• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/57

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

57 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

Terry Pat Down (Motor Vehicle)

-Valid M/V Stop


-R.A.S. Person/Vehicle is Armed & Dangerous


-Vehicle Contains Weapons


-Search of Passenger Compartments


-Search for Weapons Only


-Search only where weapons can be/fit


-You can open closed containers


-Locked containers are not addressed



3rd Party Consent

-If both parties present, one says yes, and one says no, your answer is no.


-Consenting party must have possessed common authority over/or/offer sufficient relationship to the premises or effects sought to be inspected.

Scope of Terry Search

-Pat down of outer garments


-Can only pat down for weapons

Passenger Compartment Of Vehicle


(Court Definition)

All the space reachable w/o exiting the vehicle

Container (Court Definition)

Any object capable of holding another object


(New York V. Belton)

Constructive Possession

Possession w/o physical contact

Consent (Motor Vehicle)

-Must be free/voluntary


-No duress/coercion


-Can be limited/withdrawn


-Locked containers need special consent


-Cannot prolong stop if it is a valid M/V stop



Reasonable Articulable Suspicion


(R.A.S)

Not a hunch, but less than probable cause

Plain View Doctrine

-Legal right to be there


-Inadvertant AND


-Officer has P.C. to believe it is contraband/evidence and can sieze it.

Exigent Circumstances

-Serious Offenses


-Destruction of evidence


-Fleeing felon/escape


-Harm to others

4th Amendment Protects

Against unreasonable search/seizures of houses, persons, papers, effects.

Citizen Contact

-Work off hunch/consentual conversation


-People may leave at anytime

Investigative Dentention

-R.A.S. that criminal activity is a foot


-Brief dentention of a person


-To confirm/disprove involvement in a crime

Curtilage

-Protected by 4th amendment


*the area to which extends the intimate activity associated w/ sanctity of a man's house and privacies of his life.

Katz Test

1. SUBJECTIVE: Victims expectation of privacy


2. OBJECTIVE: Society's determination of reasonable expectation of privacy

When Is A Person Seized?

-When there is a physical seizure


-When there is a submission to authority


-When there is a show of authority

Exceptions To The 4th Amendment

-Search Incident to arrest(Person)


-Terry Stop


-Terry Pat Down(Person)(M/V)


-Plain feel


-Exigent circumstances


-Plain view


-Emergency doctrine


-Search incident to arrest(M/V)


-Consent(M/V)


-M/V exception (Carrol Doc)


-Investigative search of M/V


-Protective sweep

Exclusionary Rule

Arisen out of Mapp V. Ohio


-Evidence obtained in a way that violates a persons constitutional protections will not be admissable at trial

Arrest

To deprive a person of his liberty under real or assured authority for the purpose of having the person answer to a criminal charge


4 elements:


1. Actual/constructive detention or seizure


2. Performed w/ intent to make an arrest


3. So understood by the suspect


4. W/ use of force by officer or submission by suspect

Burden Of Proof

The duty to affirmatively prove a fact


-Criminal: proof beyond a reasonable doubt


-Civil: perponderance of evidence 51%

Protective Sweep

-While lawfully in home


-R.A.S. area posesses a danger to the officer(s)


-Looking for people


-Can only look where people can hide

Plain Feel Doctrine

-Valid stop


-During lawful terry pat-down


-Officer feels object who's contour/mass


-Immediaely apparent


-Contraband= officer can seize it

Terry Pat Down (Person)

-Valid stop


-R.A.S.


-Armed/Dangerous


-Outergarments only


-Weapons only

Search Incident To An Arrest (Motor Vehicle)

-Must have custodial arrest


-Arestee must remain on scene


-In reach of vehicle(don't have to expect to find anything OR if search for evidence pertaining to custodial arrest, must expect to.)


-Can search passenger compartment


-Open closed containers


-Connot open/force open locked containers

Terry Stop

-R.A.S. criminal activity is afoot


-Brief Detention


-Confirm/Dispel


-Can be as intense as needed


*Can not transport terry suspect

Search Incident To An Arrest (Person)

-Person


-Immediate control/wingspan of person


-Can search clothing/items/containers


-Don't have to expect to find anything


-must have a custodial arrest


-custodial arrest + transport to booking

Arson Search

-Put out fire


-Enter to find origin of fire


-If taking a while, administrative warrant is needed to continue


-If turns criminal, stop, get search warrant

Inventory (Motor Vehicle)

-Tow Vehicle


-Follow Dept. Policy/Procedure


-Policy should address open/closed/locked containers. If not, be reasonable

Carroll Doctrine (Motor Vehicle Exception)

-Car must be in public place


-M/V = mobile


-Must remain on scene, can't tow


-Must have P.C. to believe vehicle contains evidence pertaining to crime


-Can only look where evidence can fit


- Once evidence is found, search is over


-More general, more areas you can look

Crime Scene (Search)

Step in shoes of initial officer, photo sketch - collect - plain view

Emergency Doctrine(Community Caretaker Function)

-Non Criminal


-Medical Aid


-Someone needs assistance

Search Incident To Arrest (Home)

-Custodial Arrest


-Person


-Wingspan

Hot Pursuit (Home)

-Arrest was set in motion in public place


-4th amendment not require delay


-Gravely endanger lives of others

Chimel Doctrine (Wingspan Search)

-Allows an officer to search an arrested party and the area within the arrested's immediate reach for weapons, contraband, and/or evidence which the accused could use against the officer or destroy

Consent

Whether or not a party voluntarily consents to a search is a matter of fact to be determined by the court based on the totality of circumstances




-A party will be found to have given consent when he/she voluntarily + knowingly agress to the search

Crime

An offense which is a felony or a misdemeanor

Execution of Search Warrants

1st--------------------------->10th day


-Knock


-Announce-(Who/Authority)(What/Purpose)


Wait (Reasonable Amount of Time)


Enter- Peaceful/Forceful

Method Of Entry

-Invitation


-Open to public

Anticipatory Warrant

Must have a triggered event

Aguilar/Spinelli Test (Informants)

-Informants


-Creadibilty- Why should i believe him


-Relibilty-how did they CFINF come to know this info


-Totality of circumstances test

Search Warrants

P/C /Detail / Particular


Follow the 4th

Execution of Search Warrants

-CGS 54-33


-10 day

Knock & Announce

Authority & Purpose

Other method of entry

Invitation


Businesses

First Time Informant

-Corroboration


-More Work

Citizen Witness

-More veracity then C.I.


-Totality of Circumstances

Nexus*

-Make Connection


-Important

Staleness

Of Search Warrant and Info

Franks Hearing

-

Miranda Warning*

Custody/Interogation


-Deprived in a significant way


-Not terry/not MV


-looks more like an arrest


Custodial/Question


Waive Miranda


-free w/o police coericion


-voluntary


-they understand



Reliabilty

How did the informant come to know this info?

Credibility

Why do we believe him? (Did he make statements against his own personal interest?)

Custody

deprived in a significant way

5th Amendment (Remain Silent)

At Arrest/Stop Questioning


not crime specific

5th Amendment (Right to Counsel)

At Arrest/Stop Questioning


not crime specific

6th Amendment (Right to Counsel)

In Court at first appearance


is crime specific


what crime they did before


judge is crime(s) can not talk

Public Safety Exception

14 day rule