• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/20

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

20 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
  • 3rd side (hint)
motivated tactician?
refers to people's tendency to rely on relatively automatic processes or on more effortful ones, depending on the situational and motivational demands (the term tactician implies that people CHOOSE MODES)
full automaticity?
unintentional, uncontrollable, efficient, autonomous responses outside awareness
amygdala?
involved in neural mechanisms of immediate emotional priming (more related to automatically detecting negative cues)
basal ganglia?
more focused on processes related to reward
brain structured involved in reflex-like forms of social cognition?
1) lateral temp cortex (pSTS and temporal lobe)
2) ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC)
3) dorsal anterior cingulate (dACC)
conscious priming?
post conscious automaticity entails conscious perception of the prime but no awareness of its effects on subsequent reactions
proceduralization?
process whereby dvp of automaticity occurs through practice (involves 2 practice effects)
1) w/ practice, any judgment of a given trait, regardless of the particular behavior will speed up showing a trait-specific practice effect
2) practice effects speeds judgements of traits even in general
controlled processes?
any process in which the perceiver's conscious intent substantially determines how the process operates
goal dependent automaticity?
lack or awareness of the process itself, not needing to monitor the process to completion and lack of intending to all the specific outcomes, it varies by the perceivers goal so it is partially responsive to intentional control.
It requires intentional processing and depends on the task undertaken, conscious intent launches preconscious automaticity.
brooding and rumination?
unwanted thinking about a particular object for a long time
auto-motives?
perhaps situations automatically cue certain motives
(situations determine behavior fairly directly)
+ situations trigger goals, goals trigger actions - all automatically and outside of consciousness
operant thought?
instrumental, problem solving in nature. Monitors progress towards a goal and one tries to protect it from distractions.
respondent thought?
receptive, contributes all ordinary distractions of unbidden images or preemptory thoughts (not effortful)
consciousness?
executive, necessary condition for intent, construction inferred from material created unconsciously
most frequent motives?
belonging, understanding, controlling, enhancing self, trusting in-group
dual process perspective? (person perception)
people initially identify a person automatically and they stop there is the person is not relevant to their goals, if relevant ppl personalize the other using individually tailored concepts.
Dual mode is a series of choice point and branching processes that channel ppl into relatively automatic and controlled forms of thinking of others.
evolving continuum perspective? (person perception)
ppl engage in a continuum of processes ranging from the most automatic, category-based processes to the most deliberate impression formation. (if category confirmation fails, ppl recategorize and generate new, better-fitting categories)
differences b/w dual processing model and the continuum model? (person perception)
dual processing model?
1) distinct types of cognitive representation in distinct branches of impression formation
2) specific rules for passing along each processing branch
continuum model?
1) stable kinds of information across its evolving stages w/ prior stage carrying over subsequent one
2) proposes constant rules, ease of categorization depends on information and motivation
different models in attribution?
1) in one integration model, ppl first identify behavior, aided my context. (b/c behav is ambiguous, identification is a necessary first step, then ppl explain and try to understand the behav. (1= IDENTIFICATION, 2= EXPLANATION)
2) related model splits the first step into categorization of behav and its characterization in dispositional terms (automatic) followed by a controlled correction for situational factors if the perceiver has the capacity/motivation (1= CATEGORIZATION, 2= CORRECTION W/ SITUATIONAL CUES)
3) contrast of spontaneous trait inferences, guided by concepts that come easily to mind, linked to the person, whether appropriate or not, w/ more intentional, goal driven processes.
different models in attitudes?
1) elaboration likelihood model: two routes to persuasion, the peripheral one (low effort processes= ex, in-group source) or central route (high effort processes= ppl carefully scrutinize all arguments and elaborate on them)
2) heuristic-systematic model: contrasts the systematic model ( relatively analytic and comprehensive) w/ the heuristic model (previously stored rules of thumb) = the 2 modes operate in parallel