• Shuffle
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Alphabetize
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Front First
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Both Sides
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
  • Read
    Toggle On
    Toggle Off
Reading...
Front

Card Range To Study

through

image

Play button

image

Play button

image

Progress

1/20

Click to flip

Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;

Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;

H to show hint;

A reads text to speech;

20 Cards in this Set

  • Front
  • Back
What Research Design is: A researcher randomly allocates 24depressed people to two groups. One group is exposed to 30 minutes of sunshineeach day for a week and the other group is exposed to 30 minutes of fluorescentlight each day for a week. Depression scores are compared at pre- andpost-test.

Experiment

What Research Design is: A researcher administers a questionnaireon attitudes to bullying to 30 6-year-olds and 30 12-year-olds from the sameprimary school. She then compares the attitude scores of the two groups.

QuasiExperiment

What Research Design is: The police want to know if for peoplecaught speeding there is a relationship between age and the amount by whichthey are over the speed limit.

Correlational

Astudy is designed to investigate whether learning a martial art increasespeople’s self-esteem which ones IV & DV?

IV: Learning a martial art




DV: People’s self-esteem

Aresearcher is interested in the effects of stress on decision-making. Participants are given a computer-baseddecision-making task in which their reaction time and error rate are measuredunder two conditions (low stress and high stress) which ones IV & DV?

IV: Low stress and high stress




DV: Computer-based decision-making task

Threats to Internal Validity (and How toAvoid them)?

–Maturation


–Testingeffects (eg dobetter 2nd time because less anxious)


–Practiceeffects –fatigueeffects–historyeffects (events occurring between pre and post)


–Mortality/attritioneffects


–Regressionto the mean (from extreme to less extreme)


–Reactivity(egreacting to being observed)


–Biasedobservation


–Demandcharacteristics


–Hypothesisguessing


–Instrumentationeffects

External validity?

–Setting


–Participants


–Procedures

Modalities of measurement (and when isappropriate to use them):

–Behavioralmeasurement(eginterval, event recording)


–Psychophysicalmeasurement (eg justnoticeable differences)


–Physiologicalmeasurement (egheart rate, EEG)


–Objectivetests self-reportscales

Levels of measurement:

–Nominal(categories –eg malevsfemale)


–ordinal(rank order – eg mostpopular to least)


–Interval(rank order + distance egattitude scores)


–ratioscales (rank order + distance + absolute zero eg time)

Types of scores for measurement:

Raw, normative, ipsative,criterion-referenced

Analysing and interpreting Zscore:

Compareindividual to population with known mean and SD

Analysing and interpreting Z statisic:

Comparesingle sample to population and


Populationmean and SD are known.

Analysing and interpreting Single-samplet:

–Comparesample to population


–PopulationSD unknown – have to estimate.

Analysing and interpreting Relatedsamples t:

–Comparesample to itself on 2 occasions


–Comparesample to paired/matched sample

Analysing and interpreting Independentsamples t:

–Comparetwo unrelated samples to each other.

Analysing and interpreting Pearson’sr:

–Lookfor linear association between two variables.

Nullhypothesis:

–Nodifference between groups


–Noeffect of IV


–Noassociation between variables etc.

pis the?

Probability of producing results asextreme as we have through random sampling alone if the null hypothesis REALLYIS TRUE in the population.

If p is very small (< .05)

We infer that the null hypothesis isFALSE and that there is a REAL difference between groups/effect ofIV/association between variables.

If p is not very small (> .05)

We conservatively retain the nullhypothesis