• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/20

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

20 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

Extraneous variable

A variable other than the IV that could cause changes in the value of the DV

Confounding variable

A variable other than the IC that has a systematic effect on the value of the DV (acting as a second, unwanted IV)


- No valid conclusions can be made

Convenience sampling

Participants are chosen for the sample as they are readily available


- Normally unable to represent a population


- Biased, research findings are unreliable

Random sampling

A procedure in which every member of the population has an equal chance of being selected.

Stratified sampling

Processes by which the effects of a certain variable is eliminated as a possible confound in an experiment.

Random allocation

All participants who have been selected for an experiment have an equal change of being in the E-group or C-group

Repeated measures design



Each participant is part of both E-group and C-group.



Advs & Disadvs of Repeated measures design

Adv:


-Confounds caused by participant variables are eliminated


Disadv:


- Time consuming


- Order effects (practice, boredom)


^ To fix this: time between two experiments, counter-balancing

Matched participants design

Enables a researcher to identify a potential confounding variable and eliminate it's effects on the experiment.


- Using different, but similar participants

Advs & Disadvs of Matched participants design

Adv:


- Matched participants will not influence results bc effects will be same in E and C group


Disadv:


- Time-consuming


- Expensive

Independent groups design

Allocates participants to E and C group at random

Advs & Disadvs of Independent groups design

Adv:


- Quick, drop-outs are unlikely


Disadv:


- Large sample is needed

Placebo

An object or procedure that is expected to have no effect on the value of the DV


- Administered to the C group to provide a basis for comparison with the E group.

Placebo effect

Refers to a participants behaviour being influenced by their expectations of how they should behave


- Caused by belief they have received treatment


- May affect the value of the DV




- Eliminated using single-blind procedure

Single-blind procedure

Used to eliminate the placebo effect


- Allocates participants in a way so they do not know whether they are in the E or C group

Experimenter effect

Refers to the outcome of an experiment being unintentionally influenced by the experimenter.


- EG: if the experimenter treats the members of the E and C group differently




- Eliminated using the double-blind procedure



Double-blind procedure

Ensures that neither the experimenter nor the participants are aware of which participants are in E-group or C-group

Conclusion

- Restate p-value


- Whether it is statistically significant


- What that means


- Hypothesis is supported/rejected


- What that means

Generalisation

A judgment about the extent to which research findings can be applied to the population represented by the sample.


- Sample must represent population


- Results must be statistically signif.


- Effects of all potential confounding variables are controlled.

Ethical considerations


(List 5 & explain)

- Role of the experimenter


- Participants rights:


- Confidentiality


- Voluntary participation


- Withdrawal rights


- Informed consent


- Deception


- Debriefing