Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
6 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
- 3rd side (hint)
|
Restraint theory |
Herman and Mack (1975) attempt explain causes and consequences of restricting food intake Actually increases probability of eating |
Probability of eating |
|
|
Preload and Ice cream |
Herman and Mack test theory- counter regulatory eating Gave Pps 0,1,2 preload milkshakes Given unlimited ice cream after 0 milkshake - controlled ice cream 1 milkshake - dieters/nondieters eat same amount 2 milkshake - dieters uncontrolled ice cream intake went over diet "What the hell effect" |
What the hell effect |
|
|
"What the hell" effect |
A.ka. Boundary model Herman and Polivy Restricting food intake - increase gap hunger and fullness dieters Dieters create artificial low boundary food intake Dieters-no preload eat till boundary If boundary crossed tend to eat till satisfied, diet ruined |
Artificial boundary |
|
|
Pizza and Food cues |
Fedoroff et al (1997) food cues e.g pizza vs no food cues No cues - no difference in pizza intake between non dieters/dieters Food cues - dieters eat more than non dieters Food cues alone takes dieters into "What the hell" effect |
Food cues vs No cues |
|
|
Other reasons for "what the hell effect" |
Hetherton et al (1991) - other factors can trigger "WTH" effect other than food cues Stress,anxiety and upset in public speaking situation, electric shock, impossible task to complete Offered unlimited ice cream =overeat Stress, anxiety, upset accompanied diet to trigger "WTH" effect |
Stress,anxiety,upse |
|
|
IDA 5:2 Diet |
5:2 diet help to avoid "WTH effect" Diet minimises stress,anxiety or upset may more successful to avoid trigger "WTH" effect 5:2 - 5 restricting days 2 non restricting days Reduced stress from no restricting all the time higher success rate at weight loss |
Reduce stress |
