Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
48 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
Who may contest validity of will?
|
Person who can show has (or will) suffer harm.
|
|
In terrorem clause
|
No contest clause
In CO unenforceable if interested party has probable cause |
|
Testator issues
|
Age
Mental Capacity Insane Delusions No undue influence No fraud |
|
Age
|
CO and UPC - 18 y.o.
|
|
Testamentary Capacity
|
T must know/understand:
nature of act extent of property proposed disposition natural object sof bounty will represents wishes "Cunningham test" |
|
Insane Delusion
|
A persistent belief resulting from illness or disorder in the existence or non-existence of something which is contrary to all evidence
Invalidates entire will |
|
Typical will format
|
Statement declaring will
statement of relations gifts residue nomination of pr signature of witnesses (if not holographic) |
|
Undue influence
|
Usually proved through circumstantial evidence
CL definition: - T susceptible to UI or domination - opportunity to exercise UI - disposition to influence - provisions unnatural - influence resulted in control of T's mind |
|
Fraud CL elements
|
- material or misleading
- known to be false made with intent of deceiving - caused the T to act in reliance - resulting in damages |
|
Types of testamentary fraud
|
- fraud in execution
- fraud in inducement |
|
Will conflicts of interest
|
- joint representation
- |
|
Witness requirements
|
- signed by at least wo
- prior to or after T's death - within a reasonable time - witness either t's signing or acknowledgement of signature |
|
CL - who can be witness
|
Competent + disinterested
|
|
CO - who can be a witness
|
competent, need no be disinterested
|
|
CL exceptions for T observing Ws
|
- line of sight test
- presence test - conscious presence test |
|
Substantial compliance
|
only arises if document is signed or ack. by decedent as his will or if established by C&C evidence that decedent erroneously signed will of spouse.
|
|
CO - types of self-proving affidavits
|
simultaneous execution form
post-execution form - any time after execution |
|
Self proving affidavit
|
creates presumption of valid execution
|
|
Enforcement of holographic wills
|
Not universal, but ok under UPC and in CO
|
|
Holographic requirements
|
in writing
signed by T material portions in T's handwriting T intent valid whether or not witnessed |
|
Document integration
|
Internal
External |
|
Document issues
|
- republishing
- incorporation by reference - acts of independent significance - memo of disposition |
|
Republishing
|
Can cure testator issue but NOT procedural execution issues
|
|
Incorporation by reference
|
- intent to incorporate the document
- will describes a separate document - document must exist when will executed - underlying will must be valid |
|
Act of independent significance
|
- act of non-testamentary signficance
- it's t's act had a testamentary motive then not independent & violates SOWills |
|
Memo of disposition
|
- signed by T or in T's handwriting
- describes items and devisees w/ reasonable certainty - may or may not exist at tiem of writing - can be altered after its preparation - may be a writing that has absolutely no significance apart from its effect on dispositions - must refer to this power - only tangible personal property, not cash |
|
Types of ambiguities
|
Latent - not obvious on face
Patent - obvious on face Ask: would a proofreader notice the problem? |
|
Extrinsic evidence admissible:
|
- to show an ambiguity exists
- to clarify it |
|
Mistake
|
A mistake can be altered if it is harmless error and not altering the T's true intent.
|
|
Traditional view - mistake
|
No remedy for correcting a mistake
|
|
Ways to revoke a will
|
- T's intentional act
- by proxy - by another testamentary document |
|
Intentional act
|
burn, tear, cancel, obliterate or destroy with intent to revoke.
|
|
By operation of law
|
most common:
- divorce - felonious killing |
|
CO revival possibilities
|
- no potential revival
- potential revival - first will remains revoked unless revived by third will Previous will can also be revived if it is evident from circumstances or T's declarations. |
|
Testate gift classifications
|
- specific
- general - demonstrative - residuary |
|
General gift
|
- certain dollar amount
- quantity payable from general assets - no requirement gift be paid from designated source - T's intent is to give more of a monetary benefit |
|
Demonstrative
|
- specific amount or quantity paid from a specific source
|
|
Testate property issues
|
- ademption by satisfaction
- ademption by extinction - abatement - exoneration |
|
Inter-vivos gift treated as whole or partial satisfaction of testamentary gift only if
|
- will provides a deduction for the gift
- T declared in a contemporaneous writing that ademption intended - devisee acknowledged in a writing that ademption was intended |
|
CO ademption by extinction
|
Go through each option and STOP when you reach the applicable scenario under CRS 15-11-606
|
|
Order in which gifts abate
|
- property not disposed of by will
- residuary devises - general devises - specific devises |
|
Alternate gift and anti-lapse
|
Valid alternate gift trumps anti-lapse
|
|
Class gifts function traditional/modern
|
Traditional: only surviving class members take, anti-lapse not applied
Modern: try to apply anti-lapse to share of each pre-deceased. If not possible, default to traditional rule. |
|
Common law closing rules
|
Natural closing
Rule of Convenience |
|
Blood v. affinity
|
No step-child provisions in CO anti-lapse
Watch out for "uncle," "aunt," do not include affinity here. Half-bloods = whole bloods |
|
Relationship test
|
Is the pre-deceased devisee the T's
- grandparent or - a lineal discendant of the T's grandparent |
|
Will Contract
|
Contracts not to revoke, amend, etc.
|
|
Will K's under UPC
|
only established by will provision, express reference in a will, or a writing signed by decedent evidencing the K
|