• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/48

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

48 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

Seven Intentional Torts

1. Assault
2. Battery
3. False Imprisonment
4. Tresspass to land
5. Tresspass to chattel
6. Intentional Infliction of emo distress
7. conversion
Opening statement for each tort
"To establish a prima facia case for .."
Assault
(i) P in reasonable apprehension
(ii) of Harmful or offensive contact
(iii) Intent
(iv) Causation

(words + conduct)
Battery
(i) harmful or offensive contact
(ii) w/ P's person - including things attached to P
(iii) intent
(iv) causation

(judged by reasonable person standard)
False Imprisonment
(i) act or omission
(ii) confining P to bounded area
(iii) intent
(iv) causation

ex: Sufficeint forms of restraint : physical force, threats of force, failure to release, invalid use of legal authority
Tresspass
(i) physical invasion
(ii) to P's prop
(iii) intent
(iv) causation
Tresspass to chattle
(i) act of invasion
(ii) interferring w/ P's tangible personal Prop
(iii) Intent
(iv) Causation
(v) damages
IIED
(i) extreme & outrageous conduct
(ii) Intent to cause severe emo disstress
(iii) Causation
(iv) damages - Severe emo distress

Special P's: Pregnant, children, elderly

Special D's: Inn Keepers, and common carriers
Conversion (alot of damage)
(i) act of interferring with P's right of possession
(ii) Serious enough to pay full market value
(iii) intent
(iv) causation

Remdies: FMV or Replevin (return property)
Defenses to intentional torts
Consent - Express/Implied
self defense
Defense of others
Defense of property

**Necessity** (for tresspass to land)
(a) public - protecting a
community
(b) private - protecting interest
of self or one person
Defamation
(i) defamatory statement
(ii) of and concerning P
(iii) publication to 3rd party
(iv) damage to rep (loathsome diesease = defamation per se)
Defamation types of publication
Libel - written
Slander - Spoken
Defamation to public figure: 1st amendment protects speech on matters of public concern in such cases need 2 addt'l elements
For matters of public concern

(1) Falsity
(2) Fault (malice)
Defenses to Defamation
* Consent
* Truth
* Privildge (absolute spousal/judicial proceeding)
Privacy Torts (5)
1. Appropriation
2. Intrusion
3. False light
4. Disclosure
5. Misrepresentation
Appropriation
D uses P's name or images for a commercial purpose
Intrusion
* invasion of P's seclusion

* In a way objectionable to avg person

* in a place where P had a reasonable expectation of privacy
False Light
* D makes widespread dissementation

* of major falsehood

* objectionable to average person

* with malice
Disclosure
* wide spread dissemination
* about confidential information
misrepresentation
* affirmative misrepresentation

* intent to reduce reliance

* scienter : knew statement was false (deciet + knowledge)

* causation
Negligence
P was owed a duty whereby the duty was breached by D, actually and proximatley causing the damages.
Duty
A duty is owed to forseeable plaintiffs to prevent forseeable risks of harm from causing injury
two dissucssions for Duty
Under Cardozo - a D owes a duty to all forseeable plaintiffs within the zone of danger

Under Andrews: A D owes a duty to all forseeable P's
Forseeable plaintiff's always
-----always a duty for....
(1) if D caused the peril
(2) relationship
(3) statutory - (negligence per se)
(4) contractual
After discussion you will discuss
(STANDARD OF CARE OWED)
Duty...

* Standard of Care:
1. General - Reasonable purdent Person
2. professionals - knowledge and skilll of other memeber of the profession
3. Children - same age, intelligence, experience
4. Common carriers/ Inn keepers - high degree
(STANDARD OF CARE LAND OWNERS)
Undiscovered Tresspassor:
* No duty

discovered tresspassor:
* duty to warn of hazards (known of)
* including artificial condition

Licensee: permission on land for own purpose/buisness ;
* duty to warn of dangerous conditions natural
* artificial
* reasonable care (no duty to inspect)

Invitee: (place open to public); * duty to warn of all hazards
* natural and artificial
* duty to inspect.
Attractive nuisance doctrine - STANDARD OF CARE
forseeable risks to children

(i) dangerous condition landowner should be aware of
(ii) owner knows or should of known children frequent
(iii) condition likley to cause injury
(iv) expense of remedy slight compared to magnitude of risk
BREACH
Occurs when standard of care falls below applicable standard

(discuss facts here)
CAUSE
Acutal - "but for"

Proximate - "if harm suffered by P was forseeable at time act occurred
DAMAGES
Common damages :

* Medical damages
* Past/future income
* pain and suffering
* Compensatory _ Putting p where they were had the damage not occured
DEFENSE TO NEGLIGENCE
NV: "Pure Comparitive Negligence"

where P's recovery is lowered but P will still recover. Award reduced by percentage of fault attributable to her

Fault: amount of risk assumed (express/implied)
Strict Liability : Prima Facia
(1) absolute duty to make safe
(2) breach
(3) actual/proximate cause
(4) damage
STRICT LIABiLITY for (3)
1. Ultra hazardous Activity
2. Wild Animals
3. Products
Ultra Hazardous Activity
(i) involves serious risk of harm
(ii) cannot be performed w/out risk
(iii) activity not common in community
** duty, breach, damages**
Wild animals
(I) owner strictly liable for his animals in tresspass

(II) strictly liable to licensee's and Invitee's so long as the person didn't do anything to bring about the injury

***NO STRICT LIABILITY for domestic animals unless owner knows of the animals dangerous propensities.
PRODUCTS LIABILITY
1. consider - negligence/ res-ipsa
***************************
(i) DUTY OWED BY COMMERCIAL SUPPLIER

(ii) BREACH
- so defective (design/manufatur) its unreasonable dangerous
- product dangerous beyond expectation
- less dangerous alternative

(III) CAUSE (actual defect exsisted when it left hands/proximate p made forseeable use)
(IV) DAMAGES
products liabilities always consider
1. breach of implied warranty of fitness - for ordinary purposes of use

2. breach of warranty of fitness for particular purpose (when seller has reason to know of the particular purpose buyer is buying and buyer relies on sellers judgement)
NIED - NV "by stander recovery"
(i) presence at scene
(ii) close familial relationship
(iii) witness victim injured
(iv) severe emo distress + physical symptoms
Negligence Per Se
When a statutory duty is owed:

(class of person protected under statute)

(class of harm protected against by statute)
Wrongful death Actions occur:
when but for D's conduct P would not have died

Damages:
* Loss of consortium
* loss of support
* loss of services
Nevada' survival statue, provides that (spouse) may ...
sue on behalf of plaintiff's estate for:

1. personal injuries
2. medical expenses
3. pain and suffering

but no action for loss of parent child relationship
random torts to consider
1. Nuisance
2. Interference with business relations
3. Wrongful institution of legal proceedings
4. Res ipsa loquitor
Nuisance
P's inablility to enjoy the use of his land b/c it has been interfered with to a substantial degree
Interference w/ Buisness relations
(i) existance of a valid K
(ii) D had knowledge of the K
(iii) intentional interference (act)
(iv) damage
Wrongful institution of legal proceedings
1. Malicious prosecution - where criminal or civil proceeding brought fourth for improper purpose

2. Abuse of proceedings - where using legal process for improper purpose
Res Ipsa Loquitor
arises when you can't prove a breach of a duty, P can still get to a jury by showing that nothing else could've been the cause other than you.
police officer and firefighter exception
member of certain professions can not recover for injuries that are inherent in the risk of their jobs.
viacarious liability
ER are viacariously liable for torts of EE

Cosideration
1. scope of employment
2. frolic/detor
3. was ee's action to benefit the er.

defenses: independent contractor