• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/22

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

22 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
Power to Take Property comes from where?
comes from 5th and 14th A
gives gov't police power control over health, safety, welfare, and morals
Takings Jurisprudence Balances What?
the private interests of using land as we want and the public interest in controlling land use
What is a taking?
taking private land for public use
Requires just compensation
Just compensation = market value (not private owners thoughts on value)
pre 1987 inquiry
1. was there a taking
2. was it for public use
3. was there just compensation
Modern inquiry
More thoughtful process
Does it advance a public purpose?
What is Public Use (PURPOSE)?

Euclid
Zoning is a legitimate exercise of police power
Zoning is not a taking as long as
a) it bears a rational relation to a legitimate goal (h,s,w,m)
b) it is reasonable and not arbitrary
Hawaii Housing Authority
(public benefit v. public use)
as long as rationally related to a conceivable public purpose
a) Act advances its purpose without the state's actual taking
b) gov't does not have to use the land
c) only the takings purpose, not its mechanics must pass the public use scrutiny
Berman
re-development of blighted areas OK becasue they were injurious to the h,s,w,m
County of Wayne
(private for private)
Property selected due to facts of independent public significance
a) Public necessity of extreme sort (RR)
b) transferee remains accountable to the public on its use
c) land selection based on public concern
Kelo
Upholds development plan of distressed community
Deference to State Legislature
What constitutes a taking?
1) Permanent physical occupation (even minor) is ALWAYS a taking (Loretto)
2) Temporary physical taking depends - leafletting/ free speech not a taking (Pruneyard)
3) Regulation of use
a) Euclid - zoning is not a taking
b) Penn. Coal - when regulation goes too far, it is a taking
Per Se Takings Before 1987

Loretto
Permanent Physical Occupation is a taking
Rationale - owners have property rights in a physical thing - right to possess, use, destroy
Gov't occupation destroys each
Owner has no power to occupy himself; cannot exclude
Permanent occupation destroys owners right to control use of his property
Penn Central (Regulatory)
Landmark Designation
Ad hoc factual inquiries
a) character of government action
b) interference with distinct investment backed expectations
c) degree of diminution in value
d) fair and just
e)reciprocity of benefit
f) remaining economic viability of the property
* d and e added later
Post 1987

Kelo
private development of economically distressed area
Deference to state legislature re: public purpose
- pursuant to a carefully considered development plan
- look at the "whole" rather than the individual lots
First English
When ordinance temporarily deprives owner of all economically viable use it is a taking
Broadening of Physical Occupation Factor

Nollan
Essential Nexus Test

there must be an essential nexus between th purpose of the exaction and the purpose served by denying the permit
Dolan
Rough Proportionality Test

There must be a rough proportionality between the exaction and the expected impact
Need an individualized determination that the required dedication is related both in nature and extent of impact on propsed development
Yee
rent control ordinance is not a taking
It does not compel physical occupation
Emergence of New Per Se Rule

Lucas
when all economically viable use is deprived = per se taking

Still EXCEPTION if intended use is a public nuisance
Recent Application

Palazzolo
No taking where portion of land is still usable after designation of a substantial portion
Tahoe
Moratorium on development not necessarily a taking
Physical Takings

Nectow
Leading case striking down unreasonable zoning

Unreasonable if it does not advance the public welfare and seriously injures the landowner

In this case the land could not be put to practical use