• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/37

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

37 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

affect

automatic response that something is good or bad

mood

a feeling state that is not clearly linked to some event

emotion

a conscious evaluative reaction to some event

James-Lange Theory

bodily processes of emotion come first, then minds perception



emotional stimulus>physiological arousal>emotion



footsteps in the hallway>increased heart rate>fear

Schacter-Singer Theory

has two components: bodily state of arousal and cognitive label



emotion stimulus>physiological arousal/cognitive label>emotion

risk-as-feelings hypothesis

the idea that people rely on emotional processes to evaluate risk, with the result that their judgments may be biased by emotional factors

affect-as-information hypothesis

judge something as good or bad by asking self, "how do I feel about it?"

affective forecasting

ability to predict one's emotional reactions to future events

Components of Attitude

A: Affect (emotion)


B: Behavior


C: Cognition

cognitive dissonance theory

inconsistencies produce psychological discomfort, leading to people to rationalize their behavior or change their attitudes

self-perception theory

people develop their attitudes by observing their own behavior and concluding what attitudes must have caused it

Paradigms for inducing Cognitive Dissonance

-insufficient justification: dissonance may occur when we don't have a "good enough" reason to violate attitude


-effort justification: finding that when people suffer or work hard or make sacrifices, they will try to convince themselves it was worthwhile


-difficult decisions: like something more after make the choice

mere exposure effect

tendency for people to come to like things simply because they see of encounter them repeatedly

overjustification effect

occurs when the expected external incentive decreases a person's intrinsic motivation to perform a task

normative influence

going along with the crowd in order to be liked and accepted

informational influence

going along with the crowd because you think the crowd knows more than you do

central vs. peripheral persuasion

central: depends on quality and strength of argument



peripheral: depends on "non-issue" aspects of communication

conformity

yielding to implicit social pressure (modeling)

compliance

yielding to explicit/direct request from someone of equal or lesser status (asking)

obedience

yielding to explicit/direct response from someone of high status (ordering)

auto-kinetic effect

illusion, caused by very slight movements of the eye, that a stationary point of light in a dark room is moving

sleeper effect

finding that, over time, people separate the message from the messanger

Compliance Strategies

-foot in the door


-door in the face


-foot in the mouth


-free sample


-low ball

Foot-in-the-Door technique

after agreeing to a small request, people are more willing to agree to a larger one



-perceptual assimilation


-commitment/consistency

Door-in-the-Face technique

after refusing an initial large request, people are more likely to comply with second smaller request



-perceptual contrast


-reciprocity

Free Sample technique

reciprocity, feel guilty like must buy product



-commitment/consistency


-reciprocity

Low Ball technique

getting people to agree to a request and then give additional details



-commitment/consistency

Foot-in-the-Mouth technique

"so am I" study



asked college students in spirit wear if they were a student, so am I, then asked to give money



-friendship/liking

Compliance: Common Mechanisms

-friendship/liking


-scarcity


-commitment/consistency


-perceptual assimilation


-perceptual contrast


-reciprocity

Why don't people always help?

-informational influence: we look to others to understand ambiguous situations


-evaluation apprehension: fear of looking foolish or acting inappropriately


-diffusion of responsibility: someone else will help


-cognitive busyness: don't notice needs of others


-culture of narcissim


-perceived costs

Kitty Genovese Case

-raped and stabbed in alley for over 30 minutes


-38 neighbors heard assault and looked out windows


-45 minutes until police were called


-diffusion of responsibility

Bystander Effect Study



Darley & Latane

-tendency for people in groups to be less likely to help someone in need


Seizure study: participating in study on "personal problems," one participant in other cubicle has seizure


-if perceived alone, likely to help


-if one person, over half to help


-if 4 people, below half to help

Good Samaritan Study



Darley & Batson

seminary students assigned to give speech over either best jobs in their field or story of good samaritan


Conditions: late, on time, early


-over half ahead of time stopped to help


-about half on time stopped to help


-under half late stopped to help

Cost Analysis Model



Piliavan, Piliavan, Rodin

-experience unpleasant state of arousal


-label/interpret arousal state


-if sympathetic label, do cost analysis

Insufficient Justification



Festinger & Carlsmith

boring task (turning pegs)


-either lie or don't lie to next subject that it was interesting


-paid $1 or $20


-then asked about attitude of experiment after


-$1 group had high dissonance b/c insufficient justification, feel bad b/c lied for just a dollar so they liked and said it was interesting

Asch Conformity Study

lines


-asked participants which line matched original


-with one dissenter felt more confident


-with no dissenter, often changed opinions to that of group

Aronson & Mills

??