S

Front 1

Acronym

Back 1

Information

Front 2

PRIC

Back 2

Jacob & Hartshorne, 2006: 4 ethical concepts: persons, respect, integrity, caring

Front 3

PLEGRAD, CEM

Back 3

Keith Speigel & Koocher, 1985: ethical decision-making model.

Front 4

CREEP (and I creep, yeaaaaaaaaaaah)

Back 4

Jacob & Hartshorne, 2006: supervisor responsibilities: competency, respect for and understanding of individual and cultural differences, ethical sensitivity & decision making behavior, emotional awareness and personal functioning

Front 5

BGR King, KT

Back 5

Anxiety genetic theory citations: Bogels & Siqueland, 2006; Ginsberg et al., 1995; Rapee & Spence, 2004; King & Ollendick, 1997; Kendler et al., 1992; Thapar & McGuffin, 1995

Front 6

WWHARPIPD? (What would Harpid do?)

Back 6

McCullough, 1990: questions for treatment acceptability: will the intervention work? How long do we have to wait for results? What will happen if we don’t do the intervention? How will people be affected? Do we have the necessary resources? are the implementers competent? Will the intervention lead to permanent change? How disruptive is the intervention?

Front 7

BFIJRD (Bravo Fox is just really dumb)

Back 7

APA ethical principles (2002): beneficence and non-maleficence, fidelity (trust), integrity, justice (everyone deserves the same), respect for dignity of persons

Front 8

SKAG

Back 8

Pfiffner & McBurnett, 2004: awareness of verbal and nonverbal social cues, focus on increasing skills and knowledge deficits, adaptive responding, geeneralization

Front 9

TICK

Back 9

Supervision skills. Katz (1955): technical, interpersonal, conceptual

Front 10

DIPT DEES

Back 10

Bluepring III; Ysseldyke et al., 2006 competencies: diversity, interpersonal communication & collaboration, professional, legal, ethical, moral responsibility, technological advances // data-based decision making, enhance cognitive/academic achievement for all students, enhance mental health for all students, systems-based service delivery

Front 11

ARTIC

Back 11

Fagan & Wise, 2000: roles of the school psychologist: assessment, research, teaching, intervention, consultation

Front 12

SMSADM (so many suicide attempts depress me )

Back 12

Illinois social-emotional learning standards; ISBE, 2005: 1. develop self-awareness and self-management skills to succeed in both the school and external environment 2. develop social awareness skills to enhance relationships 3. develop decision-making skills

Front 13

PECCS

Back 13

Holloway, 1995: supervision tasks: professional role, emotional awareness, counseling skills, case conceptualization, self-awareness

Front 14

MIMCS

Back 14

Holloway, 1995: supervision functions: monitoring/evaluating, instructing/advising, modeling, consulting, and supporting/sharing

Front 15

PLANZ, Dude.

Back 15

6 tenants of IDEIA: parent/child participation, LRE, appropriate education for all, non-discriminatory evaluation, zero-reject (i.e., child find), procedural due process.

Front 16

KVC

Back 16

Informed consent is knowing, competent, and voluntary; Hatch Amendment of 1994

Front 17

PRICC

Back 17

Salmon & Bryant (2002): ways to help a child resolve trauma: prevent forgetting, help child regulate emotions,

Front 18

WED, mon

Back 18

Haynes et al., 2003: goals of supervision. Protect welfare of client, encourage supervisee empowerment, promote supervisee growth and development, monitoring

Front 19

SHADY

Back 19

Academic classroom interventions with support, as reported in DuPaul, 2007: self-regulated strategy for written expression (Reid & Lieneman, 2006), homework support (Power et al., 2001); computer assisted instruction for mathematics (Clarkfield & Stoner, 2005), directed note-taking (Evans et al., 1995), (youth) classwide peer tutoring (DuPaul et al., 1998)

Front 20

P2VWRT

Back 20

Stimulant medication citations: Pelham et al., 2002; Pelham et al., 1998; Volpe et al., 2005; Whalen et al., 2002; Rapport et al., 2001; Thiruchelvam et al., 2001

Front 21

PIC

Back 21

Landau et al., 1998: peer coaching, impressions, classroom teachers (create an event to change perceptions)

Front 22

It’s as EASY as PIE… and SGR to enhance.

Back 22

Telzrow & Beebe, 2002: treatment integrity and fidelity: to enhance: ease of implementation, positive, matches the intervention context, perceived effectiveness. To enhance: scripts, guided practice/feedback, repeated treatment integrity checks

Front 23

CARDS

Back 23

Hindshaw, 2006: Mediators of long-term ADHD outcomes: cognitive changes, attendance at treatment, relationship with therapist, dose received, changes in family discipline style.

Front 24

PPP-H

Back 24

Other mediators for ADHD:

Front 25

PR CBG, HEB

Back 25

Coping with Depression Course for Adolescents (Clarke et al., 1990): problem-solving, relaxation, cognitive strategies, behavior interventions, generalization, homework, affective education, booster sessions didn’t prevent reoccurrence but made it significantly less distressing

Front 26

APCC, yeah you know me.

Back 26

ACTION treatment (Stark & Kendall, 1996; Kendall et al., 2005) components: affective education, problem-solving, coping skills training, cognitive skills restructuring

Front 27

Change, don’t FRET

Back 27

ACTION treatment (Stark & Kendall, 1996; Kendall et al., 2005) coping skills: change your thoughts about the situation, do something fun, do something relaxing, do something to exert energy, or talk about it with someone

Front 28

PSC-PER

Back 28

CBT components

Front 29

SR + DT = 4eva! (Sarah Reck + Derrick Turnbow)

Back 29

Self monitoring (DuPaul et al., 2002); response/cost (Carlson & Tamm, 2000); DRC (Pelham et al., 1998); time-out from positive reinforcement (DuPaul et al., 2002)

Front 30

PAS HUGS

Back 30

Webster-Stratton, 1992: Dinosaur Years. CBT intervention involving problem solving, anger management, and social skillz through use of homework, use of puppets, group discussions about short videotaped vignettes

Front 31

FUCMV

Back 31

Easy one… 5 ethical considerations for assessment according to Jacob & Hartshorne, 2006: fair, useful, comprehensive, multifaceted, and valid

Front 32

DRs are PRICs

Back 32

Fagan & Wise, 2000: doctoral level practitioners did more problem solving, research, direct intervention, and consultation

Front 33

EIARSIET (ew, I am really slow in evaluating TBI)

Back 33

Brown et al., 2001: consultation stages: entry into organization, initiation of consultation relationship, assessment, something, intervention selection, intervention

Front 34

FACS

Back 34

NCLB’s 4 pillars (NCLB’s got the FACs…): more freedom for districts and states (can use money where they need it), greater accountability, more choices for parents (if school isn’t performing), scientifically-based instructional strategies (proven educational methods)

Front 35

WED, mon

Back 35

Haynes et al., 2003: Supervision goals: protect the welfare of the client, empower the supervisee to be more independent, encourage the supervisee’s growth and development, monitor the supervisee’s actions

Front 36

SAID

Back 36

Haynes et al., 2003: multicultural competencies:

Front 37

HATE

Back 37

Lowe, 2005: outcomes of the futures conference were this: home-school collaboration, action research, technology, empirically based treatments.

Front 38

DRCs

Back 38

Sugai & Horner, 1999: behavior change should be durable, relevant, comprehensive, & socially significant

Front 39

OK, UP!

Back 39

Lopez, 2000: steps to becoming more culturally competent. 1. awareness of own culture, 2. knowledge of other cultures, 3. utilize attained knowledge, 4. employ problem-models related to multicultural issues

Front 40

WEPT, /

Back 40

Nova model; Poland and colleagues, i.e., Poland et al., 2002: 1. where were you when the crisis occurred? 2. what was everyone’s sensory perceptions when the event occurred? 3. what were everyone’s thoughts when it occurred? 4. What are people worried about in the future? 5. What has helped people deal with similar things in the past?

Front 41

ICOPE

Back 41

Novins et al., 1997: DSM cultural considerations.

Front 42

SPSS

Back 42

Protective factors—general: supportive family environment (Kliewe & Lewis, 1995), parents who are warm & supportive (Hetherington & Stanley-Hagan, 1999), & support system (i.e. friendships; Alvord & Grados, 2005).

Front 43

PLF

Back 43

Klein et al 2005: areas to focus on when assessing for depression. Psychosocial functioning, life stress, & family history of psychopathology

Front 44

SGR ID ID—FIRM.

Back 44

This is for IPT-A, which is Mufson et al., 1993; downward extension of the adult version. Assumes that depression is caused by a number of factors (bio, genetic, social) but that it is triggered by something in one of the domains. The domains are: single-parent families, grief, role transition, interpersonal deficits, interpersonal disputes. In therapy, we want to use the FIRM steps: we want to identify the problem area, relate depressive symptoms to the problem area, focus on current relationships, and help client manage the context of his or her depression.

Front 45

The PSC bites-R

Back 45

Mediators of depression: psychosocial and social capital mediate transactional influences between maternal & child depression (Elgar et al., 2004); disturbed cognitive processes mediate the relationship between stressful life events and depressive symptoms (Cole & Turner, 1993); biological (i.e., in utero) mechanisms mediate the relationship between maternal & child depression (Elgar et al., 2004); perceived rejection mediates the relationship between peer rejection and self-reported depression (Panak & Garber, 1992)

Front 46

PI UPDATE

Back 46

Central tenants of IDEA: IDEA Partnership, 2007: progress monitoring, early interventions, universal screenings, problem-solving, data-based decision making, accountability, tiered interventions, evidence-based interventions

Front 47

PPPs by Prus et al., 1995

Back 47

Pros of credentialing: protects the profession, protects welfare of clients with whom the school psychologist will work, makes sure professionals are prepared.

Front 48

ASS

Back 48

Moderators for depression: age (prior to age 14, rates are similar, but between 14 and 17, girls have a greater increase of diagnosis); sex (generally more effective for females; Weisz et al., 1995), SES (high SES could act as a moderating variable, allowing more access to resources, which then could act as a mediating variable with regard to long-term outcome).

Front 49

Gee, these kids with anxiety disorders sure are SOAPI…

Back 49

Protective factors by Donovan & Spence, 2000: risk factors are: stressful, negative traumatic life events, overprotective/critical parenting, anxious-resistant attachment, parental anxiety, behavioral inhibition (last one is Kagan & Snidman, 1991)

Front 50

PINED

Back 50

Beck et al.’s 1985 cognitive behavioral model of anxiety: Physiological arousal (link as a cue to start using coping statements), internal fearful dialogue that maintains anxiety, negative reinforcement is how anxiety is maintained, (negative thinking styles lead to fear development and maintenance of fear/anxiety by response to one’s environment; disturbed/deficient thoughts.

Front 51

SANCS

Back 51

To incorporate developmental theory into anxiety assessment: SANCS: stability and change in behavior, age differences in patterns of behaviors/symptoms, normative guidelines, attention to cognitive & social-emotional processes in selection of assessment measures

Front 52

HI KOVACS!

Back 52

Ways to do a non-biased assessment (Ortiz, 2002): H: developmental, family, school history; interpret findings in light of the child’s background; be knowledgeable about kid’s culture; observe the child in classroom ad other settings appropriate to problem; use a variety of formal and informal assessment measures; consider influence of culture ad degree of acculturation when selecting assessment strategies; maintain rapport in a culturally sensitive manner.

Front 53

OPTIC

Back 53

Kazdin & Wassel, 1999: treatment barriers: obstacles to session attendance; perceived ineffectiveness of treatment; low teacher morale; ineffective relationship with therapist; confusion about treatment goals. Perception of fewer barriers attenuated risk!!

Front 54

I love Twix in the afternoon.

Back 54

Your meta-acronym for supervision: t=TICK w= wed, mon, c= creep; s= said. TICK: Katz, 1955. the three cardinal skills of supervision are: technical, interpersonal and conceptual. WED, MON= Haynes et al., 2003: goals of supervision are to protect the welfare of the client, empower the supervisee, promote the growth and development of the supervisee; and monitor the supervisee. CREEP goals of supervision according to Jacob & Hartshorne, 2006: promote competency, respect for individual and cultural differences, ethical decision making behavior, emotional awareness and professional functioning. SAID = multicultural competencies according to Haynes et al., 2003: model cultural sensitivity, demonstrate and promote cultural awareness, use interventions that model these, and explore racial dynamics in supervision.