• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/39

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

39 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
Forester
"The Machine Stops"
Technological Determinism
machine weakens human interaction & communication
no resilience/adaptability - cna't take care of themselves w/out machine
machine weakens individuality & family values
Machine is in control of everyone's lives but then it starts to mess up & breaks.
Vashti = old lady
Kuno = son
STS Theory
Reject Technological Determinism/Think Co-shaping
Reject Technology as merely Material Objects/Think Sociotechnical Systems
Reject Technology as Value Neutral/Think Technology as Value-laden
Technological Determinism
Technology develops independently from society & in a linear fashion
Technology determines society
Ex. invention of cotton gin elongated slavery
Ex. Internet's availability brings democracy
Criticism of Technological Determinism
Humans/society make/affect technology based on what we want
Society chooses to accept/reject technology.
Technology brancehs out.
Teechnology isn't independent of society b/c there are regulations, needs funding
What are backings for technological determinism?
One tech is developed, it influences how we live, ex - iphone
Linear b/c need buildilng blocks
Long Island Bridge - rasist b/c designed to not let buses through
tech shapes & is shaped by society
Dangers of Tech Determ.
removes feelign of responsibility
humans can become too dependent on tech
Social Construction of Technology (SCOT)
interest groups have a stake in new tech - ex. NASA< military, gov't;
Joy
Robotics, nanotechnology & genetic engineering are dangerous
Ask whether we SHOULD do it not just whether we CAN do it
Ex. Manhatten project - atomic weapons
robotics are inevitable/natural --> technological determinism
Slow down pace of technology
Opposite - changes come gradually, we'll get used to them
The development of unchecked technology will inevitably lead to a loss of humanity. Communication between the scientific community and society should be increased.
Luddite Challenge (Joy)
Luddite (people who reject technology) Challenge - humans at mercy of machines & control of machines reserved to small group of elites
Moore's Lawy (Joy)
Moore's Law - predicts the exponential rate of improvement of semiconductor technology
Fraternity (Joy)
a fourth utopia in which individual happiness is associated with the happiness of others.
Importance of STS
ethics - want to be aware of what society wants/accepts
take responsibiltiy for what we make
Diachronic
Looking at something & how it changes over time rather than how it works at one time
Ex. Pinsch & Biker - history of bike & how it developed as one bike to the next in order; SCOT
Synchronic
how technology works (ANT)
Ex. fridge as technological system; organization/division of labor; depends on society - must have grocery stores
FRIDGE = SOCIOTECHNICAL System = Synchronic
*people are invovled in technology
Ex. cell phone - need towers, satellites, programming, other phones to call
Actor Network Theory (ANT)
network of actors - nonuman vs. human vs. nature - treat all same/equal
technical & social
ex. parenting, politics
actors - people developing system
network changes over time
also includes nature (non-human actors)
ex. it's annoying when internet is down in dorms
(Everything acst as a network/system)
Zhao
"Humanoid Social Robots"
Humans will get meaning from their side of the conversation so doens't matter if they're talking to a robot.
similar to human-human interaction
people under the Eliza Effect (being tricked into believing something, forgetting humanoids are just machines) will begin to be shaped by human-humanoid interactions - forcing society to become dependent on tech.
Fukuyama
"Prolongation of Life"
technological determinism b/c medicine affects politics & society
be careful what you wish for
longevity affects gov't power, ex. - dictators
more feminized population, less war
conflict b/w age groups in business - work place hierarchy
older retirement ages
quality vs. quantity of life
Johnson
"Computer Ethics"
ARGUES AGAINST tech determ.
tech determinism develops independently & linearly
argument against tech determinism - tech influenced by funding, regulations, market, gov't, legal environment, cultural sensibilities
tech is a social product
socio-technical system; ex. - rook
tech is involved in social arrangemnts - ex. - discriminating bridge
adopting tech = adopting form of life
tech shapes society but doesn't determine it
tech must be embedded into society to have an impact
Bijker & Pinch
"Social Construction of Facts and Artifacts"
DISPROVES tech determ.
SCOT - social groups direct every aspect of technology b/c people design tech & decide what to adopt
*multidirectional model - accounts for successes & failures; ex. bicycle
society decides on uses - stages of development
society has power to redefine tech
3 studies:
1. innovation - research->development->product->usage
2. history of tech - problems - descriptive historiography - don't generalize; focus more on successes then failures (this is a problem); bad - they think it's a linear path; need to study unsuccessful inventions
3. sociology of tech - work together
bike - relevant social groups - users, anticyclists, women; groups define function; sport vs. transportation; speed vs. safety
EPOR (Empirical Programme of Relativism) (Bijker & Pinch)
(SCOT)
3 stages -
1. open to interpretation
2. society limits flexibility
3. closure - advertise to say problem is gone; ex. - say bike is safe or redefine problem
Humanoid (Zhao)
robots with humanlike characterisitcs including physical resemblences & emotional responses
3 ways human-humanoid interactions are similar to human-human interactions
1. communicate in human dialogue (text, orally, body language, facial expressions)
2. understand pronouns & use I, we, he, engaged in dialogue
3. respect social norms - polite, take turns when speaking
cause people to treat humanoids like people; ex. - people are upset about shutting off robot
Sparrow
"In the Hands of Machines"
Caring for old people with robots is practically & morally wrong.
Selling point - they allow employees quality time with patients but really they'll just be in charge of more patients and not increase contact with them; negative - no more humans being company when change sheats
elderly need social interactions, they're not just problems
robots don't have feelings so they don't actually care for us - eliza effect
more robots = less human interaction = less emotional connection
doesn't take into count the human dignity of elderly & what they might want
"deception" = eliza effect
Levels of Robot Helpers (Sparrow)
1. Robo-Butlers - day to day tacks
2. menial tasks - take out trash, make bed in hospitals
(not viable b/c what if it breaks)
3. moniter people whose health is at risk - same as normal except now have a "robot" in room
4. COMPANIONS - people get bored, if likelike then remove advantages of being able to turn them off/pause makes it a toy not a companion
Eliza Effect
(Sparrow) - robots don't actually care for us, we just think they do; don't delude people into thinking they're cared for
Murphy's Law (Joy)
If something can go wrong, it will go wrong.
Hughes (Electrification)
"Electrification of America"
many elements go into developing a technology; need well-rounded leaders
1. Edison - inventor - Menlo Park - generate electricity in Manhattan, problem-solving, detailed economic calculation
2. Insull - manager - prez of Chicago Edison company, wanted a monopoly, started metering electricity, learned from European tech developments, diversified load - ice manufacturers; raise load factor w/ customers w/ steady need
3. Mitchell - financer - Electric Bond & Share Company - holding companies - small # of people owned lots of big companies, direct management & advice - sponsors; financial diversity
Hughes (Momentum)
"Technological Momentum"
Society & tech influence each other (synthesis of SCOT & tech determ.)
momentum = time dependent, longer you have tech, harder to change (shaped by social forces at first but then more so by technical forces)
Ex. EBASCO (Electrical Bond & Share Company) - mature tech system - managers & employees play larger role in expanding system leading to more social system; street, workplace, home lighting - changed working & leisure hours but then Holding Company Act of 1935 = no monopolies; shaped & was shaped by society; large company, lots of momentum til Great Depression
Tech Momentum -
acquired skill, durability; when get bigger - systems shape society more than it is shaped by society
SCOT = young system
tech determ = mature system
tech momentum provides flexible view
shaping a system can be forced by pressure (Great Depression); ex. cars forced to be cleaner b/c "green movement"
tech momentum becomes larger as system grows larger but isn't irresistible
Elliot
"Energy, Society, & Environment: Tech for a Sustaniable Future"
environmental impacts - gas/global warming/pollution
can ecosystem sustain high levels of ativity
3 conflicting human DOMAINS interact w/ environment -
1. consumer - want to buy tech
2. producer - use tech to make things
3. shareholder - own company stocks
all costs must be shared globally
environment is dependent on protection by humans - society & gov't but also able to constrain human activities; impose costs on human activities if they disturb key natural processes; nature can make human life on earth unviable if nature dies too
Gutmann
"Ethics of Synthetic Biology"
written b/c creation of 1st bacterial cell w/ synthetic genome
conclusion - we don't need regulation now but yes later
PRUDENT VIGILANCE - ongoing review of risks, benefits, ethics as matures
analyze 5 ethical principles
1. public beneficience - max public benefit, minimize public harm; ->public funding; evaluate the good vs. bad that could come from a technology
2. responsible stewardship - citizens & reps must act for betterment of all - including nature (prudent vigilance)->ethics education; humans stewards of everything else & the environment
3. intellectual freedom & responsibility - creative development & innovation & promote this but need REGULATORY PARSIMONY - use oversight to ensure justice, fairness, security, safety; promoting research - see where it goes
4. democratic deliberation - collaberative decisoin making - debate opposing view, citizen participation; endorse exchanges among scientific, religious, & civil groups; decisions don't need to be permanently binding
PRUDENT VIGILANCE (Gutmann)
ongoing review of risks, benefits, ethics as matures
REGULATORY PARSIMONY (Gutmann)
use only as much oversight as is truly necessary to ensure justice, fairness, security, safety while pursuing public good
Kuzma & Tanji
"Unpacking Synthetic Biology: Identification of Oversight Policy Problems and Options"
purpose - identify problems based on security, safety, & ethics
risks
1. environment (biosafety) - applications on agriculture
2. social (biosecurity) - prevent misuse; with increasing openness comes greater chance of info getting into wrong hands (terrorists)
3. economic (intellectual property) - patents, trade secrets vs. telling public/stakeholders
4. ethical issues (natural/unnatural)
biobricks - standards that can be put together & ordered online
environmental hazards - self-replicating
emerging tech is regulating by environmental tech agencies like FDA & Dept of Ag - is this enough?
intellectual property problem - whose is it?
provide protection w/out stifling openness for progress
biosecurity - bioterrorists
biosafety - self-replicating & take over environment
screen process so don't send virus to wrong person
conclusion - democratic decision making - regulation - light enough to allow future development but prevent
GOALS (Kuzma & Tanji)
high engineered complexity - understand & manipulate genetic code to program living cells
engineering & manufacturing standardization - biobricks - reusable component parts
novel life forms
systems scope to engineering - communicate to solve problems
Bess
"Icarus 2.0: A Historian's Perspective on Human Biological Enhancement"
anti- tech determ. b/c its our decision
not all tech change is for social good
human enhancement in medicine, prosthetics, & genetics
society is unprepared for dramatic change
same path that makes healing possible makes enhancing possible
ex. Ritalin (ADHD medicine), direct intervention of human genome, ex - GATTACA
by altering one component of genes, we can't predict exactly what will happen
we aren't powerless
enhancements divide humankind more - discrimination; lose touch with "all humans are equal"
Engel's Formulation - responsibilitly of citizens as consumers to decide how, pace, configuration, distribtion, enter our lives; educate ourselves, moniter developments, gov't regulation w/out stifling innovation
needs to be stopped globally to make an impact
ex. green movement was an international change
Vinck
"Sociotechnical Complexity: Redesigning a Shielding Wall"
engineer must do easy technical project but it's actually hard b/c he must communicate & cooperate w/ others
must coordinate b/w neighbors
must know how to express ideas
constraints change constantly
negotiation is important
Anderson
"Understanding engineering work & identity: a cross-case analysis of engineers w/in 6 firms"
looked at literature to compare engineering work, skills, constraints, & identities/values then compared in to real life by interviewing 6 firms in midwest US
work - messy, problem-solving; real world - depends on what client wants & communicate more than technical
skills - communication, teamwork, business skills (bridge b/w business & scientists)
constraints - scientific law, time, budget, ethics, safety, culture (in reality - mostly customer constraints, not as much about budget & deadline
identity - values - problem solver, team player, life long learner, motivated, trying new things
GATTACA Movie
Vincent pretends he is Gerome
Social determinism - parents want their kids to be best as possible
genetic alterations lead to genetic discrimination
Rumsfield Uncertainty Principle
what we do not know we do not know
pluralism (gutmann)
more wrong answers but also more opportunity to find right answers