• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/18

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

18 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
Discontinuity effect
-intergroup behavior is much more competitive than inter-individual behavior
-Often represented by the prisoner’s dilemma game
Discontinuity
-reason for intergroup competition
-schemas of fear and greed
-if you fear that the other group will act competitively, you act competitively as well
Social Identity Theory
-reason for intergroup competition
-part of our self esteem comes from the groups that we belong to and therefore we want our groups to do better than other groups – leading to competitive behavior – even if you have been placed into a group with people you do not know – becomes us vs them
-does not happen when it involves 2 individuals – only groups that tend to do this
Diffusion of Responsibility
-reason for intergroup competition
-people do not feel 100% responsible for being competitive when in a group – responsibility is diffused across the group – individuals do feel responsible
Social Support for Greed
-reason for intergroup competition
-study was done where they planted a confederate in each group – confederate told to act 1 of 3 ways: offer a potentially competitive notion, don’t say anything, offer the more cooperative notion – if confederate offers competitive notion- group performed competitively 80% of the time – social support
Deindividuation
-reason for intergroup competition
-in group settings it is easier to be deindividuated – other group members may not necessarily know who you are – tends to lead toward competition
Reciprocity effects
-reason for intergroup competition
-if you behave competitively to me, I’m going to behave competitively back
-individuals sometimes feel bad about having acted competitively – groups do not feel this way
Ingroup-outgroup bias
-reason for intergroup competition
-ingroup – you think your own group is more deserving, better and therefore it is okay to act competitively
-outgroup – different and less deserving – not as good a group as your group
Group Norms
-reason for intergroup competition
-norms emerge within groups that do not emerge the same way to individuals
-it becomes normative and okay to behave competitively – people expect groups to behave competitively
-individuals do not have this same norm – norm is to cooperate
Contact Effects
(reduction of intergroup competition)
hypothesis: if you put people from different groups together and have them have equal contact on equal footing – the groups will begin to see how similar they are instead of furthering their beliefs that they are different from each other – eg. Brown vs. the Board of Education – ending segregation in public school systems
Robber's Cave Study
summer camp, 10 yr old boys, similar backgrounds, created competition using sports,etc. Intergroup competition increased and teams did things to eachother; tried to reduce by contact effects but was it didnt work. "Superior level goals" reduced competition (boys from different groups had to solve problem for good of camp)
Jigsaw Classroom
each person in class is responsible for a piece of the project; each person is dependent on the others and if the others are doing their parts correctly; decreased intergorup competition; students saw each other as more similar b/c they had to rely on each other to do well
Positive Intergroup Examples
two groups; first created intergroup conflict then took a group member from each group and they had to do a task together; intergroup competition dropped b/c if one person knew a member of the other group they were less inclined to think the other group was bad
Stereotypes
set of beliefs about attributes of a group
prejudice
unfavorable attitude about a group
discrimination
unfavorable behavior toward a group
measurement of prejudice/discrimination
direct: self-report/diagnostic ratio
indirect: physiological responses (implicit association tests IAT)
diagnostic ratio
assign adjectives that apply to particular group and apply adjectives applying to humans as a whole; if you apply more negative adjectives to outgroup then it is assumed you have negative streotype regarding that group