• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/42

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

42 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back

cognitive psychology

-studies how people acquire information about their environment, how they store that info, and how they use that info


-naturalistic: fit things in the real world


-empirical: use scientific methods

bottom-up processing

-determined by environmental stimuli, not individual's knowledge or expectations


-very rare


-ex: infants

top-down processing

-determined by expectations, memory, and knowledge; not directly by stimulus


-using our existing knowledge


-very limited


-ex: reading


-majority of situations we use both top down and bottom up

introspection

-careful examination & description of one's own inner mental thoughts and states

"about how fast were the cars going when they bumped/smashed into each other?" (Loftus, 1985)

-participants were not able to say why they gave the speed estimates that they did

behaviorism

-focus on observable behavior


-classical & operant conditioning in learning


-rigorous, experimental approach

Tolman's rats

-when changes were made to internal maze, but food was in same place, they weren't thrown off and still went the same way


-they had the ability to know where in general they needed to go (mental representation)

approaches in contemporary cognitive psychology (4)

-experimental cognitive psychology


-cognitive neuropsychology


-cognitive neuroscience


-computational cognitive science

experimental cognitive psychology

-experiments on healthy individuals under carefully controlled lab conditions


-designed to gain insight into internal cognitive processes


cognitive neuropsychology

-study of patients with brain lesions in order to understand how the healthy brain works


-we can see functions of specific parts


-no single part of brain can be isolated (can't be sure it didn't affect other regions)


-ex: Phineas Gage

Phineas Gage

-American railroad construction worker who survived rock blasting accident


-large rod was driven through his dead, destroying much of his brain's left frontal lobe


-normal intelligence, memory, speech, sensation, movement; social behavior changed completely


-changes in behavior led to discoveries on importance of VMPC

patients with lesions in VMPC (ventro-medial prefrontal cortex)

-have normal intelligence but:


-severe impairments in judgment & decision-making (ex: bankrupts, violating norms & laws, loss of relationships)


-abnormalities in emotion

cognitive neuroscience

-observation of healthy brain activity during performance of cognitive tasks


-increased activation in a brain area during a task MAY indicate that its important to the performance of such tasks


-brain imaging: track where blood is flowing


-blood consumption is symptom of brain activity


-EEG, TMS, fMRI, PET, and more

EEG

-recording of electrical activity along the scalp


PET

-based on tracking positrons emitted by a radioactive substance

fMRI

-based on tracking the magnetic resonance from hydrogen particles that are carried by the blood to different brain regions

perception

-the acquisition & processing of sensory information in order to see, hear, taste, or feel objects in the world


-guides our actions with respect to those objects -system organizes stimuli into meaningful objects


-depends on: physical properties of stimulus, experience, prior knowledge, & context

perceptual constancies

-we are able to recognize objects in our natural world very accurately, even though they are hardly ever presented to us in the exact same way


-what changes? angle, distance, background/surroundings, lighting

moon illusion

-moon looks larger when it's close to the horizon than when it's near the zenith


-why? we can compare it to the ground when it's against the horizon

size vs. distance

-higher in the visual field means farther away


-two dimensional stimuli are converted to three dimensional


-if higher (=farther away) and still looks big, then it's probably big

COG lab: visual search

-normally, the reaction time will increase with the number of distractors


-reaction time is longer for "absent" than "present" responses


-reaction time increases with the number of distractors only in conjunction search (not feature search)

feature vs. conjunction search

-feature: only limit search to color; pop out effect; rapid response; # of distractors does not matter


-conjunction: conjunction of shape and color; attention is required; reaction is slower; # of distractors matter

pattern recognitions

-pattern: set of specific features or attributes


-an object that has all the attributes of a pattern will be identified as an instance of the pattern

3 types of neurons in the primary visual cortex (V1)

-simple cell


-complex cells


-hypercomplex cells

simple cell

-responds strongly to specific stimuli (straight bar, angle, edge, etc,) in a particular orientation in a particular location

complex cells

-respond to similar contours in larger receptive fields


-some of them respond mostly to movement direction rather than location

hypercomplex cells

-like complex cells, but respond specifically to a stimuli's length and orientation

single cell recording

-recording of activation in a single VI neuron (# of action potentials) by the image projected on its receptive field


-there is a peak response for one particular orientation, which becomes weaker for other orientations

attention

-allocation of processing resources


-behavioral & cognitive process of selectively concentrating on one aspect of the environment, while ignoring other things

cocktail party problem/effect

-focusing on one conversation, rather than surrounding voices


-we attend to one line of conversation by using physical characteristics


-shows that unattended information receives some processing

bottleneck

-point at which stimuli becomes important or loses its importance

Broadbent's model

-filter model


-unattended message is completely blocked at selective filter stage


-only info that fits physical cues are then sent to a higher level of processing

Treisman's model

-attenuation model


-unattended messages are not entirely blocked


-more flexible & probabilistic model


-whether or not attenuated info gets process and to what degree depends on its threshold and context


-physical properties aren't as definitive


-received support

Deutsch & Deutsch model

-"late selection" model


-everything gets processed in higher level analysis


-what to focus on only comes after this stage


-selection is done just before action

2 mistakes in visual search

-miss (fail to find it)


-false alarm (say it's there, when it's not)

target specialization

-target identification improves when searching only for one type of target

automaticity

-the performance of tasks without any conscious attention, effort, or control


-enables us to allocate attention resources to other tasks at the same time

stroop effect

-much easier for us to read word than identify the color of the font


-reading is an automatized action


-stroop task requires controlled, rather than automatic, performance


-reaction time is longer when the font is incongruent to the word

stroop effect in bilinguals

-no significant difference between English monolinguals, Spanish monolinguals, and Spanish-English bilinguals in reaction time or number of errors


-effect itself is robust and not language-dependent


-if unbalanced, the best-spoken language shows better results in the stroop tasks (make less errors and faster reaction times when you speak the language better)


-the better you are at reading, the better you are at suppressing it; you are better at suppressing reading in languages you are proficient in

multitasking

-attention resources are limited


-automatic tasks can be performed simultaneously fairly well


-when tasks require same resources/system or if they're both controlled, the tasks are impaired


-one controlled task + one (or few) automatic tasks --> fairly easy

dynamic decision making

-prioritization of tasks based on the task, the performer, and the situation

COG lab: stern berg search

-Yes and No answers--> reaction time increases with the number of items


-search is serial


-there's no difference int exaction time between Yes and No answers


-search is not self-terminating (once item is found, we act as if we finish reading the rest of the items)


-search is always exhaustive