• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/32

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

32 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

Risk assessment

Composed of two components prediction and management


The prediction component: identifying risk factors related to likelihood of future violence


The management component: development of interventions to manage or reduce the likelihood of future violence. (Identifying treatments)

Risk assessment contexts (2)

Civil context


Criminal context

Civil -risk assessment

Private right of individual and the legal proceedings connected with these rights

Criminal -risk assessment

Situations in which an individual has been charged with a crime

5 Civil contexts require risk assessment

-Civil commitment- involuntary hospitalization


-Assessment of risk in child protection


-Immigration - ensuring they do pose a risk to safety, social, cultural or economic functioning


- School and labour regulations


-Duty to warn and limits of confidentiality

Criminal settings of risk assessment

Risk assessment occurs at every major decision point in the criminal justice and forensic psychiatric system


-Bail can be denied if they are danger to other or the communityy

Type of predictions outcomes (4)

True positive


True negative


False positive


False negative

True positive

A correct prediction that occurs when a person who is predicted to engage in some type of behaviour does so

True negative

A correct prediction that occurs when a person who is predicted not to engage in some type of behaviour does so

False postive

An incorrect prediction that occurs when a person who is predicted to engage in some type of behaviour but does not

Fals negactive

An incorrect prediction that occurs when a person who is predicted not to engage in some type of behaviour but does

Base rate

Represents the percentage of people within a given population who engage in a specific behaviour or have a mental disorder

Methodological issues (3 Weaknesses of research in prediction of violence)

-There are limited number of risk factors being studied


-Researcher often use official criminal records as their criterion measure but many crimes are not reported to the police


- Expanding the criterion variable to severity of violence, targets of violence and motivation versus instrumental

Illusory correlation

Belief that a correlation exists between two events that in reality are either not correlated or to a lesser degree

Approaches to assessment of risk (3)

Unstructured clinical judgement


Actuarial prediction


Structured professional judgement

Unstructured clinical judgement

Decisions characterized by a substantial amount of professional discretion and lack of guidelines

Actuarial prediction

Decisions are based on risk factors that are selected and combined based on empirical or statistical association with a specific outcome

Structured professional judgment

Decisions are guided by a predetermined list of risk factors that have been selected from the research and professional literature. Judgement of risk level is based on the evaluator's professional judgment

Types of risk factor predictors (2)

Static risk factor


Dynamic risk factor

Static risk factor (Historical risk factor)

Risk factor that does not fluctuate over time and is not changed by treatment


-Ex. Age of first arrest

Dynamic risk factor

Risk factors that fluctuate over time and are amenable to change

Important risk factors (5)

Static risk factor (Historical risk factor)


Dispositional risk factor


Clinical risk factors


Contextual risk factors


Situational risk factors


Dispositional risk factors (2)

Demographics: Offender arrested before 14 have more serious and more extensive criminal careers


Personality Characteristics: Impulsiveness (Not able to regulate behaviour) and psychopathy (Manipulativeness, lack of remorse, impulsivity)

Historical risk factor (Static risk factor) (3)

Past behaviour: Past violent behaviour and nonviolent behaviour are good predictors


Age of onset: Individual demonstrate antisocial behaviour at an earlier age are more chronic and serious offenders


Childhood history of maltreatment: Victims of physical abuse and neglect are more likely to commit crimes

Clinical factors (2)

Substance abuse: Drugs and alcohol are associated with criminal behaviour and violence. Drug users are in contact with antisocial people leading to violent confrontations


Mental disorder: Most people with mental disorder are not violent, however some disorders are linked to higher rates of violence


Threat/control override symptoms were strongly related to violence

Contextual risk factors

Support: Instrumental, emotional, appraisal and information (four kinds of support)


Access to weapons or victims: If an offender is released into environment and had easy access to weapons or victims then potential of violence increases

Risk-assessment instruments

Violence risk appraisal guide


HCR-20

Violence Risk Appraisal Guide (VRAG)

Designed to assess the long-term risk for violent recidivism in offender with mental disorder


Coded 50 risk factors


Predictors: Hare Psychopathy Checklist-Revised score


-Elementary school maladjustment


-Diagnosis of any personality disorder

HCR-20

Designed to predict violent behaviour in correctional and forensic psychiatric samples


List 20 items organized into 3 main scales


-Historical


-Clinical


-Risk management

Female offenders

Women engage in less criminal behaviour than men- besides prostitution and lower recidivism rates


Married is risk factor women


LSI-R instrument for female offenders


More research needs to be conducted on female offenders


Protective factors

Factors that mitigate or reduce likelihood of negative outcome


-Prosocial involvement


-Strong social support


-Strong attachments


-Intelligenc

Desistance

The processing of ceasing to engage in criminal behaviour