Quals: Ethics

Front 1

APA ethics code general principles

Back 1

Beneficence and nonmaleficence, fidelity and responsibility, integrity, justice, respoect for people's rights and dignity (APA, 2002)

Front 2

Beneficence and nonmaleficence

Back 2

Benefit those with whom they work, do no harm (APA, 2002)

Front 3

Fidelity and responsibility

Back 3

Establish relationships of trust (APA, 2002)

Front 4

Integrity

Back 4

Promote accuracy, honesty, and truthfulness (APA, 2002)

Front 5

Justice

Back 5

Entitle all persons access to and benefit from contributions of psychology (APA, 2002)

Front 6

Respect for people’s rights and dignity

Back 6

Respect the dignity and worth of all people, and the rights of individuals to privacy, confidentiality, and self- determination (APA, 2002)

Front 7

Belmont report basic principles

Back 7

Respect for persons, beneficence, justice

Front 8

Coercion

Back 8

Overt threat of harm intentionally presented to obtain compliance (Belmont report)

Front 9

Undue influence

Back 9

Offer of excessive, unwarranted, inappropriate or improper reward to obtain compliance (Belmont report)

Front 10

Value neutral

Back 10

The interventionist starts with the assumption that he or she has certain values, but attempts are made to keep these from interfering in the intervention process. (Snow et al., 2000)

Front 11

Value advocate

Back 11

A clear value orientation is adopted and efforts are made to reduce the options acceptable to the recipient (Snow et al., 2000)

Front 12

Ethics in community psych cite

Back 12

Snow et al., 2000

Front 13

Responsible to whom? Responsible for what?

Back 13

O'Neil, 1989

Front 14

Case studies in ethics in community psych cite

Back 14

O'Neil, 1989

Front 15

2 solutions to tension between client and society cite

Back 15

Do what client wants, serve interests of vulnerable (O'Neil, 1989)

Front 16

IRB history cite

Back 16

Edgar & Rothman, 1995

Front 17

Central charges of IRB

Back 17

Review whether benefits outweigh risks, make sure investigators have explained all relevant issues to secure informed consent (Edgar & Rothman, 1995)

Front 18

The author makes a call to redefine ethical dilemmas through consideration of context

Back 18

Bond, 1989

Front 19

the authors discussed issues particular to privileging the views and experiences of particular racial groups who are all considered poor or working class.

Back 19

Fine et al., 2000

Front 20

emphasized the importance of reporting the mundane. Pointed out that most of the time, more sensational or interesting narratives are reported, which can contribute to a distored view of the populations studied.

Back 20

Fine et al., 2000

Front 21

Ethical practice model cite

Back 21

Fisher, 2008

Front 22

First focus on the clinical considerations and let the legal questions follow from the clinical assessment. After assessing the client’s best interests, the psychologist should place the clinical determination in the context of legal obligations.

Back 22

Behnke, 2007

Front 23

Duty to warn cite

Back 23

Tarasoff, 1976

Front 24

Risk assessment and management

Back 24

Monahan, 1993

Front 25

It appears that therapists’ ability to predict and prevent violence- not the context in which it occurs, will determine whether a relationship is “special

Back 25

Applebaum and Rosenbaum (1989)

Front 26

Duty to warn arises when 1) a client communicates 2) a serious threat 3) of physical violence 4) against a reasonably identifiable victim.

Back 26

Cohen (tarasoff application in Illinois)

Front 27

Current abuse must be reported, but abuse that is decades old and the perp is dead is not mandated to report. There is a gray area between if the client reports abuse that is many years old.

Back 27

Behnke and Kinscherff (2002)

Front 28

Reporting abuse against client’s wishes my be more devastating than the abuse. Act in a way that enhances the benefits to the client.

Back 28

Koocher et al (2002)

Front 29

Dual relationships aren’t always unethical. It is only unethical if they can be expected to impair psychologists objectivity, competence, or effectiveness, or if it is exploitative.

Back 29

Behnke (2004)

Front 30

Sexual relationship puts client at risk for harm.

Back 30

Behnke (2006)

Front 31

Role confusion a problem in rural areas b/c of lack of resources. Characteristics of rural communities make them vulnerable to dual relationships.

Back 31

Campbell and Gordon (2003)

Front 32

Recommends: Imagine the worst case scenario before entering into a relationship, consult, maintain clear boundaries, confidentiality, terminate the relationship as soon as it becomes unethical.

Back 32

Campbell and Gordon (2003)

Front 33

Warning signs of boundary conflicts

Back 33

Hass and Malouf (1989)

Front 34

Standard that prohibits sexual relations for 2 years after the end of tx gives priority to non maleficence and leaves room for client to exercise autonomy.

Back 34

Behnke (2004)

Front 35

Substance abusers are not listed in the category of “vulnerable” populations. The authors discussed how they minimized coercion in their research

Back 35

McCrady and Bux (1999)

Front 36

Research ethics with ethnic minority children and youth

Back 36

Fisher et al. (2002)

Front 37

How to handle subpeonas and court orders for client records/test data

Back 37

APA (2006)