Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
5 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
Essay 5: FAILURE TO FORM ATTACHMENT Outline and evaluate research into the effects o failure to form attachment (12 marks) A01 -1-3
|
1. Tizard & Hodges (1989)- AIM: R through natural exp LT effects of emotional privation= placing 65 infants in 1 institution b4 4 months.
2. Procedure= children bought up in children’s home until =4 yrs = unabl2 form A2any oadults as staff at home =Xallowed2formA with kids 2stop them= upset if staff left their job. By age of 4, 33 of 65 children = adopted, 25 = restored2 biological rents &7left remained in the home. 3. Kids=visited at8yrs & interviewed 16 yrs with a key adult present. Age 16, R asked permission2 interview their teachers & peers. |
|
Essay 5: FAILURE TO FORM ATTACHMENT Outline and evaluate research into the effects o failure to form attachment (12 marks) A01 -4-6 |
4.Findings= restored kids= less likely 2 have formed closeA with rents que adopted kids who =as closelyA2 their rents = control group of kids. 5. All kids initially raised in institution = prob forming Rship with peers =less likely2 haveBFF &^quarrelsome =^likely2 be bullies. 6. Suggest: early privation= permanent –ive effect on Rship where effort = required from kid EG. Avec m8s even when sub emot care=provided. |
|
POINT1(Limitation): R in2 priv ignores individ diff cos… Many studies found kids= recover from effects of early priv EXP: Idea= supp: Rutter(2007) R effects of institutionalisation on RomanianOrphans& F: many infants who= adopted byBritish fam b4= 6 months exp NO LT effects. |
HOWEV: RutterF: effects of early priv… =^ damaging 4 kids adopted after 6 months –^=disinhabitedA & = prob==lasting Rship withm8 THERE4: sugg..Severity damage from early priv=determined by child’s age when removed from priv & qualitysubsequent care. LB: ^studies: Koluchova(1972) Czench twins=… Effects of priv = reversed if infant =placed in <3ing& supp env& given opp 2 form anA with an adult who responds sensitively2 needs.
|
|
POINT 2 (Limitation 2): Value of R findings undermined due 2 the use of… EXP: Natur exp2invest effects of early priv, R=no control over env kids= subsequently raised. |
FURTHER^: =V. problematic Tizard &Hodges (1989) R cos diff behav adopted& restored kids= be attributed2 kids temp rather que quality of care = exp Y kids= chosen 2b adopted 1stly. THERE4: = exp Y Adopted kids=closer A with fam que restored kids still fails 2explain Y kids=hard2 =lasting peer Rship. LB: In +addition use of longitudinalR= often not poss 4 R2 contact large enough group of the kids in l8er life cos some pp may have dropped out over time (attrition).
|
|
POINT 3 (Limitation 3): Long term effects of privation unknown because…EXP: R= cond over long period of time- extent 2 which effects extend in2 adulthood = often??? |
ELAB: =PROB COS… may=^que 10 yrs 4 effects of priv 2 disappear as kids raised in institution rather que raised by adopted rents may=longer2 learn 2 cope with Rships BUT not necessarily= never recover. HOWEV: Howev idea ex-institutional kids can completely recover opp by Quinton (1984)… found: high prop of kids whose mothers = raised in kids homes spent time in care 2. |
