• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/27

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

27 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
Affirmative Defense
Defense by excuse. Basically, admitting you did something, but that you were justified.
Privilege of Consent
Apparent Consent Ex: Lifting arm to take a flu shot

Implied Consent Ex: Agreeing to play football implies you consent to the associated violence
Privilege of Defense of Others
Anyone may assert

Reasonable Force

Court split on Mistake, either Does not Destroy if Reasonable, OR, trier of facts must "Stand in Shoes" and determine reasonableness
Privilege of Self-Defense
Anyone may assert

Reasonable force is proportional, Deadly force sometimes requires inability to retreat in some jdx

Reasonable mistake does not destroy privilege
Privilege of Defense of Property
Possessor may assert

Non-deadly force, no force if peaceful invasion

Mistake destroys privilege
Privilege of Recapture of Chattels
Possessor, only under fresh pursuit

Non-deadly force

Mistake destroys privilege
Battery
Volitional Act

Purpose to cause harmful/offensive contact
OR
Knowledge of likeliness of H/O contact

Result of harmful/offensive contact
Assault
Volitional Act

Intent to Cause apprehension of imminent h/o contact
OR
substantial certainty that apprehension will result

Result is that apprehension
False Imprisonment
Confinement

Intent to confine without consent or authority

Result of confinement or injury
Confinement requires fixed boundaries, no safe escape, and fear of injury
Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress
Extreme and Outrageous Conduct

Intent to cause SEVERE emotional distress
OR
Recklessness

Result of Severe Emotional Distress
Trespass to Land
Intent to be present on land

Presence on, under, or above land
Trespass to Chattels
Intent to Affect Chattel (using or dispossessing)

Result of Damage
-Dispossession
-Deprivation
-Bodily Harm
Conversion or Forced Sale
Intent - Exercise Dominion or Control

Result - Complete or very substantial interference
Shopkeeper's Privilege
Shopkeeper may assert

Detention on reasonable grounds with reasonable investigation

Mistake does not destroy
Privilege of Public Necessity
Anyone may assert

Actually or apparently necessary to avoid greater harm to the community or many persons

Mistake does not destroy
Private necessity
Anyone may assert

Actually or apparently necessary to avoid greater harm to one or a few persons

Actor is liable for actual losses
Negligence
Duty of care
Breach of duty
Causation
Damages
Negligence: Duty of Care
Legal obligation imposing reasonable standard of care
Negligence: Breach of Duty
Breaking an imposed duty of care
Negligence: Causation
Ask whether the injury would have occurred without the accused party's breach of the duty owed to the injured party
Negligence: Damages
Placing a monetary value on the harm done
Learned Hand Balancing Test
Negligent IF

Burden < Probability x Loss

Ex: $100 to lock door. 20% chance of someone going in door and getting injuries totaling $3,000.

$100 < 0.2 x $3,000 = $600

So, negligence
Professional Standard of Care
Objective standard as defined by skills/knowledge.

Skills/knowledge determined by experts and enforced by professional community
Informed Consent
Physician Standard: current practices

Patient standard: material to decision

Causation - A reasonable patient would have rejected

Actual damages
Res Ipsa Loquitur
Complete Control of Instrumentality
+
Event doesn't ordinarily occur without negligence
=
RIL Effect:
1. Permissible Inference:
Leave it to Jury
2. Rebuttable Presumption:
Df burden to prove non-negligence to win
3. Shifts burden of prove:
Df burden to prove non-negligence with preponderance of evidence to win
Negligence per se
1. Df violated a safety statute
2. Caused harm statute was meant to avoid
3. Pl was within zone of risk

Shortcut for establishing a standard of care.
Transferred Intent
Any of the following can be caused by failing to intentionally cause any of the following:

Battery
Assault
False Imprisonment
Trespass to Land
Trespass to Chattels