• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/13

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

13 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

Two defining features of single-subject designs:

The behavior of each participant is observed before and after treatment.


Repeated observations are made until the behavior is judged stable.

large-group designs.

Typically 40-200 individuals are randomly assigned to a treatment or control group.Obviously, those in the treatment group get treatment (something thought to improve behavior) and those in the control group don’t get the treatment.

Why don’t applied behavior analysts use large-group research designs?

Reason #1: Because they are interested in the behavior of individuals.


Reason #2: To use a large-group designs, you need a large number of individuals with the same diagnosis.


Reason #3: People don’t want to be assigned to the control group.


Reason #4: Inferential statistics are a useful set of tools, but study after study has shown that psychologists (even those who publish their work in the most prestigious journals) are not very good statisticians


Reason #5: Single-subject designs encourage the researcher to present their individual data graphically and let the consumer decide if it was successful.

internal validity

Internal validity: Assuming that behavior changed after the intervention, if we can say that the intervention caused the behavior change, then the experiment has internal validity.

3 main single subject design:

Comparison Design (A-B design)


Reversal Design (A-B-A design)


Internal validity may be establishedMultiple-Baseline


DesignInternal validity may be established

#Step 1: Get some baseline data.

Rule #1: Do not introduce the treatment if behavior is improving.


Rule #2: If behavior is getting worse, then you should introduce the treatment.


Rule #3: Attempt to minimize “bounce” (i.e., between-session variability) before introducing the treatment.

#Step 2: Get some treatment data

Rule #1: Better to have too much treatment data than to not have enough.Learning takes time, so be patient before giving up on the treatment.If the treatment works, you will need to convince a skeptical audience that it has lasting effects on behavior

#Step 3:

Look for convincing evidence of a treatment effect.

Step 1: Are the final three observations in the baseline & treatment conditions divided?

(If the behavior is not divided, you are done – you don’t have a convincing behavior change.)

Step 2: Are the data in the baseline and treatment phases stable?

A stable baseline suggests that if we do nothing, behavior will not change.Stable treatment data suggest that the behavior will remain like this as long as treatment remains in place.

Step 3: If the baseline and treatment phases are not stable, this may not be a problem.

It depends on the direction in which the data are trending.

Step 4:

Did the experimenter use a design that has internal validity.

Which of the single-subject designs have good internal validity?

Reversal


Multiple Baseline


NOT Comparison