• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/64

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

64 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
attribution
process by which we explain a persons behavior
attribution
process by which we explain a persons behavior
correspondent inference theory
people learn about each other from unexpected, free behavior.
mind perception
attributing human-like mental states to others
you can tell that a person is lying by their
voice and body, but more body than voice
three factors in corespondant inference theory
choice, expectedness and outcome
covariation theory
in order for something to be the cause of a behavior then it msut be present when the behavior ocurs and not when it is not occuring
fundamental attribution error
overestimate personal factors and underestimate situaional factors
base rate fallacy
people ignore base rate statistics and put more weight in things that are dramatic. like plane crashes and winning the lottery. even though the chances are low to win the lottery, people still do it because other people have
primacy/recency effects
primacy- things listed first are what matter more

recency-things that are said more recently and last are remembered
counterfactual thinking
what might have been
false consensus effect
overestimate how much people will agree with you
availability heuristic
tendency to overestimate how often something will occur based on how easily it will come to mind
negativity bias
cannot see past a negative trait no matter their other good qualities
belief perseverance
first impressions last
implicit personality theory
one trait implies another
correspondant inference theory
does this action imply their personalilty? does it go with it?
black people are/are not more likely to get shot than white people
are not
benevolent sexism
chivalry because women need protection
illusory correlation
the illusion that traits are more correlated then they really are
relative deprivation
that they fare worse than others by comparison
gender stereotypes are
prescriptive rather than descriptive as in they say what a woman/man should be instead of saying what they actually are.
confirmational bias
changing information/how you interpret information so that it suites what you want it to prove/be
outgroup homogeny effect
outgroups are all the same/ engineer example
predjudice
affective; feelings towards individuals based on their group association
stereotyping
cognitive. impressions
discrimination
behavioral. altered behavior
halo effect
if someone has good qualities people assume they have all good qualities
the sleeper effect
people forget the source but not the message as time progresses, therefore, losing credibility
impression management
people want to leave a constant impression on others, even if they are faking it
psychological reactance
when someone tries to change our beliefs we react
insufficiant deterance
mild punishment (as opposed to severe punishment) WORKS
central route to persuasion
when people think critically about facts and contents of the message
IAT
measures unconcious attitudes
credible communicators posses
competancy and trustworthyness
bogus pipeline
fake lie detector test
inocculation hypothesis
knowing what to expect before entering a situation so that you can come up with arguments and you already have judgements made. like a shot. you get a shot so your body knows what to do.
is it rare for one person to go against the rest?
yes
conformity in asch:
norm/public
autokinetic effect
staitionary pt of light
chameleon effect
people mimic others without knowing.
digital mimicing as well
3 factors that influence if a soceity will be individualistic or collectivisitic:
complexity, affluence, heterogeny
males are more/less likely to conform in public
true
social impact theory
strength, immediacy and number
door in face
big request then small one
lowballing
stating a low offer but then saying 'oh you need this too' and raisng the price
thats not all
begins with an inflated requestn bt then is reduced with an offer or discount
the norm of reciprocity
repaying + extra
conformity
tendency to change our beliefes along with the group
cognitive heuristics
rules of thumb that allow us to make quick judgements which are usuually fll of error
fundamental attribution error
tend to overestimate personal factors and underestimate situationl factors
we dont tke into account their predicimate
information integration theory
impressions are based on perciever predispositions and a weighted average of traits
optimal distinctiveness theory
people try to balance the desire to be distinct with the desire to belong

to obtain a desired level of belongness and distintiveness
realistic conflict theory
direct competition for resources creates prejudice
social categories
energy saving process that allows people to quickly group people (often with error)
attitudes do/do not always correlate with behavior
do not, but have strong corrleation
attitudes predict behavior when they are strong/weak and specific/general?
attitudes predict behavior when they are strong and specific
lengthy messages are persuasive to central/perephreal?
perephreal
moderatly discrepent messages inspire change/do not inspire change

very different messages inspire/do not inspire chnge
mildly different inspires change
subliminl messages actually do
not work
self monitoring aims to
get the best social image
four conditions for cognitive dissonace to be aroused
feeling of wrong doing
personal responsibility
sherif
private conformity
asch
public conformity