• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/54

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

54 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
Mechanism
only material and efficient causes
no purpose/meaning behind behavior
consciousness and awareness have no role in behavior
controlled by outside forces
Aristotle
organisms have a soul that gives life to behaviors
did not deny mechanism
De Anima "On the Soul" - 3 types
Formal Causality: explain behavior by pattern of behavior over time
Three Types of Souls
Vegetative: plants, primitive- allows for growth and reproduction
Sensitive: nonhuman animals; allows for motility and very basic feelings/thought
Rational: humans; all aspects of other souls plus higher order mental functioning, abstract thought, rational thought; soul is eternal and never dies

Difference types of soul differ because of how behaviors are experienced
Descartes
reflect-arc model: mechanist
hydraulic model: fluids in our body are stimulated by the environment--move around our body and cause responses
humans are unique- we posses free will
souls in pineal gland- only humans have it, center of the brain, surrounded by "spirits" aka cerebral spinal fluid
Harvey
Mechanist
no need for a soul- heart keeps beating with electrical charges
Glisson
mechanist
man is just a machine, emotion/cognition are just complex behaviors
Hobbes
mechanist
psychic experiences can cause behavior but can be fit into efficient causes of events
De la Mettrie
mechanist
driven by hydraulics
switch model of behavior
mechanism
Sechenov
how does a stimulus cause such an array of feelings?
humans have preprogrammed responses/behaviors
brain is an inhibitory organ
experimental neurosis
Pavlov - dogs, conditioning

present dogs with two perceptual objects- food with circle bowl, shock with ellipse. dogs go crazy when they can't tell if it's a circle or an ellipse
conflicting things in the environment cause neurosis
Psychological Reflexes
freedom, flying, fighting
all behaviors can be conditioned/paired with these 3 basic reflexes
Frequency/Recency
(Strength of Conditioning Effect)
Watson
frequency: stimuli that occur with greater frequency have stronger behavioral responses
recency: more recently something occurs, stronger stimulus effect
Emotion as behavior
Watson
all emotions can be explained by three basic emotion reflexes: fear, rage, love
Counter-Conditioning
condition the opposite of the undesired response
(if bunny-->fear make bunny-->happy)
Systematic Desensitization
create a list of things that deal with the fear, getting progressively worse (interactions)
then expose them starting at bottom of hierarchy
Stamphl's flooding technique: start at top of hierarchy
simply exposing people to what they fear is helpful
Aversion Therapy
Pair something we want people to dislike with a drug that makes them sick
Thorndike's Mechanism
hungry cats in puzzle box
Law of Effect- over time it takes cats less time to get out of the box
changes neural circuitry of the brain
Thorndike (connectionism)
neural pathways are responsible for learning and strengthened by rewards
better learning has to do with the quantity (not quality) of connections in brain
Schedules of Reinforcement
Skinner
Continuous: each desired behavior is rewarded
Intermittent: reinforcing a subset of desired responses
-ratio: requires certain number of desired responses to produce next response
-interval: certain amount of time has passed and then first desired response afterwards gets reinforced
-fixed: same amount of times needs to be passed each for reinforcements
-variable: amount of time varies from one trial to the next
Respondent vs. operant behaviors
Skinner
respondent: observed correlation between stimulus and response, involuntary (heart beating). controlled by antecedent
operant: controlled by the consequences of behavior
Functional Analysis
Skinnerian Reinforcement
used to understand contingencies that are operative in controlled environment
systematically take away contingencies in the environment, if behavior becomes instinct than that was responsible for it
Behaviorism
focus on stimulus-response associations
only interested in correlation between environment and behaviors of an organism in the environment
focus on observable behavior
thoughts are covert behaviors that are controlled by the environment
efficient causality: interested in progression that leads to a behavior
Scientific Management
(Factory Psychology)
Operant Psychology
efficiency is goal of workplace
identify most efficient worker then have other workers employ behaviors of efficient worker
piece-rate pay system
productive for company
workers have poor psychological health and burn out quickly
Response Cost
remove a positive reinforcement every time negative behavior is engaged
Differential Reinforcement of Incompatible Behaviors (DRI)
reinforces a behavior that will replace a maladaptive behavior
Stimulus Control
understand what stimulus conditions cue off a bad behavior and then change the environment person lives in
Classical Conditioning vs. Operant Conditioning
Classical: Pavlov, involuntary reactions, S-S learning
Operant: Skinner, voluntary reactions, S-R learning
Purposive Behaviorism
Tolman
All behaviors are goal-directed/have a purpose
Latent Learning
learning occurs even in absence of reward
Tolman- rat maze experiment
Place learning (vs. motor response learning)
Watson said that organism learns a sequence of motor responses that are critical to getting reward
Tolman did water maze rat experiment--different motor response but behavior was still efficient
Social Learning Theory
Julian Rotter
social approval is the most meaningful mode of reinforcement
thoughts mediate connections between stimulus and response--no learning can occur outside awareness
Locus of control
Locus of Control (LOC)
Internal: believe their behavior is directly linked with desired outcome. motivated
External: believe their behaviors are not linked with outcomes; believe everything is a function of an external event. amotivated
Learned Helplessness
Martin Seligman
any time an organism falls into an unpredictable and uncontrollable event, it falls into learned helplessness
3 dog groups places in harness
group 1: released after 10-15 min
group 2: received painful shocks- could stop be pulling a lever
group 3: received painful shocks but couldn't control it
then groups were put in a shuttle box
group 1 & 2 jumped over partition to keep from being electrified
group 3 lied down and received the shocks- no effort to escape
Cognitive Vulnerability
(Explanatory Style)
Internal: I am the cause of doing poorly (leads to depression)
External: I am not the cause

Stable: poor student all the time (leads to depression)
Unstable: poor student only this time

Global: I will do poorly in all things in the future (leads to depression)
Specific: I will only do poorly on this
Modeling/Vicarious Learning
Bandura
learning occurs all the time, even in absence of rewards
we learn through observation
Bobo experiment
Self-Efficacy Theory
Bandura
cognitive expectations: expectations change our behavior--learning occurs without the influence of reinforcements
contingency beliefs: desired outcomes are linked to one's behaviors
self-efficacy: belief that you're capable of producing the desired outcome
Premises of cognitive behavioral treatments
you can change thoughts like you change behaviors -- thoughts are no more than covert behaviors
Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy
Albert Ellis
we are responsible for how we feel
we have power over our emotional and behavioral destinies because they are a direct result of our thoughts which we have control over

key to change is to examine/dismantle irrational thoughts that underly maladaptive behavior and to focus on the present (it doesn't matter how maladaptive behaviors formed)
Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy Treatment
Assessment: identify activating event and examine role of their beliefs
Disputing: attack patient's irrational beliefs and dismantle them
Shame enhancement/risk taking: tell patients to go into embarrassing events to show that life does not end
intellectual understanding: if patient has correct beliefs then adaptive behaviors will follow. instill rational beliefs
working through: patient puts everything into play
Cognitive Therapy
Aaron Beck
by altering one's underlying cognitive schema then interpretation/impact of negative life events will also change
we experience some negative life event then interpret event with faulty cognitions. Faulty cognitions then lead to maladaptive behavior
collaborative in therapy--client plays an active role
Cognitive Therapy (automatic thoughts)
automatic thoughts lead to maladaptive behavior--we're unaware of them because they're automatic

magnification: magnify problems
minimization: minimize successes
catastrophizing: make big deal out of every little thing
dichotomous thinking: either/or thinking. things are either wholly good or wholly bad
labelling: people apply terms to themselves (failure, evil, etc) and assume that label applies in all aspects of their lives
shoulds: believe we should do something without thinking about it
Cognitive Triad (Cognitive Therapy)
negative views about the self
negative views about experiences
negative views about the future
Reductionism
complex organisms can be reduced to their component parts (biology, chemistry)
Self-Determination Theory
empirical examination of human motivation, emotion, and personality in social context
based on filling our needs of autonomy, competence, and relatedness
organismic perspective
-sources of energy: physiological drives, emotions, and psychological needs
-basic tendency toward unity, wholeness, coherence, and consistency
The Self (in SDT)
process by which we adapt to the world around us
basis of integration (at three levels)
-first level: self moves us psychologically towards intrapersonal integration (within)
-second level: integrate with the physical world around us (with out)
-third level: integration with other (with others)
Five Mini-Theories of SDT (in basic term)
Cognitive Evaluation Theory: focus on intrinsic motivation and events that facilitate intrinisic motivation
Organismic Integration Theory: extrinisic motivation is not bad or completely controlled (can be experienced with some autonomy)
Causality Orientations Theory: individual differences in general motivational styles
Basic Psychological Needs Therapy: found in satisfaction of universal needs
Goal Content Theory: we all have life goals that guide our behavior
Cognitive Evaluation Theory
Harlow: animals would perform behaviors that were not reinforced in the past--motivated by properties in the behavior itself
Montgomery: rats would explore mazes for the sake of exploring--even cross electrified grids
drive theory: four primary drives that motivate all behavior (reinforcing in and of themselves)
-hunger, thirst, sex, and avoidance of pain
Deci's Experiment
undermining experiment
-intrinsically motivated activity
-SOMA puzzle: take these puzzle pieces and make a specific 3D object
-what happens to people’s intrinsic motivation if you give them reward?
-reward group got reward during experiment then they got free time where they could do anything
-reward group: spent less time playing with puzzles during free time; reduced intrinsic motivation
Internalization
Organismic Integration Theory
natural active process of coming to identify with/endorse the value of an extrinsically motivated activity
Extrinsic Motivation (types)
Organismic Integration Theory
External Regulation: we behave because of some reward or threat of punishment. least autonomous, external PLOC
Introjection: source of control is outside the person (but outside the self), take contingencies applied from the environment and apply them to ourselves. somewhat external PLOC
Identification: feel autonomous, see value of behavior and identify with it. somewhat internal PLOC
Integration: take behavior we have identified with and synthesize it with out aspects of the self. internal PLOC
Factors that support internalization
Organism Integration Theory
autonomy support: provide choice, minimize pressure, acknowledge feelings
competence support: provide optimal challenges, relevant feedback
Relatedness support: provide warmth, involvement, be responsive
Causality Orientations Theory
Autonomous: make decisions on their own needs/preferences; interpret external events as informational
Controlled: look to outside world to tell them how to behave; perceive external events as controlling
Impersonal: amotivation; interpret external events as imcompetence
Basic Psychological Needs Theory
needs: innate requirements necessary for ongoing psychological growth, integrity, and well being
because innate, also universal
need autonomy, competence, and relatedness for well being
if needs are met relatively equally, better off for well-being

provide support for basic psychological needs--discuss pros and cons of behavior
internalize autonomous self regulation and perceived competence
by changing competence and autonomy, you can motivate long term behavior change
Goal Content Theory
extrinsic goals are likely not to have any relation to basic psychological needs
positive correlation between intrinsic attainment and well being; negative correlation to ill being
no correlation of extrinsic attainment to well being; positive correlation to ill being