• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/21

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

21 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
Massey & Fischer (2006)
Black and Latino students at exclusive universities show negative effects from segregation
Steele & Aronson (1995)
When race was made salient, students of color had decreased performance on a standardized test.
Yeung & von Hippel (2008)
When women were reminded that men were "better drivers", they were twice as likely to hit someone while driving without distraction.
Clark & Clark (1947)
Black children as young as 3 were more likely to chose a white doll as "good" and a black doll as "bad".
Word, Zanna, & Cooper (1974)
If white interviewees were treated as if they were black, they had lower performance during an interview.
Noel et al. (1995)
In public, newcomers to a group were more hostile towards outgroup individuals than other members of that group.
Crocker et al. (1987)
Low self-esteem = lower opinion of outgroup members. BUT, high self-esteem = lower opinion of outgroup members WHEN self-esteem is threatened.
Sherif (1956)
Boys in two groups in a summer camp became hostile when resources limited. Group hostility was lowered when groups were made to work together towards a common goal.
Darley & Latane (1968)
People were connected to another individual solely by microphone. When they heard the sounds of the other person having a seizure, they were more likely to leave their room and help if they believed they were the only one listening.
Asch (1955)
People sitting around a table report which of a number of lines is longest, shortest, etc. People much more likely to say wrong answer if the group does.
Baron, Vandello, & Brunsman (1996)
Students shown pictures very quickly were asked to pick a criminal out of a line up. When stressed AND told to be accurate, they were more likely to conform. When not stressed AND told to be accurate, they were LESS likely to conform.
Quinn & Schlenker (2002)
People told to be accurate and were later held accountable for their choice were most likely to NOT conform.
Bond & Smith (1996)
Collectivist societies were more likely to conform
Aronson & O'Leary (1982)
Men told to turn off shower when soaping up. Those who saw a "model" were more likely to perform this behavior.
Cialdini, Reno, & Kallgren (1990)
People who saw others throw away litter were less likely to litter themselves.
Schacter & Singer (1962)
When injected w/epinephrine and not told of the side effects, participants were more likely to mimic the actions of another "participant" who was either mad or happy.
Schultz et al. (2007)
Energy conservation
Petty & Cacioppo (1984)
Students read arguments for or against exit exams.
-High or Low relevance
-High or Low quality arguments
-3 or 9 arguments
Miller & Campbell (1959)
During a "trial" large gap between first and second argument led to Recency effect, large gap between second argument and verdict led to Primacy effect
Miller Brickman & Bolen (1975)
Kids and neatness
Deutsch & Gerard (1955)
When you must actively make a judgement and present it in public, you stick with it.