Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
18 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
Social Presence
|
-a sense of connectedness with others that can happen with the assistance of communication technologies. |
|
How are GC and LD relationshipssimilar and different?
|
-members in both situations mustdepend on one another to achieverelational and task goals
-members rely on differentmodes of interaction to accomplishgoals |
|
Long-Distance Relationships
|
Committed relationships in whichthe unit members perceive theyare unable to interact FtF forprolonged periods of time on aregular and/or frequent basis toaccomplish their goals
|
|
How are Long-Distance Romantic Relationshipsand Distributed Teams Alike?
|
1. Geographic and/or temporal separation
2. Heavy reliance on technology-mediated communication |
|
Spatial/geographicSeparation
|
-Co-located or distant
-Minimum number of miles -Be outside the state -Socially constructed |
|
Temporal/Time Separation
|
-Unable to spend time together FtF on most days
-More trust and certainty with more vs. less FtF contact -Differences in time zones -Expectations for the continuance of the relationship |
|
Temporal/Time Separation – Romantic Context
|
Surveyed 186 students in LD datingrelationships
• Those who were uncertain about everliving in the same city as their partners(vs. those who felt more certainabout reunion) were significantly • more distressed • less satisfied • rated communication coping strategiesas less helpful |
|
Best ways to cope with LDdating relationships
|
-Perceived helpfulness of joint problemsolving was a major predictor ofsatisfaction among participants in lowdistress LDDRs
-Perceived helpfulness of opennesswas a major predictor of satisfactionamong the participants in highdistress LDDRs |
|
Temporal/Time Separation – OrganizationalContext
|
Team members who feel certainabout collocating with theirmembers in the future tend to bemore satisfied and less distressedthan those who felt uncertainabout about collocating with theirmembers in the future
|
|
Relationship |
can be defined into interaction and perception.
|
|
1. Interaction
|
• Having a high degree of FtF interaction, intimacy, and companionship • If we’re not together, then we’re not in a relationship |
|
2. Perception
|
•We continue relationships in our mind
• Relationships don’t end when FtF eventsend • Relationships continue when we engagein maintenance strategies usingtechnology-mediated communication(TMC) |
|
Cons to social presence?
|
• Independence is often a goodthing
• Allows people to focus on owngoals • May have difficulty detachingand coping with separation • May be considered pathological(obsessive, addicted) • Makes people vulnerable todeception, mindless processing,groupthink |
|
Social Presence and theMaintenance of DRs – OrganizationalContext
|
Advantages
-Less distractions Challenges -Drag on coordination in teams -Drag on distributed teams -Collaboration -Invention |
|
Challenges of Distributed Teams
|
-Less control overworkers from adistance
-Hard to keep work/homeboundaries • E.g., kids or friends mayinterrupt you b/c theyassume you’re free b/cyou’re not in the office. -Workers feel isolated -Security issues -Less collaboration |
|
Advantages of Distributed Teams
|
Reduced expenses
-Access to global markets, talentpool -Environmental benefits -Greenhouse gas reduction -Increased productivity • 35-40% more productive -Enhanced profits -Worker satisfaction, commitment |
|
Cues filtered-out
|
address the lack of nonverbal cues as being detrimental to online relationship development
|
|
Cues filtered-In
|
We adapt and/or exploit cue limitations to forminterpersonal impressions and relationships
|