• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/13

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

13 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
Conclusion from Chase and Simon (chess)
Chess masters
Superior memory limited to real chess positions.
They do not have better memory in general.

Expertise allows chunking of board positions.

Experts have organized knowledge. Reflects deep understanding.
Expert vs. Novices (6 things)
Rich, organized schemas
Lots of well-organized declarative and procedural knowledge
More sophisticated representations

Spend more time on representation
experts take longer to analyze problem and start solution, but less time to complete it

Recognize subcomponents

Less Means-End analysis
pre-stored solutions in long term memory
fewer demands on working memory

Move forward, not backward

Experts often no better than novices on problems outside their area of expertise
Can be worse
Talent view
Innate (inherited) abilities limit the ultimate level of performance one can attain
Deliberate practice is necessary but not sufficient
Deliberate practice view
“Practicing more intensively than others is probably the most reasonable explanation we have today, not only of success in any line, but even for genius” (John Watson, 1930)
Deliberate practice is necessary and sufficient
Deliberate practice perspective
Ericsson
“we reject any important role for innate ability” (Ericsson et al., 1993)

Evidence for innate talent (“giftedness”) is thin.

Differences in deliberate practice account for differing levels of achievement among experts.
What is deliberate practice
Focused
Guided by conscious performance monitoring
Identification of errors
Appropriate, immediate feedback (teachers or self-generated)
Set new, specific goals that go beyond current performance
Elite figure skaters spend more time on challenging jumps than less-elite counterparts. Failed more. (Deakin and Cobley, 2003)
Don’t settle for comfortable level of automaticity.
Don't settle
Rather than automaticity at a level that is just ok, stay in cognitive/associative stages
Conclusion of study of violinists
Conclusion: Difference between good and exceptional musicians can be accounted for by the amount of practice

Not just playing, but motivated
practice with repetition and
feedback
10,000 hour rule
10,000 hour rule: It takes 10,000 hours of deliberate practice to achieve world-class mastery.
(roughly 3 hours per day for 10 years)

In any field: composers, basketball players, fiction writers, ice skaters, concert pianists, chess players, master criminals (Levitan, 2006)
If deliberate practice is the critical factor, then the amount needed should be fairly constant
In chess, some people practice 20,000 or more hours and do not achieve master status

Some people are able to attain master status in 3,000 hours
Evidence that expertise depends on more than just the amount of deliberate practice
The very best performance depends on practice starting during a critical period in development.

Highest chess performers (masters, grand masters) started earlier than lower performers, almost all before the age of 12. (Gobet & Campinelli, 2007)


Perfect pitch can be taught if instruction happens when a child is 3-5 years old.

Deliberate practice won't work alone if too late
Stuff with WM capacity
Deliberate practice view: differences in working memory capacity will not be related to performance differences among experts. (prediction)

Contrary to deliberate practice view, the best experts have a greater WM capacity.
Meinz and Hambrick (2010)

Deliberate practice alone can’t account for expertise.
Bottom line on expertise
There is probably some role for basic/innate abilities, but years of deliberate practice can lead to great achievements.

Basic/innate abilities and deliberate practice probably interact. Deliberate practice is necessary and sufficient to attain a high level of achievement, but basic abilities might still impose some limits at the very highest levels.