• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/29

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

29 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

Bystander effect

Not my responsibility


Waiting for someone else to intervene


There is danger in number (don't go in a group)


Diffusion of responsible


90% of the time a person who is by themselves will help




Reasons: Psychological Paralysis (Can't move, someone else will do it, danger to my life, we freeze) We don't go and help

Pluralistic Ignorance

Assuming that no one in the group perceives things as we do

Diffusion of Responsibility

The presence of others make each people feel less responsible

Bystander Effect

Nurses or qualified to help unless they perceive the situation as something they know

Bystander Calculus Model (Pilavin et al. 1981)

We do cognitive algebra, to determine we should help (this is immediate results)


Arousal- Perceiving a situation (determination if it's critical)


Labelling- label situation as fearsome,dangerous (emotional label) depending on how critical you give it a label


Evaluation of outcomes Will the situation cause you distress or puts you in dangerous. Will you help or won't help (Personal cost & Empathy Cost) Men more likely to have ulterior motives



Altruism

Being selfless to help others regardless of danger, empathetic




Situational influences: Characteristics of the victim, more helpful on the train opposed to the street, no easy escape, exposure to helpful role models, mood (more likely in a positive mood), being in a hurry




Enlightenment effect: Public knowledge about bystander effects helps

Hedonistic

Try to avoid pain and distress

Social Loafing

People working in group, feel less responsible for the outcomes of a project then the would working alone




(exert more pressure pulling the rope when alone) Peer review adjusts this




Individualist vs Collectivist Countries

Aggression: Hurting Others

Behaviour intended to harm others- physical, verbal or mental (hostility towards people)




Behaviour that results in personal injury or destruction of property (Bandura,1973)

Why indulge in aggression

situation influence, interpersonal provocation, frustration(something impeding your goals), alcohol/drugs, temperature(warmer countries more aggressive), media influences, aggressive cues (children watching violent movies, turbans as cultural differences), arousal (provoke you)

Differences in Aggression

Men are more aggressive physically - testosterone, due to subtle, relational aggression (gossip, being mean) Direct vs Relational 'silent treatment'




Cultural Differences: Culture of Honor break the norms of society(India)


Fight in group- Japan/china Western more likely 1 to 1 battles




Personality traits, irritability, mistrust, impulsivity, lack of closeness







Types of Aggression

Hostile/Impulsive- Deliberately abusing someone aiming to hurt them, cannot be controlled




Instrumental Aggression: Aggressive behaviour to a achieve a goal, means to a goal

Attitudes

A psychological tendency that is expressed by evaluating a particular entity with some degree of favour or disfavour (Eagly & Chaiken, 1993)




Formed because of social learning


-Personality will reflect the attitudes you have


-Recognition Heuristic: Experience shapes attitudes



Changing Attitudes

Difficult to change attitudes, Attitudes do not always predict behaviour




Low self-monitoring - Show true attitudes towards something


High self-monitoring- Chameleons, less predictable


Cognitive Dissonance Theory (Festinger, 1950)


We at all times want to avoid disharmony, don't want unpredictability. Associated with conflictive thoughts

Cognitive Theory

-People who got $1 (must be interesting, if paid poorly) More justification then task was interesting


-People who got $20 (felt justified in saying it was boring)




Want to rationalise our behaviour and avoid dissonance

Self-perception theory Vs Impression Management theory

Aquire attitudes by observing our own behaviors


vs


We don't really change our attitudes, but just tell the experiments we did

Persuasion

Can be used attitudes by varying techniques

Dual Processing Model Routes

Central route (more convincing, high level arguments)


Peripheral route (low-level arguments)

Foot in the door technique

Small request first, as the door opens, bigger and bigger request

Door in the face technique

Large request is made first, then go to a smaller request

Low-ball technique

All these adds on bring up the price. original price 20, say will give it to you for 10, add $10 on additional upgrades

But you are free technique

Guilting, 50 cents for these authors but you are free to do as you want, likely to put more in



Persuasion through the messenger

-Famous/Attractive person endorses it


-Presumed expertise- listen to an expert


-Implicit egotism (similarity) we look favourably upon people who resemble us

Prejudice(negative attitude) and Discrimination (behavior)

Stereotype- Shortcut: A belief about a groups characteristic that we apply to most members of that group


Stereotypes lead to prejudice




Seed of prejudice --> Ultimate attribution error--> attributing the negative behaviour to entire groups to disposition

In group bias

Tendency to favour individuals inside our group relative to members outside our group

Out group homongenity

Tendency to view all people outside our group as highly similar --> easy to dismiss

Roots of prejudice

Scapegoat hypothesis- competition over scarce resources




Just world hypothesis- blaming the victim guarantee status quo




Conformity: Social norms (Trying to conform to that group)




Individual difference: authoritarian personality more likely to be prejudiced




Religious people more prejudices

Implicit prejudice vs explicit prejudice

Implicit prejudice- we are unaware


Explicit prejudice - we are aware

Combatting Prejudice

Encourage people to work towards a shared higher purpose




Jigsaw classrooms: Education approach designed to minimize prejudice