• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/94

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

94 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
A person, in anticipation of failure, develops explanations and behavioral reactions to minimize ability deficits as possible attributions for the failure. This process is referred to as:
Self-handicapping
Self-fulfilling prophecy
refers to a prediction made about some future behavior or event that modifies interactions so as to produce what is expected.
Self-perception theory
is the idea that people observe themselves in order to figure out the reasons they act as they do; people infer what their internal states are by perceiving how they are acting in a given situation.
Self-serving bias
refers to a class of attributional biases in which people tend to take credit for their successes and deny responsibility for their failures.
Social Judgment Theory
person categorizes new information or positions into one of three zones or latitudes:
latitude of acceptance
latitude of non-commitment
latitude of rejection
Social Judgment Theory

latitude of acceptance
The latitude of acceptance contains all the positions on a particular topic that a person finds acceptable
Social Judgment Theory

latitude of non-commitment
contains the positions that are neutral for the person.
Social Judgment Theory

latitude of rejection
contains all the positions on an issue that a person rejects
Social Judgment Theory

latitude of acceptance - Anchor
single position that a person finds the most acceptable
Glick and Fiske’s (1996, 2001) Ambivalent Sexism Theory (AST) describes two complementary, cross-culturally prevalent ideologies called
hostile sexism

benevolent sexism
Both hostile and benevolent sexism predict
gender inequality
Both hostile and benevolent attitudes about each gender encompass three domains of female-male relations instantiating power differences and interdependence:
patriarchy
gender differentiation
heterosexuality
Hostile sexism is defined as an
adversarial view of gender relations in which women are viewed negatively, as being competitive and seeking to control men
Benevolent sexism is
subjectively positive, rewarding women for conforming to a patriarchal status quo and characterizing them as morally pure, to be protected, and adored
Solomon, Pyszczynski, and Greenberg’s terror management theory proposes anxiety or “terror” results from the conscious awareness that human beings have of the inevitability of their death and is best dealt with by:
self-esteem and a cultural worldview
A person with high self-esteem is likely to make what type of attributions for his or her achievements?
internal and specific
Experimenters find conformity is lowest when the:
subject has a "partner" in the group who shares his or her opinion
A "script" in social psychology is:
a representation of a stereotyped sequence of actions

a schema
To enhance a work team's creative problem-solving using brainstorming, you would recommend that:
team members work individually to come up with creative solutions and then present their ideas to each other and the leader
A lab subject heard a woman in the next lab fall and cry for help. In this "lady in distress" experiment, a person was least likely to help when tested with:
a passive confederate
A lab subject heard a woman in the next lab fall and cry for help. In this "lady in distress" experiment, a person was most likely to help when:
alone in the lab
Positive and negative life events are likely to have which of the following types of effect on a person's sense of satisfaction and well-being?
short-term but not long-term effects
A peripheral message is more likely to alter a person's attitude if the receiver:
feels happy
According to the Elaboration Likelihood Model,
persuasive messages can be communicated via a central route or a peripheral route
The central route is used when
think carefully about the contents of the message.
Accordiong to ELM, when listeners do not think carefully about an argument's content,
they rely more on superficial (peripheral) cues.
Peripheral cues include the messengers'
perceived attractiveness or expertise, and the receivers' mood.
According to the ELM, a positive mood, and in some cases fear, has been shown to
increase the likelihood of attitude change.
A man who is very shy goes out with a friend. Suddenly, a crowd breaks out into a riot and the man becomes very aggressive. This is an example of
deindividuation
Deindividuation, which occurs under conditions of anonymity, refers to
the loss of a person's identity and a loosening of normal restraints against deviant behavior.
Social power refers to
the means by which a person is influenced by another (i.e., expert, legitimate, reward, coercive, or referent power).
Social comparison refers to
the process by which we evaluate our opinions and abilities by comparing them to those of others.
Additive tasks permit the
addition of individual efforts so that the outcome is a combination of individual contributions.
On conjunctive tasks
everyone must achieve a given goal in order for the task to be complete. As a result, task performance depends on the performance of the least competent group member.
On disjunctive tasks,
the group must choose one of many alternative ways to do the task. Thus, performance on a task depends on the performance of the most competent group member, because if one person can complete the task, the task gets completed.
On compensatory tasks,
the average performance of all group members represents the group's product
Relational aggression is
described as any behavior that is intended to harm someone by damaging or manipulating relationships with others
The two types of relational aggression are
proactive and reactive
Proactive relational aggression is
when behaviors are a means for achieving a goal, such as excluding someone from a group in order to maintain one’s own social status.
Reactive relational aggression is behavior that is
in response to provocation, with the intent to retaliate.
The theory that we engage in prosocial behavior to relieve our own state of emotional distress at another's plight is referred to as:
negative state relief theory
Research by Weiner and others has suggested that people who have high expectations for future performance (such as high achievers) tend to attribute their failure to ...
lack of effort
Effort is an ...
internal, unstable, and controllable factor.
Definition of Social Psych
the scientific study of how an individual's feelings, thoughts, and behaviors are influenced by social stimuli
Field Theory
Lewin

B= F (Person * Enviornment)
approach - approach
two positive goal objects

initial ambivalence, reduced when person moves toward on of the goals
avoidance - avoidance
person must choose between two negatively valenced alternatives

Resolved by leaving field or vacillation, reaching an equilbrium at equal distance from each goal
approach - avoidance
both drawn and repelled by same situation

Causes vacillation unitl person reaches stable equilibrium

As person gets closer to goal approach gradient is not as steep as avoidant gradient
Zeignarik Effect
experimental application of field theroy

unfinished things / difficult things remembered better
Overjustification Hypothesis
when individuals are externally rewarded for a task they previously found inherently enjoyable, their interest in the task will decrease

predicted by self-perception theory
Self-perception theory
in absence of clear internal cues, individuals make attributions about their own attitudes and behaviors by observing their own behavior or other external cues
Social comparison Theroy
People are uncertain about their abilities or opinions (objective info not available) evaluate selves by comparison to others

Downward comparisons likely when individual feels threatened, or low self esteem
Self-verification theory
people seek confirmation fo their self-concept regardless of whether it is positive or negative

Prefer to be right, rather than happy

Depressed seek negative feedback
Fundamental Attribution Error
Explaining causes of others behavior by focusing on personality characteristics rather than situational determinants
Actor-Observer effect
Others - personality (internal)

Own - situational (external)
Self-serving bias
Success - internal

Failure - external
Weiner's Attributional Theory of Motivation and Emotion
3 dimensional taxonomy:

1. Internal - External
2. Stable - Unstable
3. Controllable - Uncontrollable
Rotter

Locus of Control
Internal LOC - view selves as cause, achievement oriented

External LOC - view external factors as cause, less self-confident, more self-conscious, less achievement oriented
Locus of Responsibility
Dimension of Attributional theory: measure of degree of responsibility, or blame, one places on the individual or system
Locus of Responsibility

4 world views
IC/IR = success/failure determinded by individual

IC/ER = Ability to shape life, external barriers exist

EC/IR = Marginalized, no control, blame self

EC/ER = little control, blame system
False Consensus bias
tendency to overestimate that degree to which others conform to us in terms their opinions, attributes, behavior
Confirmation Bias
tendency to seek, interpret, and create information that verifies our existing beliefs
Trait Negativity Bias
people weigh negative information more heavily than positive information
Sterotype
Cognitive belief that associates groups people with certain trait(s)
Prejudice
Negative feelings about persons based solely on their group membership
Discrimination
Behavior directed against persons due to group identification
Allport on prejudice
Due to internalizatin, anti-discrimation laws will not have immediate impact
Social Identity Theory
Tajfel's theroy that social identity is enhanced by believing our own group is attractive and by belittling members of other groups

Implies that prejudice and discrimination are outgrowth of drive to enhance our own self-esteem
Contact Hypothesis
Under certain conditions direct contact between members of hostile groups will reduce stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination
Contract Hypothesis

Conditions
1. Two equal status groups
2. Personal contact
3. Mutual cooperative activity
4. Social norms must favor/encourage group cooperation
Variables related to Interpersonal Attractiveness
1. Physical proximity
2. Similarity
3. Complementarity
4. Physical Attractiveness
5. Self Disclosure (moderate/gradual
6. Reciprocity
7. Cost and Benefits
Bystander Apathy
Inhibition of helping behavior increased when:
1. Diffusion of responsibility
2. Social Influence (cues)
3. Evaluation Apprehension (embarrased)
4. Do not want to be seen as causing situation - responsible
Facotrs affecting Conformity
1. Group size - 3/4 optimal
2. Unanimity - 1 dissenter decreases conformity
3. Ambiguity - increases conformity
4. Cohession
5. Personality - low self-esteem, low intelligence, more likely to conform
Minority Influence
Most powerful if:
1. Minority position consistent
2. Minority not perceived as rigid
3. Minority must not waver
4. Not arguing based on one's own interest
French and Raven bases of social power
Coercive
Reward
Expert
Legitimate
Referent
Informational
Social Facilitation
Presence of others:

enhance performance on simple task

Impairs performance on complex task
Group Polarization more likely if..
1. number of persuasive arguments increased
2. Positions known before discussin
3. Ingroup status
Groupthink
Factors associated with:
1. Group cohesion
2. Similar backgrounds/group isolatin
3. Strong leader
4. Lack of systematic procedures
Strategies to reduce Groupthink
1. Avoid insulation
2. Leader impartial
3. Encourage critical review
Group Task Classificatin
Additive - sum of all members (noise at game)

Conjunctive - individual poorest performance (mtn climbing)

Disjunctive - individual best performance (Best idea)

Compensatory - avg member
Semantic differential scale
attitudes toward object are measured in terms of three dimensions:
Evaluative
Potentcy
Activity
Bogus Pipleine
used to combat socially desired responding on self-report measure

Elaborate mechanical device that does nothing
Attitudes are good predictor of behavior when...
1. Specific not general
2. Well informed
3. Info comes from experience
4. Attitude is accessible to awareness
Attitudes lead to...
behavioral intention rather than directly to behavior
Cognitive Dissonance

4 steps
1. Descrepant behavior has negative consequenes
2. Person feels responsible for action
3. Discrepancy produces physiological arousal
4. Arousal attributed to behavior
Heiders Balance Theory
liking and agreeing go together
Variables related to attitude change
1. Communicator
2. Communication
3. Target Audience
Communicator
Credibility - Competence/trustworthiness

Sleeper effect, as time passes distinciton between credible and not credibile blurs
Communication
1.Amount of info (more is better unless weak)
2. Repetition - Mere exposure effect
3. One sided vs two sided
4. Moderate amount of discrepancy most effective
5. Appeals to fear should include how to avoid fear
6. Primacy and recency
Elaboration Likelihood Model
Central route - most effective for well informed and not distracted

Peripheral route - most effective for Uninformed and distracted
Crowding
High density enhacnes current feelings both positive and negative

Distraction reduces feeling of crowding

Effects of crowding more negative for males
Personal space
need increases until 21

low self-esteem need more

Authoritarian need more
Applications of Social Psychology and the Law
1. Jury size <12 = conviction
2. Child witness less acurate (do not misremember being touched)
3. Procedure, 2 instructions to jury better than 1
4. Presenation of evidence, graphic evidence lowers standard of proof needed
5. Pretrial pub leads to conviction
6. Inadmissible evidence is considered anyway
7. Eyewitness - reconstructive memory
Glick and Fiske’s (1996, 2001) Ambivalent Sexism Theory
describes two complementary, cross-culturally prevalent ideologies called hostile and benevolent sexism, both of which predict gender inequality