Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
39 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
Core Value- Outline 1
|
Primacy of the Famliy; the family as an agent to provide
|
|
Types of Capital
|
Economic
Social Personal |
|
Economic Capital
|
Food, healthcare, housing, money, clothing, education (to some extent)
|
|
Median Household Income
|
$52,000
|
|
Federal Poverty Line
|
$20,000 family of four
$16,600 family of three $13,00 family of two |
|
Core Values- Outline 2
|
Work as a virtue
Autonomy of the individual Income equity Balancing productivity and compensation |
|
Income Distribution in the United States-
HIstorical shifts |
1947-1970: gap between poor and rich narrows due to the creation of SS, Welfare, min. wage, full employment, unions
1970- present: gap between poor and rich widening 2003-2004: top 1% of earners gained 17% while the other 99% went up 3% |
|
Income Distribution in the U.S.
Shifts in Congruence Between Productivity and Income |
Product output per worker has increased, but workers have seen little change in pay; the minimum wage hasn't changed since 1997 and therefore hasn't kept up with inflation; the U.S. is more concerned with curbing inflation than reaching full employment; shift from manufacturing to service jobs
|
|
Influences on Income Distribution
|
Taxes, minimum wage, tax deductions (EITC, children, charitable donations, losses from stock speculation, interest on house mortgage) death tax
|
|
Remedies for Inequity
|
TANF, SS, SSI, ETIC, food stamps
|
|
U.S. Official Poverty Line- Historical Development
|
Molly Orshanky, a worker of the Department of Agriculture, determined at below what amount she thought a family would not be able to live; she arrived at this figure by speculating the cost of food and multiplying it by 3 because she figured food represented a third of a family's budget
|
|
Number and Percentage of Children in the United States Below the Poverty Line
|
17% or 12 million
|
|
Changes in Child Poverty Over Time
|
Child poverty has increased since 2000 after nearly a decade of decline.
|
|
Variations in Child Poverty by State, Ethnicity and Race, and Child Age
|
D.C. is the worst with 30%; New Hampshire has the least with 7%; South is disproportionately poor; of top 10 extreme poverty states, it has 7 of them
Whites have the greatest number of poor, but blacks and latinos are disproportionately poor Child Age- young children are disproportionately poor; 46% of children under six live in poverty |
|
Notion of Near Poor
|
Twice the poverty line
$40,000 family of four $33,200 family of three $26,400 family of four |
|
Number and Percentage of Near-Poor Children in U.S.
|
40% of children, 29 million
|
|
Poor Families- Reasons for Poverty
|
Parental Employment- 55% have at least one parent working full-time, year round; 19% have no parent working
Parental Education- 61% of poor parents have a high school diploma or less Family Structure- |
|
Governmental/Social Policies: Incentives and Disincentives to Work
|
EITC
Child care subsidies Minimum wage- hasn't risen since 1997 TANF- Temporary Aid for Needy Families; provides monetary assistance for a limited time; parent has to be going to school or working; validity of program based on how the families are doing later in terms of self-suffiicency |
|
PRWORA
|
required states to crackdown on fathers who did not make child support payments; states set "inadequacy levels"
|
|
Adult self sufficiency
|
7% if adults are not self-sufficient; 10% of them would be self-sufficientif they did not have children
|
|
Reasons for Decreasing Self-Sufficiency
|
Macro-Economic Forces- min. wage, lack of jobs, tax policy, service economy, outsourcing/globalization)
Demographic Forces- Women moving into the workforce, amount of young people seeking jobs, number of job seekers relative to number of jobs available Personal Capital- education, skills, work history |
|
Personal Capital
|
education, skills, work history, race, ethnicity- all influence job and potential earnings
|
|
Demographic Forces
|
Women moving into the workforce, amount of young people seeking jobs, number of job seekers relative to number of jobs available
|
|
Macro-Economic Forces
|
min. wage, lack of jobs, tax policy, service economy, outsourcing/globalization)
|
|
Why are there more poor children than poor adults?
|
Children and not distributed evenly
Age of parents at child bearing and child rearing- young workers with lower incomes have less working experience and earning potential Single parenting- 55% divorced, 30% never married; 15% other Lower income individuals have more children; poor families avg. 1.6 children; non-poor families average .9 Child bearing and child rearing choices (timing and number) personal choices about birth control, abstinence, kids as income sources, availability of birth control Social/Governmental policies and cultural mores- sex ed., abstinence, availability of birth control |
|
Child bearing and child rearing choices (timing and number)
|
personal choices about birth control, abstinence, kids as income sources, availability of birth control
|
|
Avg. no of children poor v. nonpoor
|
Lower income individuals have more children; poor families avg. 1.6 children; non-poor families average .9
|
|
Reasons for single parenting by percentage
|
55% divorced, 30% never married; 15% other
|
|
Young people, children, and earnings
|
young workers with lower incomes have less working experience and earning potential
|
|
Social/Government policies and cultural mores
|
sex ed., abstinence, availability of birth control
|
|
Problems with the Current Definitions of Poverty
|
Is absolute rather than relativistic
Does not include cash-transfers Does not include child care costs Does not take into account cost of insurance Does not take into account geographic variation cost of living |
|
Single v. Two-Parent Households and Poverty
|
55.7% of poor families are single-parent households; just 13.9% of nonpoor families with children have only one adult
|
|
"The Squeeze"
|
moms working more, supposedly spending more time with their children
|
|
Changes in Household Chores
|
Moms are doing about half as much work as they did in 1965; men are doing twice as much housework as they did in 1965; altogether, number of hours per week done by anyone in households has dropped from 36.5 hours to 28 hours
|
|
Changes in Childcare Within Families
|
Father today are spending about one more hour with their children than fathers in 1965 did; moms are spending slightly more time with their children today than in 1965.
|
|
Amount of People Working Non-Standard Hours
|
Working non-standard hours
Single Earner, child less than 5: 30% Single Earner,child less than 14: 25% Two Earners, child less than 5: 31% Two Earners, child less than 14: 24.7% Trends: two earner households work more non-standard shifts; parents with young children work more non-standard shifts |
|
Health Consequences of Non-Standard Hours
|
Circadian rhythms thrown off affecting hormones, body temperature, sleep cycle; increased risk of cardiovascular disease, gastrointestinal disorders, and preterm or low-weight births
|
|
Effects of Non-Standard Work Hours on Marital Relationships
|
Greater conflict, less quality time together, divorce rate 6x higher amoung couples who have been married less than 5 years and the father works non-standard hours
|
|
Effects of Non-Standard Work Hours on Children
|
Increased parental stress; increased family conflict; poorer relationships with children; *can't eat dinner as a family
|