|
the earth has to be much older than ten million years, observed diversity of species
|
|
How else can we prove that there are hardly any changes in the size of the sun?
|
elipses, since in the past they did not see total eclipses, then sun has not shrunk very significantly in size over the last few thousand years at least
|
|
How was the sun made hot? (important)
|
the sun's contractions under self-gravity and the consequent release of gravitational potential energy, THIS WOULD HAVE BEEN THE CASE IF THERE WERE NO NUCLEAR REACTIONS AT ALL
|
|
What allowed the nuclear reactions to occur within the sun?
|
extreme heat
|
|
What maintains the sun's heat?
|
NUCLEAR REACTIONS, but didn't originally produce it
|
|
What would happen if there was no nuclear reactions within the planets?
|
the universe will still be full of hot star-sized lumps with contractions just as Kelvin hypothesized BUT WILL NOT BE VERY LONG-LIVED
|
|
What are the factors that do not explain sun's longevity?
|
1. gravitational contractions
2. chemical reactions |