Speech Final

Front 1

Primary tension

Back 1

Social Tension and discomfort in members that stems from interpersonal sorces

Front 2

Conflict

Back 2

The express struggle that occurs when interdependent parties perceive incompatible goals or scarce resources.

Front 3

Problem

Back 3

The discrepancy between what should be happening and what actually is happening.

Front 4

Distributed leadership

Back 4

The concept that group leadership is responsibility of the group as a whole not just a design leader.

Front 5

PERT

Back 5

Program Evaluation and Review Technique

Front 6

Group Climate

Back 6

Group emotional and relational atmosphere

Front 7

Critical Thinking

Back 7

Solving through logic and reasoning

Front 8

Question of Value

Back 8

What is right good or acceptable

Front 9

Traits approach

Back 9

Leader has certain approach that distinguish them from followers

Front 10

Status

Back 10

Importance or power of a member

Front 11

Leader

Back 11

Member who influences others through communication

Front 12

Norm

Back 12

Informal rule enforced by peer pressured

Front 13

conformity

Back 13

Follow group norms

Front 14

Anticipatory phase

Back 14

Group solicitation phase of initial expectations

Front 15

Autocratic leaders

Back 15

Leaders who try to dominate and control a group

Front 16

Inference

Back 16

Make a leap from fact to conclusion

Front 17

Group think

Back 17

The tendency of some groups not to subject information reasoning, and proposals to through critical analysis

Front 18

Assimilation Phase

Back 18

Full member integration

Front 19

Neutrality

Back 19

Demonstrates lack of understanding and concerns indifferent

Front 20

Deviate

Back 20

A group member that differs in some important way from the rest of the group members

Front 21

Substantive conflict

Back 21

Conflict resulting from disagreement over ideas information reasoning or evidence

Hint 21

The speaker committee debated whether one entertaining or educational speaker would be better

Front 22

Affective Conflict

Back 22

Resulting from personality clashes, like dislikes, and competition of powers.

Hint 22

Speaker series committee member Lori and Kevin did not like each other and missed no opportunity to disagree or belittle each other

Front 23

Procedural Conflict

Back 23

Conflict Resulting from disagreement about how to do something

Hint 23

Members of a group may disagree about whether they should make decisions by consensus of whether majority rule will suffice.

Front 24

Inequality conflict

Back 24

Conflict about perceived unequal workload or contributions to the group efforts

Front 25

Coalitions

Back 25

Members who band together to pool their resources and power to try to increase their bargain leverage

Front 26

Distributive Approach

Back 26

Fixed resources must be distributed among parties to the conflict; thus whenever someone wins, someone else losses.

Front 27

Integrative Approach

Back 27

The conflict management approach that assumes that solutions can be created to satisfy every party to the conflict

Front 28

Conflict management Styles

Back 28

Avoidance Accommodation Competition Collaboration Conciliatory Remarks Compromise

Front 29

Avoidance

Back 29

Ignores conflict

Front 30

Accommodation

Back 30

One person appeases or gives in to the other

Front 31

Competition

Back 31

One person attempts to dominate or force the outcome to his advantage

Front 32

Collaboration

Back 32

The assertive cooperative conflict management style that assumes a solution can be found that fully meets the needs of all parties to a conflict.

Front 33

Compromise

Back 33

Each party must give up something to get something

Front 34

Facework

Back 34

Communication strategies used for preserving ones own or others self esteem.

Front 35

5 steps P-Mops

Back 35

Identify problem
possible solutions
Evaluate solutions
Decision making
Implement

Front 36

Group Polarization

Back 36

Groups make more extreme decisions that they would make individually

Front 37

Ad Hominem Attack

Back 37

Attacks person rather than the argument

Front 38

criteria

Back 38

Evaluate various options

Front 39

False Dilemma

Back 39

incorrectly poses as an either or choice

Front 40

Faulty Analogy

Back 40

stretches an analogy too far and has limited credibility