• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/33

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

33 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
Vilain's central research question
is homosexuality determined by biological or environmental factors?
most subjective part of research
what actually to study
what's worth empirical research
human model- pros
directly relevant to question, highly significant
human model- cons
pheno difficult to define
limited access to relevant tissue

(ex- brain)...molecular mechanism can't be examined

ethical concerns
animal model- pros
phenotype easier to measure, relevant tissue accessible

*can do experiments, see molecular mechanisms
animal model- cons
may not be directly relevant to humans
issues with recruitment of subjects
-selection bias (representative sample?)

-phenotypic definition (how to define homo.)

-biological material (which tissue, what time of development)
different types of experimental design (3)
1. linkage studies

2. association studies

3. expression studies
defining sexual orientation in humans vs. animals
humans -identity
sexual attraction
behavior

animals- easier to measure behavior
linkage analysis
analysis of family genomes- co segregation

-search for genetic region passed on to affected members more than non-affected
-need more than 1 affected person

*VERY EFFICIENT
problem with linkage analysis
sexual orientation as a trait is waay more complicated, ill-defined, not caused by one gene
association studies
random ppl in population, look @ genetic markers shared amongst ppl with common trait

*need large group of ppl w/ trait, group of demographically closely matched controls

**start with candidate genes
problem with association studies
need 1,000s of ppl, hella $$$
expression studies
look at certain tissue, see if particular gene is turned on/off

**start with candidate genes
(tell you which genes matter)
epigenetics
genes in combination with specific environment
genetic imprinting
imprinted genes expressed from only 1 chromosome depending on if maternally or paternally inherited
paternal alleles can...
stimulate embryonic growth
maternal alleles can...
inhibit embryonic growth
gene expressed if...
next to unmethylated cytosine
gene not expressed if...
next to methylated cytosine
DNA METHYLATION
regulates gene expression
problem with epidemiological measures of environment
difficult to estimate objectively the duration, intensity of environmental influences
twin studies
-have entirely same genome, not all the same traits (can determine effects of environment)

*diff epigenetic expression

*concordance rate should be higher in mono than dizygotic twins
co-segregation (linkage analysis)
genetic marker tends to go along with certain trait
xq28
4/5 times they found a link to male homosexuality

(x-chrom, passed down from mother)
linkage and association study
what genes people have
gene expression study
what genes ppl are actually expressing
gene expression and gay rams
no differences in gene expression btwn gay and straight rams

-maybe has nothing to do with genes
-maybe should look at gene expression during development, not adulthood
-what regions of brain to study
10q26 allele
from father- no more gay than predicted by chance alone

from mother- more often gay than predicted by chance alone
not whether or not you get the gene, but...
who you get it from determines whether the gene gets turned on or off (epigenetics)
mouse pups being licked by mom
changes how genes expressed later in life- changes in gene expression can be passed on to offspring
concordance rate in monozygotic twins
52%
(not all explained by genetics)
new Vilain twin study
discordant twins (separated strait from gay)

*only differed by 4%