• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/68

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

68 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
Observational study
merely observe things about sample
Randomized experiment
randomly assign people to one of two groups
Random assignments
made by doing something akin to flipping a coint ot determine group membership
When deciding if a study is reliable, what 7 things should be considered?
Funding source
The researchers themselves
Individuals/objects studied, how they were selected
Nature of measurements/questions asked
Setting of study
Differences in groups
Extent/size of effects
Open Question
Closed Question
Open: respondents allowed to answer in their own words.
Closed: respondents given list of alternatives.
Categorical variables
those we can place into a category but may not have any logical ordering
Ordinal variable
some sort of order imposed on categorical variables
Nominal variables
categorical variables that don't have any natural ordering
Measuerment variables/quantitative variables
those which we can record a numerical value and then order respondents according to those values
Interval variable
measurement variable in which it makes sense to talk about differences, but not ratios. Temperature
Ratio variable
measurement varaible with a meaningful value of zero. Pulse rate doubling.
Discrete variable
one for which you could actually count the possible responses
Continuous variable
Anthing within a given interval
Valid measurement
One that actually measures what it claims to measure
Reliable measurement
one that will give you or anyone else approximately the same result time after time when taken on the same object or individual
Biased measurement
A measurement that is systemaatically off the mark in the same direction
Variability
likely to differ from one time to next, or from one individual to the next because of unpredictable errors or discrepancies
Measurement error
Amount by which each measurement differs from the true value
Explanatory variable
What is being manipulated
Outcome/response variable
The outcome of the manipulation
Margin of error
Measure of accuracy; 1/ squ(n), where n is the number of people in the sample.
Simple random sample
Everyone in population has the same chance of being selected
Stratified random sample
Divide population into groups, then taking simple random sample from each. Used instead of simple sample when we need to get a group reading, when it's more accurate, when strata are geographically separated, when different intervieweres are used.
Cluster sampling
often confused with stratified sampling, but totally different; clusters are assigned, but instead of a sampling within each group, a random sample of clusters is picked to be measured as a whole.
Systematic sampling
Divide list into as many consecutive segments as needed, randomly choose a starting point in first segment, then sample at that same point in each segment.
Multistage sampling plan
Using a combination of sampling methods
Explanatory variable
attempts to explain or is purported to cause differences in response variable
Treatment
one or a combination of categories of the explanatory variables assigned by the experimenter
Randomized experiment
create differences in the explanatory variable and then examine the results
Observational study
observe differences in the explanatory variable and then notice whether these are related to differences in the response variable
Confouding variable
individuals who differ in in explanatory variable likely to differ in confounding variable; confounding variable affects the response variable
Interactions
occur qhen the effect of one explanatory variable on the response variable depends on what's happening with another explanatory variable
Randomization
relted to the idea of random selection
Control groups
Don't receive treatment, handled identically
Double blind
Neither particpants nor researcher taking measurements know who had which treatment
Single blind
only one of the two, participant or researcher, knows who got treatment
Matched pair designs
Experimental designs that use either two matched individuals or the same individual to receive each of the two treatments
Randomized black design (block design)
Extension of matched pair design to three or more treatments
Random assigment to treatments reduces...
unknown systematic baises
Matched pairs, repeated measures, and blocks are used to reduce..
known sources of natural variability in response
Potential complications for experiments
1) Confouunding variables
2) interacating variables
3) Placebo, Hawthrone, and experimenter effects
4) Ecological validity and generalizability
Solution to confounding variables
randomization
Solution to interactinv variables
researchesrs measure and report variables that may interact with main explanatory variables
Placebo, hawthorne, and experimenter effects solution
double-blind and control group
Solution to ecological validty and generalizability
(Variables being removed from natural setting)
No ideal solutions; design experiments that can be performed in natural setting with random sample
case-control studies
a type of observational study; cases who have a particular attribvute are compared with controls who don't have that attribute
Retrospective and prospective studies
observational; retrospective look backward, prospectrive follows participants into the future and events are recorded. prospective preferred.
Complications for observational studies
Confounding variables and implications of causation
Extending the results inappropriately
Using the past as a source of data
Mode
most common value
Median
center
Mean
average
Range
distance between least and most
Unimodal histogram or stemplot
one prominant peak
Bimodal histogram or stemplot
two prominent peaks
Skewed to the right
higher values more spread out and lower (skewed part is low part)
Skewed to the left
Lower values are more spread out
Five number summary
Lowest and highest values, median, lower and upper quartiles
Quartiles
median of the two halves of the ordered list
Variance
Standard deviation is the square root of the variance
Frequency curve
smooth picture of population
Normal distribution of freuqnecty curve
bell shaped
Standardized score
represents the number of standard deviations of the observed value or score falls from the mean
Standard score is also known as
z score
Standard normal curve
Normal curve with a mean of 0 and a standard deviation of 1
Standardized score
(Observed value - mean)/standard deviation
To find percential
get standardized score, then look up percentaile in table
To find observed value from percentile
look iup percentile in table, find standaridzed score. COmpute the oberseved value: mean + (standardized score x standard deviation)
Empirical rule
68% fall within 1 standard deviation
95% fall within 2 standard deviation
99.7 fall within 3 standard deviation